Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Property agent’s priority is to get the best price


Source : Straits Times – 14 Oct 2009

IT IS good to examine why the ‘one agent representing buyer and seller’ situation happens only in the HDB resale market and not the private property market.

The difference between an HDB resale and private property is that in the latter, once the parties agree on the selling price, the sale is concluded after the legal searches and transfer of titles are carried out. In an HDB resale, the agreed price is not conclusive. The HDB needs to give consent. Obviously, there is more administrative work to do after the agreement on price is inked.

However, administrative work is independent of price. Therefore, when the agent wants to charge an administrative fee that is pegged to a percentage of the agreed price, it gives a wrong impression that he is being rewarded for getting the best price.

I often hear property agents say that HDB resale flats are lower in price compared with private properties, and therefore deserve a 3 per cent commission for the fee to be sizeable to co-broke. If a private property sells for $1 million, the commission of 2 per cent is $20,000, and in a co-broking situation, each agent gets $10,000. For an HDB resale flat selling for $300,000, a 2 per cent commission comes up to $6,000 and is unattractive for co-broking.

However, I must reiterate that a property agent’s fundamental duty is to get the best price for the party he represents. Earning a fee for other aspects of work like running advertisements, walking potential clients and fixing appointments are duties expected of a property agent, but they come after his fundamental duty to get the best price.

Before the authorities implement any control over the issue, I suggest that if a buyer is interested to make an offer to the seller, he can do so with or without the agent present. This is so as not to lose out because the seller’s agent insists on the buyer engaging his administrative services. The agreement between the seller and his agent should have provided that the the latter be entitled to his commission even if it was the seller who closed the deal.

Patrick Sio


Sellers can try mystery caller test to check on their property agents


Source : Straits Times – 14 Oct 2009

WE THANK Ms Kwok Yoke Pui for her Forum Online letter yesterday, ‘Commissions and property agents’.

The Singapore Accredited Estate Agencies’ (SAEA) position expressed in an earlier letter last Friday (’1 agent for buyer, seller: OK, but get written consent’) was that if sellers and buyers wish to appoint estate agents to assist them in their HDB resale transactions, they should be separately represented by estate agents of their choice to avoid a situation of conflict of interest.

An estate agent should act and collect commission only from one party to the transaction, who could either be the seller or the buyer. We had then suggested an exception to permit dual agency if the sellers and buyers are both aware and consent to the appointment of the same agent, preferably in writing. Such a practice, including separate agents of the same agency acting in the same transaction, for example, can be found in some states of the real estate industry in the United States.

The Ministry of National Development has since announced its proposed regulatory framework for public consultation on Oct 12, and the issue of dual agency, especially for HDB resale transactions, will be adequately addressed.

We shall channel Ms Kwok’s feedback to the ministry. Meanwhile, we would offer her suggestion of a ‘mystery caller test’ to sellers who have appointed estate agents to represent them in their HDB resale transactions. Sellers can administer this test to ferret out instances when their appointed agents refuse to entertain offers presented by prospective buyers who do not intend to use the latter’s services.

Dr Tan Tee Khoon
Chief Executive Officer
Singapore Accredited Estate Agencies


At last, real protection in property deals


Source : Straits Times – 14 Oct 2009

THE real estate trade can expect to come under close statutory scrutiny in under a year. Not before time, in our view. According to a projected timeline for public comment and legislative drafting, the latter half of next year is when laws to professionalise the industry and to reinforce consumer protections in residential property deals would have gained parliamentary passage. The regulatory step should have been taken years ago. There has been growing disquiet about the ethical instincts of property agents, and estate agencies have been slow to upgrade service standards even as they prospered in boom cycles. The industry has shown amply it could not be left to regulate itself, which was the Government’s light-touch preference.

For a small market, the over-populated agency sector is, for starters, an embarrassment of riches. There are 1,700 licensed real estate agencies, 25,000-30,000 individual agents. Pruning the numbers alone is no guarantee against malpractice and incompetent handling of client needs, but the common test and trade accreditation for agents proposed by the Ministry of National Development can eliminate unsuitable ones. The industry can build on that by fostering a more professional image so as to attract better educated entrants. But mind this: The act of developing an industry accreditation outfit acceptable to all firms could itself be a challenge, as there are competing trade associations with separate memberships. This will be a test of the industry’s intent to improve itself as the accreditation body shall decide on the content of qualifying tests and continuing education, license agents and maintain an online public register open to consumer inspection. Mind this too: The entrance exam must be rigorous, or the edifice of accountability will come tumbling down.

The ministry also proposes that a tribunal adjudicate disputes, to cut through the present mish-mash of processes that often lead aggrieved parties on an exhausting chase to obtain satisfaction, if that. Go for it. The Consumers Association is currently the first port of call for complainants. Despite its strenuous efforts, it is undermined by lack of enforcement clout.

That function of enforcement and punishment for violations will be exercised by a statutory regulatory agency. This is the most drastic of the proposals. In the circumstances, and considering the failure of self-regulation, it is an acceptable way to ensure compliance. Estate agencies and the more successful of agents may protest that this is a case of overkill. Maybe. But absent the regulatory empowerment, the recommendations will sound like good intentions that will just die on the table.


Gnashing pain of taking over a new HDB flat


Source : Straits Times – 14 Oct 2009

MY HUSBAND and I acquired an HDB flat two months ago. We were told, as standard practice, to check for and indicate any defects within seven days of acquiring the keys or before renovation work started.

We found five minor defects initially. However, as these were rectified, more seemed to crop up each time we went back to check on the repair work. And we are disappointed with the conduct of the HDB’s contractors. We found cigarette butts on our air-con ledge and the coins we placed on the floor as a ritual during the Hungry Ghost month were thrown away.

What checks does HDB carry out before it hands over the flat to owners?

I had specified that the hollow tiles be filled and the work be carried out by a parquet specialist. The HDB promised to see to it, but it was done by a foreign worker whose foreman told him only to rectify the defects. Now, our renovation plan is delayed again.

Hazel Koo (Mrs)


HK ready to avert property bubble


Source : Business Times – 14 Oct 2009

Hong Kong could increase land supply in coming months to rein in property prices, Chief Executive Donald Tsang said, as a luxury flat sold for a world record, heightening concerns about a possible property bubble.

Developer Henderson Land Development said it had sold a deluxe duplex in the Mid-Levels district on the lower slopes of the city’s exclusive Peak for HK$71,280 (US$9,100) per square foot – setting a world record per square foot for an apartment and surpassing London prices.

Property prices in Hong Kong have surged 26 per cent this year, despite the economic downturn, amid low new supply and strong demand for luxury property from wealthy Chinese.

Hong Kong’s government, which controls land supply, has not sold residential land for a year and a half.

‘The government will closely monitor market changes in the coming months. When necessary, we will fine-tune land supply arrangements … with a view to quickening the pace of bringing readily available residential sites to the market,’ Mr Tsang said in his annual policy address to the Legislative Council.

‘The relatively small number of residential units completed and the record prices attained in certain transactions this year have caused concern about the supply of flats, difficulty in purchasing a home, and the possibility of a property bubble,’ he said.

Two 4,000-square-feet (372 sq metres) penthouses in a development on the Kowloon peninsula with views of the city’s harbour, will be among the world’s most expensive apartments if they fetch their price tag of nearly US$38 million.

TROPHY PRICES

Hong Kong’s currency peg to a weak US dollar makes property attractive to foreign investors. The peg forces Hong Kong to track US interest rates – which are expected to stay very low for some time – unlike South Korea, which has threatened to raise rates soon to stave off a property bubble.

Developers have been wooing millionaires from China with a slew of all-expenses paid property-viewing tours.

In September, a one-bedroom 590-sq-ft apartment in a downtown Kowloon district sold for just over US$3 million.

‘People are paying what I describe as trophy prices which don’t bear any reality with what’s happening within the economy,’ said Nicholas Brooke, chairman of real estate consultancy Professional Property Services in Hong Kong.

He said a London flat by the Thames would fetch 2,000 pounds (US$3,200) per square foot, while an apartment overlooking New York’s Central Park would go for US$4,000 per square foot.

Money from new stock market listings and easy bank lending also allow Chinese to snap up luxury property, he said.

Broker Nomura estimates mainland Chinese now account for 11 per cent of Hong Kong property sales and warns of a bubble.

‘Strong liquidity, low supply, strong external demand and aggressive mortgage lending are creating ideal conditions for another housing bubble in Hong Kong,’ Nomura property analyst Paul Louie wrote in a report.

The city’s last property bubble in the late 1990s burst with the 1997/98 Asian financial crisis, triggering a 70 per cent plunge in apartment prices over six years that destroyed wealth and hurt the economy.

The sort of speculative buying of property seen in the late 1990s is not yet apparent, however.

Keith Yeung, property analyst at Mirae Asset Securities, says the market is similar to 2004/05 when prices surged 34 per cent in 2004 but gained just 6 per cent in 2005.

‘The price increases will happen early in the cycle,’ Mr Yeung said. He expects prices to rise by just 5 per cent to 10 per cent next year as supply gradually improves and interest rates rise.


Overwhelming response to Sale of Balance Flats


Source : Channel NewsAsia – 14 Oct 2009

The Housing & Development Board (HDB) says the chances of a first-time flat buyer shortlisted to select a flat under the first Sale of Balance Flats exercise is slim, despite the priority given to them.

This is due to the overwhelming response to the exercise which will end at midnight Wednesday. More than 20,000 applications were received as at 5pm for the 2,100 flats on offer.

About seven in ten applicants are first-time buyers. The rest have bought at least one flat in the past. Demand was high across the board, even in less mature and less centralised locations such as Bukit Batok, Choa Chu Kang and Woodlands.

Property analysts attributed the strong demand partly to the boom in the housing market.

Jeffrey Hong, executive director of HSR Property Group, said: “The cash above valuation, it has been huge right now. Owners are expecting like $50,000 above valuation or some may be asking for $60,000 above valuation. So, for those first-time flat owners, they cannot fork out this money. So, they have basically no choice but to narrow down towards the less popular areas.”

HDB says first-time flat buyers who would like greater certainty in securing a flat should apply for the Build-to-Order or BTO flats, which are the main mode of supply for flats.

Its records show that 96 percent of first-timers have been given a chance to select a BTO flat within two tries.

The HDB will launch two new BTO projects offering more than 1,000 flats in Sengkang and Jurong West on Friday.

This will be followed by six more launches with 4,000 flats in Punggol, Sembawang, Bukit Panjang and Dawson estates in November and December.

This will bring the number of new BTO flats the board is launching to 5,000 in three months.

In total, HDB says it will be supplying 9,000 new BTO flats this year. That’s far more than the 2,900 balance flats sold under the current and previous sale exercises for this year.

HDB says it will continue to monitor housing demand and ensure that there is sufficient flat supply for first-time buyers.


More in London want subsidised housing


Source : Business Times – 15 Oct 2009

Number of applicants on wait list up 6%, the highest since 1999

The number of Londoners waiting for government-subsidised housing rose by 6 per cent to the highest since 1999 as the UK economy soured and the supply of new homes tightened.

The waiting list increased to 353,130 households in 2008, or one in nine London families, from 333,857 a year earlier, the National Housing Federation said in a report called ‘Home Truths’ published yesterday.

‘The economic situation is putting pressure on social housing,’ said Belinda Porich, London regional head of the federation, in an interview. ‘We are building way less than the number of people coming onto the list each year.’

The worst economic slump since World War II has increased unemployment, reduced home construction and raised demand for social housing in the UK capital. It’s a category that includes rent-subsidized, council apartments and houses and properties purchased using low-cost, government-backed plans.

The federation says there continues to be an ‘affordability gap’ in the UK capital. It estimates that the buyer of an average-priced home in London, which costs £362,810 (S$798,182), would have to have an annual income of £93,294. That’s based on a mortgage for 90 per cent of the property’s value and three-and-a-half times the buyer’s salary.

The city’s average household income is £26,156, according to the federation.

Houses in the west London borough of Kensington & Chelsea are the most expensive in the capital, at £1.18 million on average, the federation said, citing government Land Registry figures. The borough with the cheapest house prices is Barking and Dagenham, in east London, at £197,630 on average.

‘Even by London standards, these are astronomical prices and many people – especially young, first-time buyers – can only dream of owning a home,’ said Ms Porich.

The average private rent in London is £206 a week, compared with £86 in a subsidised house or apartment, Ms Porich said.

The housing federation represents non-profit associations that own and manage 380,000 properties in London, or about 11 per cent of the city’s housing stock. Association properties are allocated based on criteria such as income, family size and social need.

Ms Porich said the federation is looking to find ‘new models’ to pay for construction of subsidised homes because its government funding may be squeezed next year.

That may include building houses or apartment blocks on public land in collaboration with local government councils to reduce acquisition costs, she said.


Eco friendly homes for Tianjin


Source : Straits Times – 15 Oct 2009

Officials from China and Singapore yesterday broke ground for a new town of environmentally friendly homes for low-income Chinese.

The first public housing project in the Tianjin Eco-City will showcase some 570 units, each 55 sq m large and sporting features such as solar panels and clean drinking water straight from the tap.

China will draw on some of Singapore’s experience in building, maintaining and upgrading HDB flats in the joint venture, said Ms Grace Fu, the Senior Minister of State for National Development and Education.

‘The emphasis is not just on the economic and commercial development,’ she told Singapore reporters yesterday. ‘It will be a place where economic activities and the community…are in a harmonious relationship.’

Ms Fu – who visited the Eco-City in June – was back here in the coastal city for two days, to lend a hand in the ground-breaking festivities and to ‘understand the progress of the project’.

The project was designed by Surbana International Consultants and developed by the Tianjin Eco-City Administrative Committee.

Singapore hopes to contribute its strengths to bring out the best in a project that may serve as a model for others in future, said Ms Fu. During her Tianjin trip, which ends today, she will visit a secondary school, university, hospital, childcare centre and library to ’see how we can incorporate such facilities into the Eco-City’, she said.

While there are dozens of green cities across China, the Eco-City is daring to be different by emphasising public housing innovations that promote social harmony. It aims to offer at least one-fifth of its units in the form of public housing partially subsidised by the Chinese government.

Over time, 3,000 naturally lit units – with solar panels that will reap energy savings of 70 per cent and heat 60 per cent of the units’ water -?will be built in the 4 sq km start-up area of the project.

Sales will likely start next year but the pricing and eligibility criteria of low-income buyers are still being evaluated.

The ultimate aim is to transform a 30 sq km barren plot of land here in this northern port city into an environmentally friendly community of 350,000 residents, and create up to 60,000 jobs over the next decade.

The Eco-City also looks to deepen collaboration between Singapore and Tianjin in areas such as education.

An exhibition centre featuring technology related to energy, water and waste collection used in the Eco-City has been proposed.

There are also plans for collaboration between Nanyang Technological University and the National University of Singapore with Tianjin institutions on research and development.

The Eco-City is also seeking special incentives and grants from the Chinese government that would attract more green companies to set up shop and to offset the higher costs related to activities such as waste management, said Ms Fu.

She met Vice-Minister Qiu Baoxing of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development in Beijing on Tuesday.

‘We understand from our Chinese counterpart that progress is being made on incentives and grant and policy support for Tianjin Eco-City,’ she said.

Ms Fu expressed hopes of some progress on the matter by April or May next year, when Premier Wen Jiabao and Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong are expected to visit the Eco-City together.

Both leaders had repeatedly emphasised ‘the importance and significance of this project’ when they met in Dalian during the World Economic Forum last month, Ms Fu noted during her meeting with Tianjin deputy party secretary He Lifeng yesterday.

Ms Fu leaves for Beijing tonight and returns to Singapore tomorrow.


UK home market struggles to sustain recovery


Source : Business Times – 15 Oct 2009

Lobby group says transactions will remain low unless lending picks up

The UK housing market will struggle to sustain a recovery unless lending picks up, the head of Britain’s main homebuilding lobby group said.

‘It’s potentially quite fragile,’ Stewart Baseley, chairman of the Home Builders Federation, said in an interview in London on Tuesday. ‘Without mortgage finance, the housing market will continue to be at very low levels of transactions. It’s difficult to describe that as recovery.’

House prices have fallen 13 per cent from their peak two years ago and may drop as much as 30 per cent, Fitch Ratings said in a report last week. Banks are granting about half as many loans every month than at the end of 2007. Lenders remain constrained by a lack of capital and are looking to reduce leverage, Bank of England deputy governor Charles Bean said on Tuesday.

‘We’ve all been surprised by the resilience of prices this year, certainly compared with what we were perhaps expecting at the turn of the year,’ said Mr Basely, whose group represents 80 per cent of the UK homebuilding market. ‘There are more buyers and quite a few are simply not able to make the grade because they don’t have the deposit.’

The lack of affordable mortgages indicates ‘a period of stagnant growth at best, or at worst a double-dip contraction,’ Fitch analysts including Julian Crush said in the report. The credit outlook for the country’s homebuilders remains negative, the agency said.

For now, house prices are climbing. The number of surveyors and estate agents reporting an increase exceeded those reporting declines by 22 percentage points last month, compared with 10 per cent in August, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors said on Tuesday. Halifax, a division of Lloyds Banking Group plc, said last Tuesday that prices rose 1.6 per cent last month.

Homebuilder Bellway plc said on Tuesday that the number of buyers reserving properties has risen by more than half from a year earlier, adding to signs that the market is strengthening after the worst slump in 25 years.

Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s government has bolstered homebuilders by suspending some taxes on property sales and creating a £300 million (S$667.3 million) programme to lend down payments to predominantly first-time buyers.

The construction industry would benefit from an extension of such policies, Mr Baseley said.

Barratt Developments plc, Persimmon plc, Miller Group Ltd and Redrow plc are offering a combined 7,000 homes through the government’s lending programme that is due to finish at the end of March.

Mr Baseley said that he would also like to see future governments focus more on homebuilding. The UK has had four housing ministers in the last two years and another may take office if the Conservatives win an election due by the middle of 2010. Mr Brown’s Labour Party has trailed the opposition for two years in opinion polls.


Seamless experience for Sentosa IR visitors


Source : Business Times – 15 Oct 2009

MOUNT Faber Leisure Group has forged a partnership with Resorts World Sentosa (RWS) to serve visitors to the integrated resort.

Under the partnership, the two parties will jointly distribute and sell admission and attraction tickets for RWS.

‘We are working towards delivering a wide choice of experiences and providing a high standard of service for guests to RWS through The Jewel Box, Singapore’s Iconic Hilltop Destination gateway,’ said Mount Faber CEO Susan Teh.

RWS and Mount Faber will collaborate in key areas, such as a common ticketing system and partnering in MICE events.

There are also plans to create exclusive daily packages that cover all RWS attractions and provide transport services to give RWS visitors a seamless ride experience.

The resort is slated for a soft opening early next year.


HK flat sells at world record

Source : Business Times – 15 Oct 2009
Govt may release more land to deflate property bubble: Donald Tsang
Henderson Land Development Co said it sold a Hong Kong apartment at a record price hours after Chief Executive Donald Tsang said the government may release more land to deflate a property bubble.
Henderson, controlled by billionaire Lee Shau-kee, sold a duplex unit on the 68th floor of 39 Conduit Road for HK$71,280 (S$12,798) per square foot, and said it may ask HK$100,000 per square foot for two penthouses on the 88th floor of the project.
Builders completed the fewest apartments since at least 1972 last year. Prices, especially for luxury units, have rallied in 2009 on record-low interest rates and an influx of money from China. The government is Hong Kong’s biggest provider of land and has altered supply to support or depress prices.
‘The relatively small number of residential units completed and the record prices attained in certain transactions this year have caused concern about the supply of flats, difficulty in purchasing a home and the possibility of a property bubble,’ Mr Tsang said in his annual policy address.
Mr Tsang, 65, said his administration will closely monitor ‘market changes’ in coming months, and may direct the Urban Renewal Authority and subway operator MTR Corp, both government-controlled, to bring readily available building sites to market.
Mr Tsang, Hong Kong’s leader since 2005, may be concerned the luxury-market boom will fuel wider price increases, hurting affordability, Centaline Property Agency Ltd. analyst Wong Leung-sing said.
‘He’s more concerned whether mass market housing prices would get pulled up by the momentum in the luxury market,’ Mr Wong said. ‘If that happens it’ll become a social issue.’ Instead of changing the government’s land-sales system, Mr Tsang is more likely to have the MTR speed the sale of suburban land of interest to all big builders, Mr Wong said.
The city’s Hang Seng Property Index, which includes six companies, climbed 1.6 per cent yesterday, taking this year’s gain to 66 per cent. The benchmark Hang Seng Index rose 2 per cent and has advanced 52 per cent this year to a 14-month high.
Hong Kong, where property companies owned by billionaires including Henderson’s Mr Lee and Cheung Kong (Holdings) Ltd’s Li Ka-shing account for about a 10th of the benchmark stock index, stopped supplying new land in 2002 in the midst of a seven-year property rout. The government started a new system of land auctions in 2004, after prices stabilised.
Thomas Lam, Henderson’s general manager for sales, said the company sold the 39 Conduit Road unit for HK$439 million, or HK$88,000 per square foot of space inside the apartment, equal to £pounds;7,102 (S$15,758) at yesterday’s exchange rate. This breaks the previous record of £pounds;6,000 per square foot set by an apartment in One Hyde Park in London in 2008, Mr Lam said at a press conference in Hong Kong yesterday.
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd, the world’s largest developer by market value, last month raised the asking price of two penthouses in Hong Kong by 50 per cent to a record HK$75,000 a square foot, including a share of common areas in the building, as demand surges for luxury apartments. On that basis, Henderson sold its apartment for HK$71,280 per square foot.
Housing completions in Hong Kong have been lower than initial government projections in the past two years. Builders finished 8,780 units, fewer than the forecast 10,980 last year, and 10,470 in 2007 against the forecast 12,740, the Rating and Valuation Department said in March. It then estimated completions at 14,740 for this year.

Harry’s set to open boutique hotel by April


Source : Straits Times – 15 Oct 2009

HARRY, of the world-famous Harry’s Bar, is going places.

Well, Harry never existed. But the chain of pubs created in his name by an American expat and his friends in 1992, is diversifying to open a boutique hotel here next year and two gourmet coffee cafes.

It is also taking its pub chain abroad, with Vietnam the first stop.

The company, Harry’s Holdings, hopes to continue growing the business, which is fast reaching saturation point in Singapore.

The firm’s chief executive Mohan Mulani said at a media briefing yesterday that the firm will open The Club in Ann Siang Road by late April next year.

The 22-room hotel will operate out of four converted shophouses that used to house the offices of Batey Ads.

Harry’s is leasing the property for an initial five years, with an option to renew for another three five-year terms.

In all, it is spending about $3.5 million to transform the property into The Club, boasting a rooftop skybar, the first Espressamente illy cafe in Singapore, a terrace bar and a tapas corner.

The second Espressamente illy cafe – Harry’s has the Singapore franchise for the Italian coffee chain – could open at another hotel in Mohamed Sultan Road.

He said room rates at the hotel – designed by Ministry of Design, which did the stylish New Majestic Hotel in Chinatown – are expected to be about $250.

The hotel will generate one-third of The Club’s revenue, and food and beverage the rest, he said. ‘We’re going to leverage on this (The Club) to expand around the region… in Jakarta, Bangkok, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City.’

‘We’re reaching the end of expansion for Harry’s, which is why we are launching the hotel and catering business.’

The plan is to open at least one Harry’s bar in Vietnam by late next year and to take The Club overseas by 2011, he said.

In Singapore, the firm will launch five more bars and five new Mirchi’s Kebab Factory outlets in the next 12 months.

Harry’s has 25 bars, four restaurants, a night club and a catering business. The growth has been fast and furious.

Early on, Harry’s Bar at Boat Quay gained global notoriety when ‘rogue trader’ Nick Leeson hit the headlines over the collapse of Barings Bank. He had been a regular patron of the bar.

Mr Mulani, also a regular, bought into the business in 1993 taking full control in 1994. He waited until 2003 to open a second bar. ‘I was busy doing textile trading then but the business kind of evaporated during the Asian financial crisis,’ he said.

With no other business to distract him, he focused on growing Harry’s bar.

Harry’s is already listed on the Phillip Capital OTC (over-the-counter) market but hopes to move to Catalist by March or April next year, said Mr Mulani.

The company has been planning its move to the Singapore Exchange’s second board Catalist to increase trading in its shares and help finance its expansion.

He had said early last year that he was looking to move Harry’s to Catalist by June last year. But the plan was derailed by the global financial crisis.

Yesterday, Mr Mulani said Collins Stewart will be Harry’s sponsor.


20,691 apply for 2,132 ready flats


Source : Straits Times – 15 Oct 2009

THE Housing Board (HDB) has been swamped by 20,691 applications for 2,132 completed or near-completed flats – in a sign of red-hot demand for its homes.

Applications for the flats – which are at various locations across the island, including sought-after mature estates – closed yesterday.

The eye-popping figures mean there were almost 10 bids for every available flat – an overwhelming level of demand not seen since the pre-financial crisis property boom, analysts say.

HDB said in a statement yesterday that it had ‘expected strong interest for these flats as they are limited in number, located in the popular mature estates, and are either completed or close to completion’.

About seven out of 10 applicants are first-time flat buyers, said HDB. But despite priority being given to first-timers, the chances of being short-listed to select a flat ‘will not be high due to the overwhelming response’, it said.

Industry observers say this reflects strong demand for readily available flats. These buyers were likely to have been pushed out of the resale flat market, where prices are at historic highs.

Latest estimates showed that HDB resale flat prices rose 3.2 per cent in the third quarter over the second quarter, after an increase of 1.4 per cent in the second quarter over the first three months of the year.

This was on top of a hefty 31.2 per cent price jump in the past two years.

‘The primary attraction of these flats is buyers don’t have to wait – and they don’t need to fork out cash over valuation (COV),’ said ERA Asia-Pacific’s associate director Eugene Lim. COV refers to the cash a buyer must pay a seller above the flat’s valuation – a common practice in the resale market.

The local property market’s revival has led to a steady increase in COV values of late, as sellers factor in future price rises.

The intense demand for the latest batch of flats, launched for sale on Oct 1, extended even to traditionally less popular outlying estates such as Punggol and Sengkang.

For example, 1,022 applications were made for 26 four-room flats in Sengkang – which works out to 39 bids for each flat. Over at Jurong West, there were 905 applications for just 19 four-room flats – 47 times the number of flats offered.

PropNex chief executive Mohamed Ismail said this was because in ‘absolute pricing’, these flats were more attractively priced than their counterparts in mature estates. Four-room flats in Jurong West started from $219,000 and those in Punggol started at $245,000.

Still, even the pricier flats at The Pinnacle @ Duxton – costing up to $553,000 for four-room units and $643,000 for five-room ones – attracted a healthy response.

HDB urged first-time flat buyers who would like greater certainty in securing a flat to apply for its build-to-order (BTO) flats, where 90 per cent of flats are set aside for first-timers.

These flats typically take three to four years to be ready since the HDB builds according to demand.

HDB said its records show that 96 per cent of first-timers get a chance to select a BTO flat within two tries. It also said it will be launching two new BTO projects offering more than 1,000 flats in Sengkang and Jurong West tomorrow.

In the next two months, it will launch a further six BTO projects offering 4,000 flats in Punggol, Sembawang, Bukit Panjang and Dawson.

HDB’s latest sale was under the Sales of Balance Flats scheme, which has replaced the balloting, quarterly sales and half-yearly sales exercises. The HDB will issue one final update on application numbers today at 2pm.

The scheme offers flats left over from earlier BTO exercises, the Selective En-bloc Redevelopment Scheme, and also repurchased flats. Such sales exercises will be launched as and when sufficient flats accumulate, said HDB.

Ngee Ann Polytechnic real estate lecturer Nicholas Mak said the private property boom could also be a factor for the strong demand, as buyers – particularly permanent residents – turn to the resale market. This in turn, pushes first-timers into the flat queues directly to the HDB.

One flat buyer Jeffrey Chua, 30, applied for a four-roomer in Bukit Merah. ‘I know the chances are slim, but no harm trying my luck. It beats buying off the resale market right now.’


MAIN DRAWS

‘The primary attraction of these flats is buyers don’t have to wait – and they don’t need to fork out cash over valuation.’ERA Asia-Pacific’s associate director Eugene Lim


‘Shoebox’ units may wilt under URA’s gaze


Source : Business Times – 15 Oct 2009

Recent applications for apartments below 300 sq ft understood to have been rejected

The new breed of ’shoebox’ private apartments may have caught the imagination, but don’t expect them to invade the housing landscape. Some may not even get the planning authority’s approval, going forward, if recent decisions are any guide.

Earlier this month, Singapore saw its smallest ever apartment unit – at 258 square feet – being put on the market at the Suites@Guillemard project. While this made headlines, BT understands that the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) recently turned down some applications involving apartments below 28 square metres (or about 300 sq ft).

Apart from the size, the layout of the proposed micro units may also have been a factor. For instance, if an apartment does not adequately provide for a kitchen, it may resemble a hotel room rather than a residential development.

When contacted, URA said that it does not stipulate that private housing units should be of a minimum size or that a development should have a certain mix of unit sizes. However, it said: ‘We have observed that some developers have been building smaller apartment units.

‘URA will continue to monitor private housing development trends and ensure that our planning guidelines stay relevant in providing a quality living environment for our residents.’

The market has seen a surge in transactions of shoebox units, generally defined as below 500 sq ft, this year. BT understands that one issue that the authorities are grappling with is whether there is a real need for such apartments.

Since February, developers have found it easy to sell smallish apartments as their lumpsum unit price is affordable to a bigger pool of buyers.

This has also made it easier for speculators to jump on the bandwagon. Hence, the concern is that shoebox units fuel property speculation.

Another issue is whether buyers who buy such micro units off-plan realise what they are in for.

Ho Bee Investment chairman and CEO Chua Thian Poh said: ‘When you buy a 200-300 sq ft unit off-plan, you may not realise how small it is. But when you see the finished product, you’ll know how cramped it is. It’s not very liveable. I would rather stay in Housing Board flats. The size is much bigger, and the price quantum is not too far off.’

If ‘normal’ tenants like expatriates, foreign students and Singaporean yuppies do not wish to live in such small units, shoebox unit owners may push their properties to those who prefer shorter-term usage, including those in ‘hourly-rate businesses’, as one analyst put it.

DTZ executive director (consulting) Ong Choon Fah said that there could be a potential supply-demand mismatch if the trend of ‘mickey mouse’ apartments picks up.

‘We could have a situation where there are a lot of apartments but not the type that people would want to live in.’

Some argue that it is too early to rule out leasing interest for such units from single expats on small housing budgets.

However, Ho Bee executive director Ong Chong Hua said: ‘Those who do shoebox apartments will tell you there’s a rental market for such units. But if I’m a single expat, assuming I want to live in this kind of shoebox apartment development, then I must also consider the profile of the people who’ll be my neighbours. I think it is only natural to assume they’ll not be the normal neighbours you would expect in a typical housing development.’

Apart from ’shoebox’ units, other smallish units have surfaced since February. These include two-bedders starting from about 750 sq ft and three bedders from around 900 sq ft.

Developers can try to push for a higher per square foot selling price by having smaller units so long as the overall lumpsum quantum does not cross the typical HDB upgrader’s budget, which could be $1 million.

DTZ’s Mrs Ong also said that the trend of shoebox apartments could also have a social impact, as seen in Hong Kong. ‘People have breakfast, lunch and dinner outside, and spend most of their time out of their homes as they don’t wish to be cooped up within four walls. But this may not be conducive to developing family life, which Singapore is trying to promote.’

Real Estate Developers Association of Singapore CEO Steven Choo said that ‘it is not inconceivable that, in future, 200-300 sq ft apartments could become popular in Singapore as already seen in Central London where 40 per cent of all households are single-person households’.

‘There are districts populated with studio apartments catering to lawyers, financial industry professionals and students,’ he added.

However, CBRE executive director (residential) Joseph Tan said that since most of Singapore’s population live in HDB flats, the size of public housing units set the base.

‘Unlike London and Hong Kong where people may not have much choice but to squeeze into a shoebox unit, in Singapore people have the option of buying or renting a HDB flat.’

Agreeing, ERA associate director Eugene Lim noted that even an expat on a small housing budget can rent an HDB flat on the open market.

‘Of course, there won’t be any swimming pool or gym, whereas a resident of even a shoebox unit in a private apartment development or condo would be entitled to enjoy these facilities,’ he added.


Luxury apartment sector feels the rush


Source : Business Times – 15 Oct 2009

More deals clinched as sentiment improves, foreign buyers sniff around

Luxury apartment deals picked up in the second and third quarters of this year as a more cheerful mood spread to the upper realms of the private residential market.

The number of apartments priced above $4 million changing hands rose rapidly from just 15 deals in the first quarter of this year to 87 in Q2 and 210 in Q3.

The total of 312 apartments in this price range sold in the first nine months of this year are 11 per cent more than the 280 transacted for the whole of 2008, which was generally a quiet year for the Singapore residential market following the global financial crisis, notes CB Richard Ellis (CBRE). It analysed caveats information from URA’s Realis system up to Oct 12.

During 2007 – the peak year for the luxury housing market – a total 1,740 apartments were sold at over $4 million each.

CBRE studied caveats data for condo and apartment deals in the Core Central Region, which includes the prime districts 9, 10 and 11; the financial district; and the HarbourFront and Sentosa Cove locations. The transactions include both primary and secondary market transactions but exclude collective sales.

Joseph Tan, the firm’s executive director (residential), says that some investors feel this is a good time to buy luxury apartments as they stand to net capital gains before the price surge sweeps this segment.

‘In addition, with the appreciation of foreign currencies against the Sing dollar in recent months, foreign investors could have found prices of luxury apartments here fairly attractive,’ he said.

Looking ahead, he sees an increase in high-value transactions with upcoming new luxury projects such as Marina Bay Suites and Seven Palms Sentosa Cove as there will be investors interested in these projects. ‘Buying interest will be project-driven, based on the uniqueness of each project,’ Mr Tan added.

Developers report a pick-up in sales of luxury apartments to both Singaporeans and foreigners.

Wheelock Properties (Singapore) CEO David Lawrence says: ‘A lot of foreigners talk to us about buying quality property assets in Singapore. They include high-net-worth (HNW) Indians and Chinese who are thinking of becoming Singapore permanent residents and wish to move their families here.’

Savills Singapore managing director Michael Ng also says the Republic has been a beneficiary of wealthy Asians from places like China, Malaysia and India coming out again to buy luxury properties with renewed confidence upon sensing that the worst is over in the overall global economy.

‘A lot of them see Singapore as a safe place to park their family and money,’ he added.

The thinking in property circles is that foreign buying will strengthen further when Singapore’s two integrated resorts (IRs) open next year. And this should translate to stronger demand for luxury apartments.

CBRE’s data showed that about 86 per cent or 268 of the 312 units sold at above $4 million in the first nine months of 2009 were in the ‘above $4 million to $7 million range’.

They included developer sales in projects like Volari at Balmoral Road, Residences@Killiney, One Devonshire, Latitude at Jalan Mutiara, Madison Residences in Bukit Timah, and The Orchard Residences. This segment saw the biggest recovery in transaction volume over full-year 2008.

A total of 35 caveats were lodged for properties that cost between $7 million and $9 million in the first nine months of this year. The transactions, which were mostly in Q3, include The Hamilton Scotts and The Orchard Residences in the primary market (developer sales), and Ardmore Park, St Regis Residences and Scotts Highpark in the secondary market.

There was a caveat lodged for a unit at Nassim Park Residences that cost nearly $13.3 million in July and two in August (at about $9.6 million and $9.8 million), based on URA Realis caveats data as at Oct 12.

However, BT understands that since then, two more units were sold in the development in September, followed by a further two so far this month.

The four units were sold at prices ranging from $9.6 million to $14 million, or from about $2,850 per square foot to $3,480 psf.

BT understands there have been close to a dozen transactions at Nassim Park Residences since mid-year. However, buyers of some units have yet to lodge caveats.


Tuesday, October 13, 2009

US housing risks lurk even as buyers return


Source : Business Times – 13 Oct 2009

Postponed foreclosures create a backlog that banks may dump onto the market

On the surface, a glimmer of confidence is returning to the battered US housing market, after more than three years of gut-wrenching defaults, price slumps and foreclosures.

But investors and homeowners in California, the most populous US state and a benchmark for housing across the country, are bracing for another fall as emergency government support measures fall short or expire.

‘All that has been achieved is to put off the real pain until later on,’ said Mark Jacques, a mortgage broker in Corona Del Mar, California. ‘I’m hunkering down for the storm.’

California led the United States when housing prices soared early this decade, spurred by an array of public policy incentives to encourage home ownership. The boom fuelled a frenzy of lending and spending that drove the US economy.

But California proved to be the epicentre of reckless lending that pushed housing throughout most of the United States over a cliff in 2007, triggering a credit crisis that plunged the world economy into recession.

The sobering view now from ground zero of the US property market underscores the problems faced by President Barack Obama as he tries to fix the US economy.

Washington is trying to stem rising numbers of homeowners who cannot afford their mortgages as job losses mount.

Housing prices have fallen to levels not seen since 2003.

But even investors pouring millions of dollars back into real estate say it may take up to four more years for California’s housing market to settle.

The reasons why – rising foreclosures, joblessness and tight credit – are not unique to the state and may have already slowed a recent recovery in places like Florida.

A first test of the US housing rebound could come with the scheduled Nov 30 expiry of an US$8,000 tax credit for first-time buyers.

The plan has resulted in 357,000 home sales so far in 2009, out of a total 3.88 million, according to a survey of realtors by research firm Campbell Communications Inc.

Ending the credit will likely cause a drop-off in buyers, or a ‘false peak’ of the budding housing recovery, according to John Burns Real Estate Consulting in Irvine, California.

Thawing credit

In a sign of concern in Washington that the housing market cannot yet stand on its own feet, administration officials say they are considering an extension of the credit.

Helped by government measures and a sense that the worst of the price slump is over, US home prices have risen nearly 4 per cent from their low point in April. But the bounce was preceded by a 33 per cent slide since the peak in July 2006.

The nascent housing recovery has combined with stronger data in other sectors to suggest that the US recession is over.

This has helped thaw credit markets that are the lifeblood of the economy.

Bidding wars are breaking out in some areas. Sales are now routinely above asking prices in California, from wealthy Orange County towns like Irvine to harder-hit San Bernardino County in the high desert, east of Los Angeles.

‘The number of people around with cash right now is unbelievable,’ said Janice Konkol of FirstTeam Real Estate in Irvine, showing a foreclosed home on the market for nearly US$650,000. Business cards littering the kitchen counter told of frequent visits by realtors. The house sold for US$890,000 in mid-2007 – and when new in 2002 for US$461,000.

But the underlying picture remains weak.

Efforts by the government and by banks to help struggling homeowners cut payments and stay in their homes are outpaced by mortgages going bad. The mortgage-modification programmes risk being swamped by rising unemployment.

‘Whether we put a dent in it is hard to say,’ said JC Ferebee, manager of Wells Fargo & Co’s team at a mass modification event in Los Angeles.

The event drew 50,000 people over five days, hoping for mortgage-reduction deals to help keep them in their homes, according to the organisers, the Neighborhood Assistance Corp of America. It presses banks to avoid foreclosures.

‘When you look at the whole culture right now and the economy with the jobs situation . . . it’s a domino effect,’ said Mr Ferebee.

The US jobless rate in September hit a 26-year high of 9.8 per cent and is likely to head into the double-digit levels already suffered in California.

The jobless rate is usually considered to be a lagging economic indicator because employers are slow to hire after a recession as they wait to be sure a recovery is for real.

Economists fear that a protracted and high unemployment rate this time will deter Americans from spending more again on houses and goods, raising the prospect of a slow recovery.

‘If the economy continues to lose jobs, demand by consumers becomes inhibited even if you have very low (interest) rates,’ said Mohamed El-Erian, chief executive of Pacific Investment Management Co, the world’s largest bond fund manager.

Aware of the risks posed by unemployment to the economy, the Obama administration is considering extending unemployment benefits as well as the first-time homebuyer tax credit.

The swift downturn in California’s economy and the ensuing wave of job losses cost Sue and Nabil Boctor their house.

They own Sue’s Cafe, a small diner near downtown Riverside, California, a thriving business centre just 15 months ago.

‘This place was crowded every day,’ Sue, 59, said, sitting in her deserted cafe, scanning a newspaper for apartments to rent. ‘We had three people helping to deliver food and even then we couldn’t keep up.’

Many of the one and two-story office buildings nearby carry large ‘for lease’ banners and the parking lots are all but empty. A local shopping mall stands more than half vacant, its liquor store the only one still doing a roaring trade.

Until recently, the local construction industry strained to meet demand for new homes.

Warehouses were full of consumer goods arriving from Asia via US West Coast ports to meet the seemingly insatiable appetite of once free-spending Americans.

Most of the Boctors’ customers have lost their jobs or their work hours were cut so much that they no longer eat out.

The Boctors’ story is not the usual cautionary tale of the housing crisis.

Sudden collapse

Unlike many borrowers who took out mortgages without having to put any money down and then borrowed further still against the value of their homes, they put down US$100,000 and took out a US$440,000 mortgage with a stable, fixed rate of interest.

But the sudden collapse of the local economy, and their business along with it, meant they could no longer afford the mortgage payments. Their house, their dream home for their retirement, was due to be auctioned off today.

Nearly 18 per cent of working-age Californians were either officially classed as unemployed, working part-time because they could not find full-time work or had given up looking for a job in the second quarter of 2009, according to official data, compared with nearly 14 per cent nationally.

‘I do think we’ve come into a new cycle’ of defaults, said Ron Faris, president of Ocwen Financial Corp, a servicer of 280,000 sub-prime mortgages.

He has noted a shift in the causes for debt delinquency from rising loan costs to joblessness.

Standing on his sun-baked driveway in Moreno Valley, a small town 19 km from Riverside, Nabil Boctor, 65, pointed to four houses on his block that have been foreclosed on and now stand empty.

‘The crisis is everywhere and it’s growing,’ he said. ‘This will take a decade to work itself out and by the time it’s over everyone is going to have to feel some pain.’ Around the corner, a family was loading a trailer with their belongings, ready to move on.

What banks do now with properties their occupants cannot afford is the biggest unknown factor in the housing market.

Economists fear a repeat of the flood of foreclosure listings that scared all but vulture buyers – specialised in assets few others want – and sped the 2008-09 price slump.

More than half of house sales in southern California in late 2008 and early this year involved ‘distressed’ properties, accelerating price drops, according to Thomas Lawler, founder of Lawler Economic & Housing Consulting in Leesburg, Virginia.

In response to the slump, banks slowed foreclosure sales to seek other solutions for homeowners and help shore up prices.

At the same time, the Federal Reserve’s emergency slashing of interest rates to near zero has helped encourage buyers to take advantage of the lowest prices in decades and a rush by the Federal Housing Administration, a US agency, to guarantee more loans is also helping would-be home owners find credit.

But the emergency steps by the government and the Fed will be overrun by economic forces, according to many analysts.

‘We are far from persuaded by a little summer upturn in a sector that the government had endeavoured so mightily to support,’ Deutsche Bank said in a report last month.

In California’s Inland Empire – a 69,900-square-kilometre region made up of Riverside and San Bernardino counties, prices will likely fall 15 per cent from June for a peak-to-trough drop of 66 per cent, the most for the biggest 10 US metropolitan areas, Deutsche Bank predicted.

Backlog of foreclosures

Local buyers rely not only on the scheduled-to-expire tax credit but almost entirely on funding from the FHA, which in response to rising taxpayer losses may soon tighten access to its credit. One bill would require bigger down-payments.

Furthermore, in a worrying sign for the plans to help struggling homeowners across America, modifying loans – rather than foreclosing on homes – often does not work.

Nearly 43 per cent of homeowners whose mortgages were modified in the first quarter fell behind on payments within three months, data from the US Office of the Comptroller of Currency shows. For older modifications, the re-default rate is above 50 per cent.

Postponed foreclosures have created a backlog that banks may have little alternative but to dump onto the market.

Foreclosures being processed surged nearly 80 per cent in the second quarter from a year earlier to nearly 1 million. But completed foreclosures fell nearly 10 per cent to 106,007, the OCC says.

Brokers in California bemoan what they say is just a delay in the inevitable pain of people losing their homes and the follow-on boom in sales of cheap properties, something for which there is no shortage of demand today.

Bruce Norris, president of property investment firm The Norris Group, said inventory levels are ‘completely artificial, completely baloney . . . The delinquency rate (in California) has exploded, but inventory levels have gone down. In many of these cases the banks have simply avoided foreclosure.’

Amherst Securities, a broker-dealer specialising in residential mortgage-backed securities, calculated that a mountain of 7 million US housing units is likely to end up on the market – equivalent to 135 per cent of a normal year’s supply.

‘It’s going to drip on the market,’ said broker Fred Arnold in Stevenson Ranch, California. ‘We don’t have the state and federal government that will let the natural supply and demand market occur which is pushing the real estate problem into 2012.’


US housing risks lurk even as buyers return


Source : Business Times – 13 Oct 2009

Postponed foreclosures create a backlog that banks may dump onto the market

On the surface, a glimmer of confidence is returning to the battered US housing market, after more than three years of gut-wrenching defaults, price slumps and foreclosures.

But investors and homeowners in California, the most populous US state and a benchmark for housing across the country, are bracing for another fall as emergency government support measures fall short or expire.

‘All that has been achieved is to put off the real pain until later on,’ said Mark Jacques, a mortgage broker in Corona Del Mar, California. ‘I’m hunkering down for the storm.’

California led the United States when housing prices soared early this decade, spurred by an array of public policy incentives to encourage home ownership. The boom fuelled a frenzy of lending and spending that drove the US economy.

But California proved to be the epicentre of reckless lending that pushed housing throughout most of the United States over a cliff in 2007, triggering a credit crisis that plunged the world economy into recession.

The sobering view now from ground zero of the US property market underscores the problems faced by President Barack Obama as he tries to fix the US economy.

Washington is trying to stem rising numbers of homeowners who cannot afford their mortgages as job losses mount.

Housing prices have fallen to levels not seen since 2003.

But even investors pouring millions of dollars back into real estate say it may take up to four more years for California’s housing market to settle.

The reasons why – rising foreclosures, joblessness and tight credit – are not unique to the state and may have already slowed a recent recovery in places like Florida.

A first test of the US housing rebound could come with the scheduled Nov 30 expiry of an US$8,000 tax credit for first-time buyers.

The plan has resulted in 357,000 home sales so far in 2009, out of a total 3.88 million, according to a survey of realtors by research firm Campbell Communications Inc.

Ending the credit will likely cause a drop-off in buyers, or a ‘false peak’ of the budding housing recovery, according to John Burns Real Estate Consulting in Irvine, California.

Thawing credit

In a sign of concern in Washington that the housing market cannot yet stand on its own feet, administration officials say they are considering an extension of the credit.

Helped by government measures and a sense that the worst of the price slump is over, US home prices have risen nearly 4 per cent from their low point in April. But the bounce was preceded by a 33 per cent slide since the peak in July 2006.

The nascent housing recovery has combined with stronger data in other sectors to suggest that the US recession is over.

This has helped thaw credit markets that are the lifeblood of the economy.

Bidding wars are breaking out in some areas. Sales are now routinely above asking prices in California, from wealthy Orange County towns like Irvine to harder-hit San Bernardino County in the high desert, east of Los Angeles.

‘The number of people around with cash right now is unbelievable,’ said Janice Konkol of FirstTeam Real Estate in Irvine, showing a foreclosed home on the market for nearly US$650,000. Business cards littering the kitchen counter told of frequent visits by realtors. The house sold for US$890,000 in mid-2007 – and when new in 2002 for US$461,000.

But the underlying picture remains weak.

Efforts by the government and by banks to help struggling homeowners cut payments and stay in their homes are outpaced by mortgages going bad. The mortgage-modification programmes risk being swamped by rising unemployment.

‘Whether we put a dent in it is hard to say,’ said JC Ferebee, manager of Wells Fargo & Co’s team at a mass modification event in Los Angeles.

The event drew 50,000 people over five days, hoping for mortgage-reduction deals to help keep them in their homes, according to the organisers, the Neighborhood Assistance Corp of America. It presses banks to avoid foreclosures.

‘When you look at the whole culture right now and the economy with the jobs situation . . . it’s a domino effect,’ said Mr Ferebee.

The US jobless rate in September hit a 26-year high of 9.8 per cent and is likely to head into the double-digit levels already suffered in California.

The jobless rate is usually considered to be a lagging economic indicator because employers are slow to hire after a recession as they wait to be sure a recovery is for real.

Economists fear that a protracted and high unemployment rate this time will deter Americans from spending more again on houses and goods, raising the prospect of a slow recovery.

‘If the economy continues to lose jobs, demand by consumers becomes inhibited even if you have very low (interest) rates,’ said Mohamed El-Erian, chief executive of Pacific Investment Management Co, the world’s largest bond fund manager.

Aware of the risks posed by unemployment to the economy, the Obama administration is considering extending unemployment benefits as well as the first-time homebuyer tax credit.

The swift downturn in California’s economy and the ensuing wave of job losses cost Sue and Nabil Boctor their house.

They own Sue’s Cafe, a small diner near downtown Riverside, California, a thriving business centre just 15 months ago.

‘This place was crowded every day,’ Sue, 59, said, sitting in her deserted cafe, scanning a newspaper for apartments to rent. ‘We had three people helping to deliver food and even then we couldn’t keep up.’

Many of the one and two-story office buildings nearby carry large ‘for lease’ banners and the parking lots are all but empty. A local shopping mall stands more than half vacant, its liquor store the only one still doing a roaring trade.

Until recently, the local construction industry strained to meet demand for new homes.

Warehouses were full of consumer goods arriving from Asia via US West Coast ports to meet the seemingly insatiable appetite of once free-spending Americans.

Most of the Boctors’ customers have lost their jobs or their work hours were cut so much that they no longer eat out.

The Boctors’ story is not the usual cautionary tale of the housing crisis.

Sudden collapse

Unlike many borrowers who took out mortgages without having to put any money down and then borrowed further still against the value of their homes, they put down US$100,000 and took out a US$440,000 mortgage with a stable, fixed rate of interest.

But the sudden collapse of the local economy, and their business along with it, meant they could no longer afford the mortgage payments. Their house, their dream home for their retirement, was due to be auctioned off today.

Nearly 18 per cent of working-age Californians were either officially classed as unemployed, working part-time because they could not find full-time work or had given up looking for a job in the second quarter of 2009, according to official data, compared with nearly 14 per cent nationally.

‘I do think we’ve come into a new cycle’ of defaults, said Ron Faris, president of Ocwen Financial Corp, a servicer of 280,000 sub-prime mortgages.

He has noted a shift in the causes for debt delinquency from rising loan costs to joblessness.

Standing on his sun-baked driveway in Moreno Valley, a small town 19 km from Riverside, Nabil Boctor, 65, pointed to four houses on his block that have been foreclosed on and now stand empty.

‘The crisis is everywhere and it’s growing,’ he said. ‘This will take a decade to work itself out and by the time it’s over everyone is going to have to feel some pain.’ Around the corner, a family was loading a trailer with their belongings, ready to move on.

What banks do now with properties their occupants cannot afford is the biggest unknown factor in the housing market.

Economists fear a repeat of the flood of foreclosure listings that scared all but vulture buyers – specialised in assets few others want – and sped the 2008-09 price slump.

More than half of house sales in southern California in late 2008 and early this year involved ‘distressed’ properties, accelerating price drops, according to Thomas Lawler, founder of Lawler Economic & Housing Consulting in Leesburg, Virginia.

In response to the slump, banks slowed foreclosure sales to seek other solutions for homeowners and help shore up prices.

At the same time, the Federal Reserve’s emergency slashing of interest rates to near zero has helped encourage buyers to take advantage of the lowest prices in decades and a rush by the Federal Housing Administration, a US agency, to guarantee more loans is also helping would-be home owners find credit.

But the emergency steps by the government and the Fed will be overrun by economic forces, according to many analysts.

‘We are far from persuaded by a little summer upturn in a sector that the government had endeavoured so mightily to support,’ Deutsche Bank said in a report last month.

In California’s Inland Empire – a 69,900-square-kilometre region made up of Riverside and San Bernardino counties, prices will likely fall 15 per cent from June for a peak-to-trough drop of 66 per cent, the most for the biggest 10 US metropolitan areas, Deutsche Bank predicted.

Backlog of foreclosures

Local buyers rely not only on the scheduled-to-expire tax credit but almost entirely on funding from the FHA, which in response to rising taxpayer losses may soon tighten access to its credit. One bill would require bigger down-payments.

Furthermore, in a worrying sign for the plans to help struggling homeowners across America, modifying loans – rather than foreclosing on homes – often does not work.

Nearly 43 per cent of homeowners whose mortgages were modified in the first quarter fell behind on payments within three months, data from the US Office of the Comptroller of Currency shows. For older modifications, the re-default rate is above 50 per cent.

Postponed foreclosures have created a backlog that banks may have little alternative but to dump onto the market.

Foreclosures being processed surged nearly 80 per cent in the second quarter from a year earlier to nearly 1 million. But completed foreclosures fell nearly 10 per cent to 106,007, the OCC says.

Brokers in California bemoan what they say is just a delay in the inevitable pain of people losing their homes and the follow-on boom in sales of cheap properties, something for which there is no shortage of demand today.

Bruce Norris, president of property investment firm The Norris Group, said inventory levels are ‘completely artificial, completely baloney . . . The delinquency rate (in California) has exploded, but inventory levels have gone down. In many of these cases the banks have simply avoided foreclosure.’

Amherst Securities, a broker-dealer specialising in residential mortgage-backed securities, calculated that a mountain of 7 million US housing units is likely to end up on the market – equivalent to 135 per cent of a normal year’s supply.

‘It’s going to drip on the market,’ said broker Fred Arnold in Stevenson Ranch, California. ‘We don’t have the state and federal government that will let the natural supply and demand market occur which is pushing the real estate problem into 2012.’


UK home loans up 29% yoy in Aug


Source : Business Times – 13 Oct 2009

Industry grouping sees this as sign of stabilising market

Banks in the UK approved almost a third more loans to buy homes than a year earlier in August in a sign the property market is stabilising, the Council of Mortgage Lenders said.

The number of mortgages granted rose to 52,700, 29 per cent more than in August 2008, the group said in an e-mailed statement yesterday in London. The total fell 5 per cent from July.

‘House purchase activity has revived from its moribund state at the beginning of the year,’ Paul Samter, an economist at the CML, said in the statement.

‘It will be a drawn-out recovery process with seasonal ups and downs, but house purchase activity is now on a firmer footing.’

Yesterday’s report adds to evidence that Britain is emerging from its worst recession in a generation.

Reports this month showed house prices rose in September, while the Bank of England last week stuck to its plan to buy £175 billion (S$386 billion) worth of bonds to cement the recovery and kept the benchmark interest rate at a record low of 0.5 per cent.

The number of people remortgaging their homes declined, the CML said.

Remortgage loans fell to 32,000 in August, down 57 per cent from a year earlier and 22 per cent from July.


A struggle to preserve the view of Mt Fuji


Source : Business Times – 13 Oct 2009

Group of residents faces stiff resistance from officials and developers

Growing up in prewar Tokyo, Makoto Kaneko recalls that the perfectly shaped, snow-capped cone of Mount Fuji was like a constant companion, visible on the horizon from the narrow streets of his hilly working-class neighbourhood.

The most majestic view was from a steep hillside affectionately named Fujimizaka, ‘the slope for seeing Mount Fuji’.

Today, Mr Kaneko’s cramped 80-year-old shop selling foods cooked in soy sauce is one of several old wooden stores and Buddhist temples that still stand here, making the Nippori neighbourhood a rare oasis of medieval charm in Tokyo’s concrete sprawl.

But the distant volcano, Japan’s tallest peak and pre-eminent national symbol, has been increasingly blocked by skyscrapers and smog.

Mr Kaneko said he and other residents did not mind because they still had the vista from Fujimizaka, which has become a minor tourist attraction.

Then, one day a decade ago, they learned of plans for a 14-story apartment building 1.6 kilometres away that would partly obstruct that view.

‘My mind went blank with disbelief,’ said Mr Kaneko, 83.

‘That is when we realised what we were losing.’ With the help of a university professor, the neighbourhood’s mostly greying residents formed the Society to Protect Nippori’s Fujimizaka, which Mr Kaneko leads.

The group has approached developers, landowners and local governments, but their efforts have collided with a preservation problem: Protecting a building or a park may be one thing, but how do you protect a view?

Saving the view from Nippori’s Fujimizaka would require capping building heights within an elongated fan-shaped corridor 4.8 km long and up to 305-metres wide across densely populated neighbourhoods.

So far, the society has met stiff resistance from city officials and developers in Tokyo, whose properties rose rapidly from the postwar ashes thanks in part to unrestrained construction.

‘Tokyo’s approach has been to build first, worry about beauty and preservation later,’ said Kazuteru Chiba, the professor of urban planning at Tokyo’s Waseda University who helped form the Fujimizaka society.

‘This is true even when it involves a national emblem like Mount Fuji.’

Still, the neighbourhood’s cause has slowly gained support in Tokyo, as part of a small but growing clamour to preserve the city’s remaining historical places.

The neighbourhood has benefited from Utagawa Hiroshige, one of Japan’s most celebrated 19th-Century artists, who depicted the view of Mount Fuji from Nippori in a woodblock print.

Local media coverage has also focused on Nippori’s distinction as the last of 16 slopes in central Tokyo named Fujimizaka from which Mount Fuji is still visible.

The naming of hillsides dates to medieval times, as a form of street address before Tokyo’s more recent neighbourhood-based numbering system.

Fujimizaka was the most frequently used name, reflecting the mountain’s sacred place in Japan’s indigenous Shinto religion, according to Noriko Ide, a leader of the Slope Society of Japan, a private group that chronicles the history of hillside names.

‘It is a miracle that one of these slopes has survived,’ Ms Ide said, ’so it is a precious cultural asset.’

The slope also figures prominently in Nippori’s local lore. In the closing days of World War II, a local woman claimed that while standing on the slope, she could see a flash and a funny-shaped cloud just to the right of Mount Fuji – at the exact moment that the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, according to Nobuyuki Nozawa, a local veterinarian.

‘Mount Fuji is like an old friend guarding us,’ he said.

When the Fujimizaka society and local government officials approached the developer of the 14-storey apartment building, they could only ask for his cooperation.

The developer, the real estate arm of what is now the steel maker JFE Holdings, demanded US$12 million in compensation for eliminating the top five floors from the US$16 million building.

With such a sum beyond the society’s means, the developer went ahead with finishing the building in 2000.

It now blocks the left third of Mount Fuji as seen from Nippori’s Fujimizaka.

Prof Chiba said the failure to stop the 14-story building so discouraged residents that the Fujimizaka society almost disbanded.

‘Then we realised there is still two-thirds of the view left. So we decided, let’s protect that,’ he recalled.

The society has tried to increase public awareness by contacting landowners where tall buildings could be built that would block the remaining view.

They also began organising an event called Diamond Fuji, during the two times a year when the sun sets exactly on the top of the volcano’s symmetrical cone.

The last Diamond Fuji, in January, drew 300 people, Mr Kaneko said.

Still, like most residents, Mr Kaneko is far from optimistic. ‘I can’t imagine Nippori without Mount Fuji,’ he said.

‘But it is probably just a matter of time before another building appears that will block what’s left.’


Avoid disputes, book your space online


Source : Straits Times – 13 Oct 2009

THE Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) has granted permission to at least 4,000 motorists wishing to park their vehicles in public parking spaces so far this year.

Last year, it approved 6,000 such applications.

Among the applicants is grocery store owner Uthirabadhi Sivabal.

When he expects a delivery from his suppliers, he logs onto the URA website and books two of the parking spaces in front of his shop at Desker Road for the container truck that delivers the goods.

In the past, Mr Sivabal, 40, used to place white plastic chairs in the spaces to reserve them.

But that led to tiresome arguments with motorists looking for a place to park. ‘Sometimes they even move the chairs away,’ he said.

Since he started booking the spaces nine months ago, such arguments have become a thing of the past. He just whips out his receipt from URA whenever a dispute arises.

‘It’s a small price to pay for the convenience, at $34 for two parking spaces over two days,’ he said.

URA says that while public spaces are meant primarily for parking vehicles, they are occasionally used for other purposes such as loading and unloading, construction and road works as well as for festivals and religious events.

Parking charges depend on the rates at different locations.

The duration of bookings can range from a few days, like in the case of a funeral, to a few months, such as when construction work is being carried out.


Commissions and property agents


Source : Straits Times – 13 Oct 2009

I AM writing in response to last Friday’s letter, ‘1 agent for buyer, seller: OK, but get written consent’, by Singapore Accredited Estate Agencies (SAEA), in reply to my letter on Thursday, ‘Agents shouldn’t take on dual roles’.

I would like to thank SAEA for the prompt response. I also noted an online debate on my letter in The Straits Times discussion board and I am glad the public is taking note of this issue.

First, I would like to clarify that I am not referring to an isolated incident, but a rampant practice or ‘open secret’. My focus is not solely on the agent who acted for me, but rather all the agents I have contacted so far.

I met at least 15 of them (from different property firms) during viewings and spoke to many more on the phone. They would first establish if I am an agent or a buyer, and the tone usually becomes much friendlier when I say I am a buyer. They all have the same message: that I must pay them 1 per cent commission because they need to represent me.

Some participants in the ST discussion board thought I was not willing to pay the 1 per cent commission. I would like to clarify that I am most willing to pay. The point is, I want to pay the agent who is representing me, not the seller’s agent. This is because in cases of dispute (not necessarily legal) such as agreeing on the HDB’s first and second appointment dates, both sides’ interests should be represented by different parties.

SAEA’s advice on the agent getting written approval from both the seller and buyer is not practical because even before you are allowed to view the flat, the seller’s agent will have stated such terms very clearly. And once you view the unit and you wish to make an offer, the agent will once again tell you that you need to engage him as your agent before he relates your offer to the seller.

‘Agents should not insist on representing buyers to obtain a commission, failing which they would not accept any offers to buy on behalf of the sellers,’ wrote SAEA. ‘Such a position is an ethical breach that we do not condone.’

These are statements I fully understand but the question remains: What if they still insist and I desperately like the unit?

I understand that buyers can choose not to purchase the unit or look for their own representing agents, but past experience tells me I will never be able to even view a good unit or close the deal, even though I may offer the highest bid, because the seller’s agent can still choose not to disclose to the seller the highest offer, but rather the offer from other buyers who are willing to engage him for the purchase of the same unit.

Also, relating to the bid for a condominium unit at $690,000, we knew the sale was closed only when my agent called the seller’s agent to check on the status two days after our offer. It was only much later we discovered that the unit was sold at a lower price.

That said, I do not see the need to disclose the details of the agents who acted for me because this involves more than one agent and probably most agents. I suggest SAEA do a mystery caller test, that is, call any agent who has listed a property for sale and pretend to be a buyer. Tell the agent you do not want him to represent you and you will understand what most buyers are going through.

I just wish that clearer rules and better-defined ethical codes of conduct could be put in place soon to stop these practices and close any loopholes.

Kwok Yoke Pui (Ms)


Move to ban ‘one agent for buyer and seller’ under study


Source : Straits Times – 13 Oct 2009

THE Government is contemplating a move to ban property agents from engaging in the widespread practice of representing both the seller and buyer of an HDB flat in the same transaction.

The idea is set to get the thumbs up from home buyers and sellers, but could leave some agents unhappy at a potential loss of commission income.

The proposal was released yesterday by the Ministry of National Development (MND) to raise industry standards. The move would ensure that agents are ‘not in a conflict-of-interest position’, it said.

Currently, many disputes arise because an agent represents both buyer and seller in the same HDB resale transaction.

The practice means the seller’s agent often gets a commission from the buyer as well and may refuse to sell to a certain buyer if no commission can be made.

In other words, the agent may not be trying his best to achieve the best price.

For example, suppose a seller’s agent gets an offer of $300,000 for an HDB flat from a direct buyer willing to pay a commission. He gets to collect 2 per cent in fees from the seller and 1 per cent from the buyer. All up: $9,000 in commission.

But suppose another buyer comes along with his own agent and offers $320,000. Although the price offered is higher, the seller’s agent might refuse to cooperate with the buyer’s agent as the potential commission is lower at $6,400 than if it was a direct buyer.

This practice presents a clear conflict of interest – sellers naturally want the highest price for their property, and buyers want to pay the lowest, MND said in a statement.

‘The same agent cannot possibly discharge his professional duties to both equally and represent both their interests fully.’

However, MND noted that flat buyers may need an agent’s administrative help, and proposes the seller’s agent be paid a fixed administrative fee to help buyers process the paperwork. Alternatively, buyers could engage their own agents or even handle the transactions themselves.

Agency bosses yesterday acknowledged that this move might be unpopular with property agents as it will hit their commission cheques.

‘This could be a big issue for agents since this practice has been adopted for many years now,’ said ERA associate director Eugene Lim. Still, ERA supports the move if it protects the consumer by preventing conflicts of interest, he said.

PropNex chief executive Mohamed Ismail said it is common for some agents to refuse to co-broke in order to earn larger commissions. Co-broking is where a seller has one agent and a buyer another.

‘In the longer term, agents will not lose out as it levels the playing field. All agents will have to co-broke, and everyone will get his rightful commission,’ he said.

Mrs Loh Jo Lyn, 28, is one home buyer who had a bad experience buying an HDB flat when her bid through her agent was rejected by another agent who wanted a direct buyer.

‘This is definitely moving in the right direction. The industry needs more regulation to protect sellers and buyers,’ she said.


Tribunal for real estate sales rows?


Source : Straits Times – 13 Oct 2009

A SPECIAL tribunal might be set up to resolve disputes over residential real estate transactions – replacing the current bewildering hotch potch of options.

This is one of a wide-ranging set of proposals aimed at protecting consumers and lifting standards in the largely fragmented and self-regulating property industry.

Others include: Accrediting all agents, setting up a central registry and instituting a common entrance examination for agents.

The Ministry of National Development (MND) will launch a public consultation exercise for one month from today.

It has just conducted extensive industry consultations on the proposed shake-up. A key impetus for the review, the Government said, has been the high number of complaints in recent years.

To resolve disputes, consumers usually go to the agencies, the industry associations or the Consumers Association of Singapore (Case). Case, for instance, had 727 real estate cases in the first nine months of the year, compared with 1,100 cases last year and 1,055 cases in 2007. It had just 379 cases in 2002.

Case executive director Seah Seng Choon said a tribunal specialising in real estate disputes would help both consumers and agents cut dispute-related costs and, hopefully, speed up resolution.

The Government could help initially by providing start-up funding, but its operation would eventually rest with the industry, it said.

Also, MND said it may be necessary for all agencies to put in place complaints handling processes.

‘The first line of defence should be the agencies, followed by an independent body before the case goes to the tribunal. If not, everybody will be heading straight to the tribunal,’ said Institute of Estate Agents president Jeff Foo.

He added the framework is a ‘good step forward after more than 20 years of self-regulation’.

Another key proposal is mandatory accreditation for agents. The accreditation body – possibly a group of professionals – could keep a public central registry to let agencies assess the background of agents they aim to hire.

This registry could help solve the problem of errant agents who switch from one agency to another undetected or those attached to multiple agencies, experts said.

About 1,700 agencies and 25,000 to 30,000 agents deal in HDB and private homes here.

To add clout to its plan, the Government wants to introduce a regulatory authority, which will be a government agency working with the accreditation body, to set up a disciplinary framework for taking action against errant agents.

For instance, to prevent rogue agents from jumping from one agency to another, MND is thinking of having a demerit points system. These points would stay with the agents and be widely known, MND deputy secretary (development) Tay Lim Heng said yesterday.

Agencies may also face the same disciplinary actions.

Still, some industry sources say more needs to be done. ‘The industry has been pushing for the licensing of individual agents for more than a decade. The basic minimum requirements weeds out only agents who don’t know what they are doing, not the unethical agents,’ said ERA Asia Pacific’s associate director Eugene Lim. ‘The agents have to fear the accreditation body. Otherwise, there is only so much the agencies can do.’

Real Estate Developers Association of Singapore chief executive Steven Choo said: ‘You can’t legislate ethics, but you can transmit knowledge and raise standards of professionalism. No industry matures overnight. Given time, we should be looking at an improved industry.’

Consumers may benefit, but they also have to help make the framework effective. There would be public education outreach programmes to help them understand their responsibilities and rights.

Key elements of the new framework are expected to be out by the end of the year, with the legislative work to be done by the first half of next year. It would be up and running in the second half of the year.

The public can offer feedback on www.mnd.gov.sg


A sterner deal for property agents now


Source : Business Times – 13 Oct 2009

Freelancing may end; agents will have to pass exam

The government has proposed ways to regulate property agents here.

To start with, their activities will be monitored more closely and rules enforced more keenly. A new government agency will be created to take on the enhanced regulatory powers.

A recognised accreditation body for agents will be formed. It will create and maintain a public central registry listing all accredited agents so that consumers are able to ascertain that the agent they engage is qualified.

The Ministry of National Development (MND) is also looking at whether industry players can work with government to set up an independent tribunal specialising in real estate disputes. ‘Such a set-up would send a strong signal on the industry’s commitment to enhance fair dealing and raise professional standards,’ said the ministry.

MND is also proposing that real estate agents should no longer be allowed to be freelancers (agents who are not contracted with any accredited agencies). It also wants to prevent them from representing more than one agency.

Agents must also pass an industry examination and be accredited by the accreditation body (which will be set up next year) before they can practise.

Key elements of the new framework are expected to be announced in December 2009 to January 2010. Legislative enactment is expected by the second half of 2010.

‘The new regulatory framework seeks to achieve two objectives: one, to enable consumers to better safeguard their interests through public education and robust regulations, and two, to increase the professionalism of the real estate industry,’ said MND in a statement yesterday.

The proposed framework comes as the number of complaints against property agents have been rising in recent years. The Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) received 1,100 real estate-related complaints last year, 1,055 in 2007 and 991 in 2006. This year, it received 727 complaints from January to September.

Minister for National Development Mah Bow Tan commented in March this year that the status quo was ‘not tenable’ and that the whole system was ‘not satisfactory’.

With this in mind, MND and other relevant agencies have been studying ways to strengthen the regulatory framework over the past few months. Various stakeholders were consulted, such as industry associations, real estate agency directors, individual agents, Case, and the Real Estate Developers’ Association of Singapore (Redas). MND is now is seeking public feedback.

The framework is likely to focus on residential property transactions as a start as the bulk of complaints are related to purchase of residential properties by individuals – particularly in the HDB resale market.

The proposed framework will also require property firms to take greater responsibility for their agents’ actions. Agencies, for example, will be required to put in place complaints-handling processes, including a mediation platform at the agency level in the event of a dispute.

The regulatory authority will also work with the accreditation body to establish a disciplinary framework to take action against non-compliance or infringement of accreditation requirements. If agencies and/or agents are found to be guilty, they will face disciplinary action in the form of demerit points and possible warnings, fines, suspension and expulsion.

Agencies that are unable to exercise enough control over their agents may also be subject to punitive measures such as restriction on recruiting more agents.

Industry players said that the framework could help usher in better standards of practice to an industry that is right now almost entirely self-regulated. ‘I think the impact will be towards greater professionalism and more protection for the consumer,’ said PropNex CEO Mohamed Ismail.

Market watchers also said that if the proposed regulatory changes are implemented, the number of agents could fall by as much as 20 per cent as those who are not prepared to sit for the industry examination could make an exit. Right now, there are an estimated 25,000 to 30,000 real estate agents in the market with varying degrees of training and professional standards.