Saturday, August 22, 2009

It’s all in the fine print


Source : Today – 22 Aug 2009

Landmark lawsuit over reverse mortgage dispute will set legal precedent here

IN A case that has been touted as the first of its kind in Singapore, a couple have sued NTUC Income for a reverse mortgage deal that turned sour, claiming that the insurer had wrongfully seized their home in 2006.

On Friday, NTUC Income filed its defence, setting the stage for a possible court showdown while maintaining that it is open to an out-of-court settlement.

In their suit, former flight engineer Derek Chua, 72, and his wife Colleen Ng, 57, claim that under a reverse mortgage scheme, Mr Chua could live in the property until he dies or sells it off. Also, the Chuas say in their suit, Income could not force them to repay the loan if it exceeded 80 per cent of the property’s market value.

A reverse mortgage works in the opposite way of a normal home loan. Designed to help those who are cash poor but asset rich, the scheme allows borrowers to receive monthly payouts until the owner dies or the property is sold, or when the tenure expires.

In Mr Chua’s case, the contract he signed with Income did not allow him to owe more than a loan-to-valuation (LTV) ratio of 80 per cent.

The Chuas’ property, at 3 Jalan Lye Kwee, was bought in 1975 and valued at $2.1 million in 1997. NTUC Income then lent the couple up to 80 per cent of the valuation, or $1.68 million. A sum of $2,000 was paid every month to the Chuas.

However, after the Sars crisis in 2003, the property’s value dropped to $1.1 million and the couple were told by Income that they had exceeded the 80 per cent limit. The firm asked Mr Chua to make a lump sum top-up payment of $46,000 to bring the LTV ratio back to within 80 per cent.

During this time, NTUC Income’s lawyers said, monthly payouts were still paid to the couple – although the sum was cut because of the drop in valuation.

In filing its defence, Income also claims that Mr Chua did not pay the top-up despite having been invited to discuss how he could bring the LTV ratio back to within 80 per cent.

The Chuas, NTUC Income alleges, had breached the terms in their mortgage contract, which entitles the insurer to take possession of the property.

NTUC Income adds that it had “granted indulgence” by allowing the couple to sell the property within a time frame, but this was not done as well.

When contacted by Weekend Today, Mr Jeffrey Lee, NTUC Income’s chief financial officer, said: “Even though we believe in the merits of our defence, we maintain a reconciliatory spirit and we continue to be open to exploring an out-of-court settlement.”

NTUC Income is represented by Senior Counsel Sundaresh Menon and Aurill Kam.

The Chuas, who are represented by Senior Counsel Michael Khoo, have 14 days to file a reply.


Ghost town for new launches?

Source : Today – 22 Aug 2009

IF YOU are thinking of shopping for a private property this weekend, you may find your choices limited, as developers seem to be avoiding the start of the Hungry Ghost month when it comes to launching new projects.

The Hungry Ghost month – the seventh month on the lunar calendar – is considered by some to be an inauspicious time to buy new property. This year, the Hungry Ghost month began on Thursday and will end on the Sept 19.

Said Dr Chua Yang Liang, head of research (South-east Asia) at Jones Lang Lasalle: “The cultural taboo is quite strong and developers won’t be deviating from it, as the launches are still aimed at the mass market.”

August is also a traditionally low season for property transactions, and Dr Chua said he will not be surprised to see a pullback in property transactions, given the strong sales figures in July.

But independent property consultant Nicholas Mak said the slowdown in property launches may not be solely due to the Hungry Ghost month.

“Developers might not have any more projects in their pipeline that are ready for the market, after having pushed out (so many) launches over the past few months,” said Mr Mak.

Mr Chong Hock Chang, general manager of business development and marketing at Ho Bee Investment, said: “We look at the situation before making our decisions to launch a development. As our projects are still pending approvals, we cannot launch them, even if demand is good.”

Ho Bee has four upcoming launches listed on its website.

Big players like City Developments Limited (CDL) are not launching projects despite the current strong consumer sentiment. A spokesman from Hong Leong Group, the parent company of CDL, said: “The group is not planning any project launches for the lunar seventh month. An upcoming project by CDL will be a 396-unit residential development on the former Hong Leong Garden condominium site.”

NTUC Choice Homes said it will let buyers preview its 39-storey Trevista condo in Toa Payoh next weekend. The 99-year-leasehold project will have a total of 590 units.

Weekend Today also understands that Singapore Land is expected to launch Trizon, a freehold 289-unit development in the Mount Sinai area, at the end of the month or early next month.
Mr Colin Tan, head of research and consultancy at Chesterton Suntec International, said that despite the Hungry Ghost period, some developers might want to ride on the current bullish trend.

“Sentiment is very hot now. Developers will chase the sentiment as it is an opportunity not to be missed,” he said. He said that in the property boom in 2007, launches still continued throughout the Hungry Ghost month.

In August 2007, a record number of units – 1,723 – were sold. However, this record was eclipsed by the 1,825 units recorded in June this year.

“For the developers that are still holding on to projects that they could not launch during the economic crisis, this is a chance for them to try and sell more units,” said Chesterton’s Mr Tan.
“They will not want to risk it by going into a lull, which is why we might see some launches during or towards the end of the month.”

Sales of existing homes up in US

Source : Business Times – 22 Aug 2009

SALES of existing US homes jumped more than forecast in July to the highest level in almost two years, signalling that the housing crisis that crippled the world’s largest economy is easing.
Purchases climbed 7.2 per cent to a 5.24 million annual rate, the most since August 2007, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) said yesterday. The gain was the biggest since records began in 1999. The median price fell 15 per cent.


‘More and more buyers are becoming convinced that there is not a lot of downside left in the housing market,’ said Ellen Zentner, a senior economist at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ in New York. ‘We can count on housing no longer being a drag.’


Stocks jumped and Treasury securities dropped after the report added to evidence that the housing market was turning.


Economists had forecast that existing home sales would rise to a five million annual rate, according to a Bloomberg News survey. June’s pace was unrevised at 4.89 million.


Sales had reached a 4.49 million pace in January, their lowest level since comparable records began in 1999.


Purchases of existing homes increased 5 per cent compared with a year earlier. The median price dropped to US$178,400 from US$210,100 in July 2008.


The number of previously owned unsold homes on the market jumped 7.3 per cent to 4.09 million in July, a ‘notable’ increase, according to Lawrence Yun, NAR’s chief economist. At the current sales pace, it would take 9.4 months to sell those houses, the same as in June.


A seven months’ supply is usually consistent with stabilisation in prices, Mr Yun said last month.
The share of homes sold as foreclosures or otherwise distressed properties held to 31 per cent in July, he said.


Yesterday’s report showed that sales of existing single- family homes increased 6.5 per cent to an annual rate of 4.61 million. Sales of condominiums and cooperatives climbed 13 per cent to a 630,000 rate.


Purchases increased in three of four regions, led by a 13 per cent jump in the north-east.
Obama administration efforts to revive housing include an US$8,000 federal tax credit for first-time buyers who complete the transaction before Dec 1.


The first-time buyers accounted for about 30 per cent of sales last month and the government’s credit is having a ’significant impact’ on sales, the NAR’s Mr Yun said.

Sales of existing homes up in US

Source : Business Times – 22 Aug 2009


SALES of existing US homes jumped more than forecast in July to the highest level in almost two years, signalling that the housing crisis that crippled the world’s largest economy is easing.
Purchases climbed 7.2 per cent to a 5.24 million annual rate, the most since August 2007, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) said yesterday. The gain was the biggest since records began in 1999. The median price fell 15 per cent.



‘More and more buyers are becoming convinced that there is not a lot of downside left in the housing market,’ said Ellen Zentner, a senior economist at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ in New York. ‘We can count on housing no longer being a drag.’



Stocks jumped and Treasury securities dropped after the report added to evidence that the housing market was turning.



Economists had forecast that existing home sales would rise to a five million annual rate, according to a Bloomberg News survey. June’s pace was unrevised at 4.89 million.



Sales had reached a 4.49 million pace in January, their lowest level since comparable records began in 1999.



Purchases of existing homes increased 5 per cent compared with a year earlier. The median price dropped to US$178,400 from US$210,100 in July 2008.



The number of previously owned unsold homes on the market jumped 7.3 per cent to 4.09 million in July, a ‘notable’ increase, according to Lawrence Yun, NAR’s chief economist. At the current sales pace, it would take 9.4 months to sell those houses, the same as in June.



A seven months’ supply is usually consistent with stabilisation in prices, Mr Yun said last month.
The share of homes sold as foreclosures or otherwise distressed properties held to 31 per cent in July, he said.



Yesterday’s report showed that sales of existing single- family homes increased 6.5 per cent to an annual rate of 4.61 million. Sales of condominiums and cooperatives climbed 13 per cent to a 630,000 rate.



Purchases increased in three of four regions, led by a 13 per cent jump in the north-east.
Obama administration efforts to revive housing include an US$8,000 federal tax credit for first-time buyers who complete the transaction before Dec 1.



The first-time buyers accounted for about 30 per cent of sales last month and the government’s credit is having a ’significant impact’ on sales, the NAR’s Mr Yun said.


Before that house hunt …


Source : Today – 22 Aug 2009


1 Madison Residences by Keppel Land


A new luxury project to hit the market, the 56-unit Madison Residences along Bukit Timah Road was launched last week by Keppel Land. According to property agents, prices for the freehold 18-storey development range between $1,600 psf to $1,700 psf. It features three-bedroom apartments of 1,464 square feet, four-bedroom apartments of 1,776sqf and penthouses of 3,218sqf to 4,407sqf. The nearest train station will be the upcoming Stevens MRT, expected to be completed in 2014.


2 New HSBC home loan package


HSBC has launched a new home loan package with an interest rate of Singapore Inter-Bank Offered Rate (Sibor) plus 1 per cent throughout the loan tenure. The package, available until Sept 30, is applicable to both completed and uncompleted properties with a minimum loan size of $300,000. There is no lock-in period for the package for existing customers, but non-HSBC customers must park at least $50,000 with the bank in deposits.


3 OCBC promotional mortgage rates


Mortgage loan website www.HousingLoanSG.com said that OCBC has introduced promotional rates for mortgages at a 3-month Singapore Swap Offer Rate (SOR) plus 1 per cent throughout the loan tenure. The package is available for both completed and uncompleted properties with a minimum loan size of $1 million.


4 Viva by Allgreen Properties


The final 20 units of Viva, a 235-unit condominium at Suffolk Walk in the Novena area, have been released since last Saturday. Developer Allgreen Properties has already sold more than 90 per cent out of the 215 units launched earlier. The freehold project features units from two-bedrooms (957 – 1,044 square feet) to penthouses (4,900 – 6,400sqf) housed in three 30-storey towers. Prices for the remaining units, mostly on higher floors, range from $1,500 psf to $1,800 psf. The condo, expected for completion in mid 2013, is a short walk away from Novena MRT and shopping malls such as United Square and Velocity.

Helping to file false claim: Appeal court to hear case in rare move

Source : Straits Times – 22 Aug 2009

Convicted lawyer says he is contesting a point of law of public interest

THE Court of Appeal will next week hear a case which may have significant impact in the way lawyers interact with their clients in future.

The case involves lawyer Bachoo Mohan Singh, 61, who was convicted two years ago of helping to file a false claim – an offence which carried a mandatory jail term.

In January this year, he appealed unsuccessfully to the High Court to overturn the decision by the Subordinate Courts.


This would have been the end of the road, as far as legal recourse goes, for Singh.

But in this instance, he applied through the Registrar to have his case heard by the Court of Appeal – Singapore’s highest court, which usually only hears such cases when questions of law of public interest are involved.

He said he was contesting a point of law which had significant public interest.

In a rare move, the court agreed to hear the case. The hearing will allow the three-judge court to consider issues of concern to the legal community here, such as the extent to which lawyers are responsible for verifying claims made by their clients which later turn out to be false.

Currently, lawyers take most statements given to them by clients on faith, and assume them to be true. But if the Court of Appeal agrees with Singh, this may change.

Its views on the case could put both lawyers and their clients on notice that further verification of such claims may be needed to ensure they are accurate.

In dismissing the appeal in January, Justice Tay Yong Kwang noted that Singh’s lawyer had tried to portray the offence his client committed as ‘a legal trap which may cause many an unwary lawyer to falter and fall afoul of the law by the simple act of lodging a claim’ – even if that lawyer reasonably believes such a claim to be true.

But Justice Tay made clear then that ’such a fear is totally unfounded’.

Lawyers said the move to hear the case on appeal would help clarify this issue.

As an indication of how important this case is, the Court of Appeal has asked Senior Counsel Wong Meng Meng, in his capacity as a ‘ friend of the court’, or amicus curiae, to offer the Law Society’s views on how the case has raised issues of public interest.

Mr Wong, founder and consultant of WongPartnership, is vice-president of the Law Society here.
Another indication of the interest of the case to legal circles here is the fact that Senior Counsel Michael Hwang has volunteered to argue Singh’s case for free. Mr Hwang is the Law Society’s president.

Speaking to The Straits Times yesterday, senior lawyer Peter Fernando said Singh’s case ‘is no doubt rare as any further appeal’ after a Magistrate’s hearing must involve a question of law or public interest.

‘It is then for the Court of Appeal to… decide on the merits of the case,’ he said._____

About the case

October 2005: Bachoo Mohan Singh is charged with helping a flat owner make a false claim to the court over the price of the flat in a property transaction.

March 2006 to September 2007: Subsequent trial, conviction and sentence before District Judge Bala Reddy. Singh is sentenced to three months’ jail.

January 2009: He appeals to the High Court. His conviction is upheld, but the three-month sentence is cut to a month’s jail and a $10,000 fine.

April 2009: Singh applies to refer issues of law in his case to the Court of Appeal, but Justice Tay Yong Kwang rejects this. On the same day, he applies directly to the Court of Appeal.
May 2009: He writes to Justice Tay to re-open the case and is refused.

He is currently out on $125,000 bail pending the Court of Appeal hearing next week.

Property sales gains: No tax law changes

Source : Straits Times – 22 Aug 2009

Govt accepts feedback and leaves current framework alone
The Government has decided to back away from changes it had proposed to tax laws dealing with gains made from property sales.

The public consultation process for the proposal attracted 64 responses with 60 opposing the change.

The Finance Ministry (MOF) said yesterday that ‘on balance, it [is] best to retain the current framework of income tax treatment for individuals who sell their properties’.

It said that it had received ’salient public feedback’ and saw merit in the points raised.

Dr Steven Choo, chief executive of the Real Estate Developers’ Association of Singapore (Redas), welcomed yesterday’s move, adding that he appreciated the Government’s ‘consultative approach and understanding of the industry’s concern on the matter’.

Under the proposal, an individual who sells a property would not be taxed on the profit if he had not sold any other property in the preceding four years.

The measure sparked considerable unease and a two-day slump in property shares when news of it broke last month. Investors initially viewed it as a back-door attempt to impose a capital gains tax or a pre-emptive strike against property speculators.

The ministry’s subsequent clarifications and reassurances about the proposals calmed much of those concerns but public feedback was mostly not in support of the move.

In a statement yesterday, MOF said there was feedback that the proposed change ‘could bias purchase decisions towards investing in one bigger property, rather than numerous smaller properties’.

Respondents also noted that there were many other factors that should allow property sellers to escape tax on a gain other than considering the frequency of their sales.

These include owners who might have held a property for a long time before selling it together with another property within the same four-year period. The circumstances that led to the sale could also be significant.

‘To cater to all such factors would not be straightforward, and would make the income tax treatment for property disposals complex,’ said MOF.

It said concerns had also been raised about the ‘inadvertent uncertainty for individuals who sell more than one property within any four years, even though there was no change to the current income tax treatment for such cases’.

Dr Choo of Redas pointed out that for most individuals, property is not so much a ‘tradeable commodity but a long-term investment’.

Mr Tan Tiong Cheng, chairman of property consultancy Knight Frank, added: ‘The current tax treatment on treating property sales gains has worked well and there is no need to tweak it further.’

KPMG’s head of tax services, Mr Owi Kek Hean, noted that the Government had listened to public feedback in deciding not to go ahead with the proposed tax change.

‘This is a clear demonstration of how the Government takes differing views on board in its formulation and changes it proposed to tax policy,’ he said.

When, how or if to tax property gains is clearly a vexing issue.

MOF said that it had also considered alternatives to give property sellers certainty on when they would not be taxed on the gains but it noted that these alternatives ‘bring drawbacks and complexities of their own’.

The scrapping of the proposed changes means the prevailing tax regime remains in place.
Singapore has no capital gains tax but the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore assesses a small number of individuals – those who regularly transact in property – each year. It uses yardsticks like the circumstances that led to the sale to determine if the profits should be taxed at the appropriate income tax rate.

High HDB prices: Squeezed even harder

Source : Straits Times – 22 Aug 2009

THE HDB resale price index has surged relentlessly since 2007. Since the first quarter of 2007, the index has increased 35.3 per cent and is now at a record high, even though the economy is still recovering from downturn.

This is an anomaly the Government should examine.

The recent Punggol Residences launch by HDB, which drew seven applications for every unit on sale, is another case to show the Government needs to increase supply to prevent housing prices escalating further.

While there is the additional housing grant to help the lower-income group, I urge the Government not to overlook the sandwich class group – those who are not eligible for subsidised public housing, yet cannot afford private housing. The escalation of mass market property prices has made the dream of owning a private property even more distant.

I urge the Government to reconsider the income ceiling of $8,000 as a criterion to be eligible for the Central Provident Fund (CPF) housing grant, which has been in place since 1994. Since 1994, the CPF Ordinary Account contribution rate has decreased from 30 per cent to 23 per cent and the HDB resale housing index has almost doubled from 75.5 to 140.2.

The supply of executive condominiums has also come to a halt. For those who aspire to condo living, Design, Build and Sell Scheme units launched by private developers range in prices from $550,000 to $720,000. Given the income ceiling of $8,000, couples who buy such flats must take huge loans which may not be proportionate to their income.

I urge the Government to look into the following to help the sandwich class:

~ Raise the income ceiling of $8,000 to take into account the almost doubling of housing prices, as well as general inflation;~ Increase the supply of executive condominiums;~ Increase the supply of new public housing so unsuccessful applicants for new HDB flats will not put additional upward pressure on the resale housing market; and~ Implement anti-speculation measures to cool down private property prices.

Given that the HDB resale index may be a lagging indicator since resale transactions entered by buyer and seller may take up to three months before HDB approves the resale application, the housing price index is even higher than it appears. It is already common in the resale market for sellers to ask cash over valuation ranging from $15,000 to $30,000.

The Government is encouraging families to procreate, but imagine what future generations will have to fork out to own a place that they call home.
Chew Kim Cheer

Two shortcomings

Source : Straits Times – 22 Aug 2009

‘Public housing too correlated to private market, and HDB has not regulated supply in line with immigration and demographic trends.’

MR TREVOR TAN: ‘Thursday’s report, ‘Cash upfront for HDB resale flats doubles in a month’, suggests that the recent ramp-up in HDB prices during the most severe recession since Independence signals that the system requires a thorough review. Two failings come to mind – that public housing has become too correlated to the private market, and that HDB has not regulated its supply in line with immigration and demographic trends. As housing is the largest financial obligation for most Singaporeans, I fear this ramp-up in prices will create a batch of young couples who are too highly leveraged and tied to their mortgages. Come the next economic downturn, we will have a demographic group unable to deal with the loss of their jobs, as they will be laden with other obligations such as their children and ageing parents.’

Property market not over-exuberant? You’re kidding, Mr Kwek

Source : Straits Times – 22 Aug 2009

I READ, with great scepticism, the report on Singapore property, ‘Property scene not too frothy: CDL’ (Aug 14).

Mr Kwek Leng Beng, City Developments (CDL) chairman, said there was no over-exuberance in the property market.

All around me I see buyers making or trying to make a quick buck from a buy-sell transaction in just a couple of months. I have seen at least five instances in landed property in this past week where buyers who bought over the past two months are now selling the same property for a quick profit of 20 to 30 per cent.

For example, one bought a small detached house in Duchess Avenue for $5 million and is now selling it for $6 million after a few weeks. Another who bought a bigger detached house in Dyson Road for $6.8 million is now selling it for $9.8 million, after three months.

I am not sure why is this happening when the economy is still on the mend, but it seems there is much speculation in the property market right now. Perhaps such transactions will attract the attention of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore with reference to capital tax gains?

Whether buyers will succumb to such high asking prices depends on whether there is panic buying out of fear of fast-rising prices despite the downturn. Where are the fundamentals to support such high increases in prices over a few months?

It was thus refreshing to read the report on Monday, ‘Mass-market home prices ‘at 2007 peak”, on an RBS analyst who seems more objective and makes more sense. This will perhaps help Singaporeans to be more rational and not jump in when the water is already too hot. The bad outcome from this would be runaway asset inflation and Singapore would lose its competitiveness yet again.

We really appreciate this report.
Wong Chui Lin (Ms)

Property market not over-exuberant? You’re kidding, Mr Kwek


Source : Straits Times – 22 Aug 2009


I READ, with great scepticism, the report on Singapore property, ‘Property scene not too frothy: CDL’ (Aug 14).


Mr Kwek Leng Beng, City Developments (CDL) chairman, said there was no over-exuberance in the property market.


All around me I see buyers making or trying to make a quick buck from a buy-sell transaction in just a couple of months. I have seen at least five instances in landed property in this past week where buyers who bought over the past two months are now selling the same property for a quick profit of 20 to 30 per cent.


For example, one bought a small detached house in Duchess Avenue for $5 million and is now selling it for $6 million after a few weeks. Another who bought a bigger detached house in Dyson Road for $6.8 million is now selling it for $9.8 million, after three months.


I am not sure why is this happening when the economy is still on the mend, but it seems there is much speculation in the property market right now. Perhaps such transactions will attract the attention of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore with reference to capital tax gains?


Whether buyers will succumb to such high asking prices depends on whether there is panic buying out of fear of fast-rising prices despite the downturn. Where are the fundamentals to support such high increases in prices over a few months?


It was thus refreshing to read the report on Monday, ‘Mass-market home prices ‘at 2007 peak”, on an RBS analyst who seems more objective and makes more sense. This will perhaps help Singaporeans to be more rational and not jump in when the water is already too hot. The bad outcome from this would be runaway asset inflation and Singapore would lose its competitiveness yet again.


We really appreciate this report.
Wong Chui Lin (Ms)

Homes more affordable as incomes rise

Source : Straits Times – 22 Aug 2009

Relatively cheaper than in 1996 boom year, data from two reports say

PRIVATE home prices may be on the rise again but new data suggest home buyers swept up in the latest frenzy are not necessarily overstretching themselves.

Buyers are finding condominiums far more affordable relative to their income now than they did during the mass market property boom of 1996, thanks to strong wealth creation in recent years.

This is the conclusion of separate new figures from financial giant Citigroup and property consultancy Jones Lang LaSalle.

Citigroup economist Kit Wei Zheng said: ‘Today, the average condominium is probably selling for around 19 times the annual income of the average Singaporean. While this is by no means cheap, it is still significantly lower than the peak of over 40 times in 1996, and around 24 times in 2007, though obviously higher than the lows of around 15 times from 2003-2006.’

Mr Kit’s study looked at absolute prices rather than the price per square foot.

His measure of affordability does not take account of a couple of factors boosting affordability in the current market.

First, the average condo buyer earns a higher-than-average wage, and is likely to have enjoyed faster wages growth.

Second, interest rates are far lower now than in 1996 and 2007. Analysts say this is helping to fuel demand.

Also, Mr Kit’s study uses average income, which could be significantly higher than the median – or midpoint – given the widening gap between rich and poor.

As well, he uses the average selling price of condos, which also could be higher than the median as the former is pulled up by the sale of expensive prime units, especially in recent years.

Jones Lang LaSalle compiles an affordability index looking mainly at the interaction between economic growth rates, housing prices and mortgage rates.

Its index has been falling since 2007.

It now shows private mass market homes are more affordable to first-time home buyers and HDB upgraders than in 2007 or 1996, said the firm’s head of research for South-east Asia, Dr Chua Yang Liang.

For HDB upgraders, affordability has improved a lot more than for first-time home buyers because HDB prices have risen substantially, he said.

Overall, strong wealth creation in recent years has also helped. Total economic output, or gross domestic product (GDP), per capita was $50,022 last year – exceeding the 15-year average of $40,866 by 22 per cent, said Dr Chua. Private apartment or condo prices have surpassed the 15-year average by just 16 per cent, he said.

The Urban Redevelopment Authority price index – designed to give a broad indication of price trends for private homes – fell 4.7 per cent in the second quarter.

A URA spokesman said prices for both uncompleted and completed projects still fell over the quarter even though some developers are raising prices for selected projects with good take-up.
Still, consultancies say home prices rose in the second quarter from the first.

Property consultant Nicholas Mak said more suburban condos are being launched at higher prices than in 1996.

However, ‘at the moment, prices in most projects are still within fundamental levels, even though many people have their pay frozen or cut and rents have fallen’, said DTZ’s head of South-east Asia research, Ms Chua Chor Hoon.

‘This is because income and rents had risen in the last few years when the economy was doing well; hence there was fat to cushion this current downturn.’

Mr Kit said: ‘Put another way, in nine out of the past 11 years, growth in wages has outpaced growth in property prices.’

Households also have far less debt than five or six years ago, with the household debt to GDP ratio falling from over 96 per cent in 2003, to about 70 per cent today.

These factors, combined with a resilient labour market, helped lift demand.

Also, many projects now have smaller units. ‘The new projects may look very affordable if you consider the absolute amount paid but you’re buying a smaller apartment,’ said Mr Mak.
The future, though, is hazy.

Many analysts think price growth is unlikely to be sustainable if the economic recovery is slow and incomes do not keep pace.

‘You can identify a bubble only retrospectively but I think we can’t deny that one could be forming as the recent uplift in home prices and volume is not accompanied by a broad-based economic recovery,’ said Dr Chua.

Mr Kit said: ‘The uncertainty lies in whether the current demand will be sufficiently sustained to absorb the substantial pipeline of new supply coming onstream, especially if interest rates rise, or when prices become substantially less affordable to the average home buyer.’

East Shore Hospital gets makeover

Source : Straits Times – 22 Aug 2009

EAST Shore Hospital, nestled in Telok Kurau for the last 70 years, was in need of a makeover.
It is now getting a thorough one, with chief executive officer Michael Tan at the helm.

Dr Tan, 36, who took charge last September, wants to turn the women and children’s hospital into a general hospital, offering also aesthetic medicine, neurology and dermatology.

It will grow physically, with more beds being added.

Also in Dr Tan’s vision: personalised service, like what boutique hotels give.

The hospital’s new focus and mission will be matched with a new look. Renovations – running into a seven-digit figure – will be completed by next year.

A name change is also planned, but Dr Tan is tight-lipped about it; he will only say it will be revealed in an opening ceremony in two months.

The hospital took on its current name in 1989. Parkway Holdings bought it in 1995.

From 1983 to 1988, it was known as the American Hospital; and from 1974 to 1979, it was St Mark’s Hospital.

Further back in its history, the hospital had started out as Paglar Maternity and Nursing Home.
Dr Tan first visited the hospital more than a decade ago, when he was a houseman. He told The Straits Times that his impression then was that the place seemed to have been stuck in a time capsule for the longest time.

A family physician by training, he was previously vice-president of the business unit of Parkway Shenton, the Parkway group’s general practitioner chain.

Improvements to East Shore are already visible. Outside, the building is getting a new coat of paint – blue and gold.

Inside, the lobby has modern furnishings. The old canteen and in-house pharmacy have made way for a cafeteria, Delifrance and My Toast outlets and a Guar-dian pharmacy.

A VIP suite, for patients who are prepared to pay a premium, is being added. It will have two wings – one for the patients and the other for their families.

Other wards will be renovated next year.

In the longer term, the existing 153-bed hospital will have 100 to 150 more beds – made possible by moving the hospital carpark to land leased from a nearby hostel.

New specialist clinics for sports medicine, dermatology, ophthalmology and neurology will be set up in the medical suite wing, to be spruced up with new wallpaper and furnishings.

To make way for these clinics, some members of the administrative staff have moved out to a leased area nearby.

Dr Tan is also exploring other ways to create more room for beds and suites – perhaps by buying the neighbouring land or expanding vertically, though he may be hampered by the height limits in the neighbourhood.

The improvements will cost but, he said, charges will be maintained for now.

The rates now range from $135 for a four-bedder room to $410 for a single room.

One patient who has noticed the changes is vehicle mechanic Soon Lian Hee, 55, who was there recently to consult a specialist.

He had not visited the hospital for some time and was impressed by the new decor and improved services.

He said: ‘I had mentioned to the woman at the counter that I was hungry, and without my even asking, she gave me directions on where to go. The service has improved.’

En bloc appeal triggers legal questions

Source : Straits Times – 22 Aug 2009

Judge wonders whether Joo Chiat property falls under Act after plea by sole objector
A JOO CHIAT resident, opposing the collective sale of his apartment, took the case to the High Court, citing procedural irregularities and claiming that the manner of distributing the sale proceeds was unfair.

But at a hearing yesterday, the judge raised questions about whether such a property could be allowed under the law to be sold en bloc.

Justice Andrew Ang was hearing an appeal by Mr Goh Teh Lee, 52, the sole objector, against the decision of the Strata Titles Boards (STB) which approved the sale of the property in Koon Seng Road.

The collective sale of the houses and apartments was mooted at a residents’ meeting in November 2006.

The property consists of 24 apartments in a four-storey block – known as Koon Seng House – and nine pre-war terrace houses on the same plot of freehold land.

The terrace houses are owned by a single owner. The apartments, owned by different individuals, have a 999,999-year lease with no share in the land.

But in court yesterday, Justice Ang wondered whether such a property fell within the provisions of the Land Titles (Strata) Act, which sets out situations in which en bloc sales can be carried out.
The judge adjourned the case, telling lawyer Cheah Kok Lim, who represents the majority owners, to come back with submissions on the issue. Mr Goh is not represented by a lawyer.

Mr Goh, who co-owns an apartment with his wife, objected to the sale but his wife had given her agreement.

He argued that it was unfair for the purchase price of $21.12 million to be divided equally among the 33 units.

Mr Goh asserted that there were discrepancies in the collective sale agreement, such as dodgy signatures.

He contended that the deal was not transparent as the minutes of the first meeting were not circulated to all owners and the sale committee had acted too hastily by appointing the property agent and lawyer for the deal on the same night the committee was formed.

He also alleged that the majority owners made false declarations to STB.

STB disagreed and ordered the sale in December. Mr Goh then appealed to the High Court to reverse the decision.

Yesterday, Justice Ang asked Mr Goh point-blank if he was objecting because he did not want to sell or because he wanted more money.

Mr Goh replied that he did not want to sell.

The judge took pains to warn him that if he lost, he had to bear the legal costs; but if the majority lost, they could share these costs.

The judge also explained that if he eventually ruled that there was no law to allow the en bloc sale, all the owners may be stuck with their properties.

‘Don’t be the architect of your own defeat,’ he said.

Anticipating, accelerating, accentuating

Source : Business Times – 22 Aug 2009

CapitaCommercial Trust shares its ‘triple-A strategy’ for riding through challenging times
FOR a sector that looked extremely vulnerable during the worst of the credit crisis, most real estate investment trusts (Reits) in Singapore managed to turn in steady results in the second quarter of this year.

CapitaCommercial Trust (CCT) was one that met or exceeded analysts’ expectations. Riding on higher rental income and better operating margins, its Q2 distributable income and distribution per unit (DPU) each rose around 33 per cent from a year ago.

But are the skies clear for Reits? Analysts have flagged other challenges to maintaining distributions in a subdued economy – rents are likely to keep sliding and acquisitions may still be hard to carry out.

CCT adopts a ‘triple-A strategy’ in such times, says Lynette Leong, CEO of trust manager CapitaCommercial Trust Management. ‘We anticipate, accelerate and accentuate.’

Debt refinancing

Some Reits borrowed to buy assets in recent years, and funding became a big concern after credit markets froze. According to a DBS Vickers report in December last year, the sector had some $4.9 billion due in 2009 alone. CCT saw credit illiquidity coming and prepared for it, says Ms Leong. ‘We looked at our debt maturity profile and saw there were large chunks of debt due for refinancing. Anticipating the credit weakness ahead, we refinanced the debt well ahead of maturity and at relatively attractive terms.’

CCT had about $740 million of debt maturing in 2009 but had completely refinanced it by June this year, she adds.

Besides CCT, several other Reits rolled over their debt or raised cash through rights issues. The broad demonstration of funding availability has eased market fears.

But one other dark cloud looms – the prognosis for the office sector is bleak because of weak demand for space during the downturn, as more supply comes on stream. Prime office rents here have plunged almost 50 per cent from the peak in Q3 2008.

But CCT prepared for this. ‘If office rents decline, distributions will decline as well,’ says Ms Leong. ‘We had to see how we could supplement our income.’

To expand its income stream, CCT acquired One George Street for more than $1.1 billion last year.

The Grade A office building was a ‘compelling’ buy because it fitted well with the existing portfolio, she says. Also, the seller and trust sponsor CapitaLand offered five-year yield protection until July 2013.

Lease renewals

Expecting rents to soften, CCT also engaged tenants to renew their leases early, Ms Leong says. ‘The intent was to lock in rental income in advance and maintain a high occupancy rate. This in turn helps to maintain a well-spread lease expiry profile so there is no lumpiness in any given year.’

For instance, as at June, CCT had renewed more than half of the leases expiring this year.
CCT is also working to rein in costs. It has deferred non-critical capital expenditure and obtained bulk discounts on utility charges. The efforts are showing through improved operating margins – for the first half, net property income rose 42 per cent year on year as gross revenue grew 36 per cent.

CCT also has a pro-active capital management strategy, says Ms Leong. The trust raised $828 million through a rights issue in June and used $664 million to repay debt. It also earmarked a significant portion of the balance to further reduce borrowings. This will lead to a drop interest costs.

The move has cut CCT’s gearing to 31 per cent. ‘Market conditions are still uncertain,’ says Ms Leong. ‘We don’t know what’s going to happen next year, so the most prudent way is to de-leverage and maintain our gearing at the low end of our target range of 30-45 per cent through market cycles.’

Lower costs are critical to offset any decline in revenue from weaker rents. Some analysts are expecting negative rental reversions in 2010 as leases signed at the peak of the property market come up for renewal. ‘While rents – the top line – may decline, if we’re able to save on operating expenses and interest costs, then we are able to deliver on the stability and DPU,’ Ms Leong says.

Tenant retention

Then there is customer service, which contributes to tenant retention and ’should not be compromised, especially in weak market conditions,’ she says. As part of its customer service focus, CCT’s property manager has ISO 14000 and S-Class service certifications.

While Singapore’s economy may have got through the worst, ‘we are still not completely out of the woods’, Ms Leong reckons. As a result, CCT will remain cautious about expanding its portfolio. ‘Any immediate acquisition will be counter-productive to our rights issue,’ she says. ‘We will continue to monitor the markets for acquisition opportunities but will not proceed unless there is certainty of market recovery and the acquisition is compelling.’

More foreign investors snapping up homes here

Source : Straits Times – 22 Aug 2009

Buyers from the region are returning now that prices have corrected

THE number of foreign buyers in Singapore’s property market shot up in the second quarter, but they are not quite the high-spending ones seen during the 2007 boom, according to property experts.

The globe-trotting high-spenders flocked to Singapore in droves then, helping to lift high-end prices even higher and setting record highs. It was not just individuals and funds – foreign developers also wanted a slice of the action.

A recent study by consultancy Jones Lang LaSalle found that foreign buyers – including permanent residents – lodged 1,662 caveats in the second quarter of this year, up from 489 caveats in the first quarter.

It was the highest quarterly sales figure since the third quarter of 2007 when 2,444 caveats were lodged.

In the second quarter of this year, the proportion of foreign buyers to Singaporeans and corporate buyers rose to 22 per cent, from 17 per cent in the last quarter.

It hit about 30 per cent during the previous boom.

Jones Lang LaSalle head of South-east Asia research, Dr Chua Yang Liang, said foreigners are beginning to return now that the worst of the financial crisis seems to be over and property prices have corrected.

‘The price correction following the Lehman collapse last year has brought average resale values of non-landed prime properties in Singapore down 31 per cent from the peak. As long as prices remain stable and do not increase too drastically, foreign buying interests can be expected to continue,’ said Dr Chua.

More foreigners bought higher-priced properties of between $1.5 million and $5million from April to June, compared with the first quarter, when most foreign buyers bought homes in the $500,000 to $1 million bracket.

But there was only a moderate rise in the number of those who bought homes priced at $5 million or more.

The largest group of foreign buyers here is still the Malaysians but Singapore also draws buyers from Indonesia and, in recent years, from China and India.

‘We are seeing more foreign buyers from around the region, but not so much yet from the rest of the world,’ noted Savills Residential director Phylicia Ang.

Market experts say more will come once there are clearer signs of recovery.

POTENTIAL DEMAND

‘We are seeing more foreign buyers from around the region, but not so much yet from the rest of the world.’ – Savills Residential director Phylicia Ang

7 types of buyers in the market

Source : Straits Times – 22 Aug 2009

1 SPECULATORS

These are the people who buy property with a view to flipping it to make a quick profit.
They have no intention of actually living in their property. As long as they can make money from the property, its design or layout is of little importance.

Some speculators have even bought units without bothering to step into the showflats, while others have sold homes only hours after buying them.

This is the group you can count on for the queues, blank cheques and recession-defying rise in prices.

They can continue playing the market as long as their actions do not get out of control.

2 SPECU-VESTORS

Coined in recent years, this term refers to those who buy to flip but can afford to hold on to their investment if necessary.

Property consultants use it to differentiate a new group of speculators with financial muscle from those who were active during the boom – or rather bubble – of 1996.

3 INVESTORS

Investors buy property with a long-term view. They intend to either rent it out to earn a regular monthly income, or sell it at the best time for capital appreciation.

Seasoned investors are likely to do their own research and consider more carefully than speculators the attributes of the property.

4 INVESTOR-OCCUPIERS

Such buyers are typically first-time investors. They do not mind staying in their property if they have problems selling or renting it out.

They may be risk-averse or have a marginal interest in investing, but nonetheless want to benefit from any rise in values.

5 OWNER-OCCUPIERS

Perhaps the pickiest of buyers, they are looking for a home to live in.

Timing is less of an issue for this group of buyers, given that their needs come first. They can take forever to find the right property.

During times of uncertainty, when investors prefer to stay on the sidelines, this is a group well-loved by sellers.

They are happy to sell in a rising market, even though they will usually have to buy a replacement property.

6 FOREIGN BUYERS

There are two groups of such buyers. One is made up largely of buyers from Malaysia and Indonesia who have long bought into the Singapore market.

They usually have family, friends or businesses here.

The other is made up largely of high-spending foreigners who were only recently attracted to Singapore because of its growth.

Although there is not much evidence at the present time, the second group of foreigners buys a property here for investment purposes, to speculate or as a second or third home.

These foreigners bought up a lot of the ultra-posh homes during the 2007 boom and were responsible for the previous high-end boom.

Obviously, property developers – particularly those with swanky projects in the pipeline – can’t wait to welcome them back to Singapore.

7 PROPERTY AGENTS

There are as many as 30,000 agents in Singapore today. Although their job is to serve the types of buyers mentioned above, some of them cannot resist a good buy when they see one.

‘It is not surprising that some agents invest as the agents are in the position to sniff out the best buys,’ says ERA Asia-Pacific associate director Eugene Lim.

They get the first bite of the cherry at new launches – although not necessarily at a better price.

Homes near MRT stations on right track

Source : Straits Times – 22 Aug 2009

They are easier to rent out; fetch higher prices

TWO property developers were recently in the spotlight for including unconfirmed locations of future MRT stations in their condominium advertisements.

The incident clearly highlighted the popularity of housing developments located near MRT stations.

Property agents say the benefits of such a location are myriad, though buyers can expect to pay significantly more for such properties.

‘Singapore has a very comprehensive MRT network which is constantly being expanded, and being near an MRT station will reduce travelling time,’ said Mr Eugene Lim, associate director of ERA Asia Pacific. He added that this is a key factor in the attractiveness of such properties to owner-occupiers and tenants.

Property agents The Straits Times spoke to said that buyers can expect to pay a premium of $10,000 to $15,000, or 5 to 15 per cent of the purchase price, for HDB flats located near MRT stations. For private properties, this premium ranges from $20,000 to $50,000.
This is a premium based not just on convenience; there are several other long-term benefits that come with a location near an MRT station.

‘Flats near MRT stations are definitely easier to rent out,’ said Mr Adam Tan, spokesman for property firm Propnex. Non-Singaporeans working here make up more than 50 per cent of the rental market, and to them, ‘public transport is key’ as they are unlikely to want to purchase a car, he noted.

‘For young expat foreigners with no kids, good schools mean nothing. In contrast, the MRT will link them to work and wherever they need to go,’ he added.

The resale value of properties located close to MRT stations is also higher. Coupled with the fact that a number of MRT stations are located in the heart of town centres, it is no surprise that properties close to these stations are more popular and command higher premiums.

‘Other amenities such as shopping malls and offices near the MRT station will definitely drive up demand and price,’ said Mr Tan.

For a property to be considered near an MRT station, it should be within walking distance of five to eight minutes, or within a 0.5km to 1km radius around the station.

A few additional minutes spent walking make a big difference in price. Property agents say that a property located five minutes away from an MRT station will command a selling price 10 per cent above one that is located 15 minutes away. This premium rises to 15 per cent compared to a property 25 minutes away.

ERA’s Mr Lim noted that a flat within five to eight minutes’ walk of Tampines Central, now home not just to Tampines MRT station but also three shopping malls and a number of offices, would easily have a resale value of about $20,000 more than a flat of the same age located in a more inaccessible part of the estate.

In addition to the perks that come with convenience, purchasing a property close to an MRT station is a sound investment decision.

Mr Tan cited Astoria Park, near Kembangan MRT station, as an example of a property whose value is likely to appreciate significantly. Units there sold for about $630 per sq foot about six months ago, and are now selling for about $750 psf. Mr Tan said prices of similar developments close to MRT stations should appreciate by 20 to 30 per cent over the next 10 years.

All the agents The Straits Times spoke to agreed that there will always be a demand for properties located close to MRT stations, regardless of market conditions.

But while proximity to MRT stations is a perk, it is possible to be too close. One property agent said that residents of some units in The Jade, a condo development situated right next to Bukit Batok MRT station, have to put up with beeping noises from the station and the roar of trains passing by.

‘You definitely should not be getting a place right next to an MRT station if you want total peace and quiet,’ said Mr Tan.

1 semi-D + 1 cluster house = 1 flat and $700k loss

Source : Straits Times – 22 Aug 2009

In mid-1990s, many made mistake of thinking prices would keep going up
IN 1995, Mr Zachary Tsai (not his real name) paid nearly $1.3 million for a second house. A general manager with a manufacturing company in his early 40s, he earned a five-figure salary and lived in a semi-detached house he owned in Upper East Coast with his wife and four children.

But pressured by his ‘rich and successful’ friends, he decided to pool his hard-earned savings of $300,000 with his sister to put down a deposit on a three-storey cluster house in Kew Gate, a 31-unit leasehold development in the Upper East Coast area.

Intending to sell it about 10 years later, and confident of being able to repay the mortgage and make a handsome profit, he took out a 90 per cent bank loan.

Any thought that he would lose his job and house prices would drop like a stone never occurred to him. But the unthinkable became an unpleasant reality.

In 2001, after his employer merged with another company, he lost his job.

He managed to cover monthly payments on the loan with the remnants of his savings, but that did not leave much for his family.

Desperate to make ends meet, he tried to sell the cluster house in which his sister and mother had been living, but for two long years was unable to do it.

Although he managed to secure a new job in 2003, his salary barely covered the monthly payments. Then the Sars crisis hit and property prices plunged further, recalls Mr Tsai, who is now an operational manager in his late 50s. He eventually disposed of the house at a bank foreclosure sale in 2003 for $680,000 – almost half of the original value and $300,000 below valuation. In total, he lost about $700,000 on the house.

The Tsais, who had to sell their semi-detached home to pay off the debt, now own and live in a five-room HDB flat – also in the Upper East Coast area – bought with Mr Tsai’s Central Provident Fund savings. ‘I’ve dreamed of owning private property again and going back to a semi-D. But next time I’m not going to think twice – I’m going to think three or four times,’ Mr Tsai says.

Home owner M.K. Kung, 42, has also been hit by shrinking values.

She purchased a two-bedder at Yio Chu Kang condo Seasons Park in 1996 with her husband for about $700,000. They are still living there with their child, but she reckons the apartment is now worth only $650,000 or less.

‘We have been thinking of upgrading, but it’s not easy to sell something when you know you’re going to make a loss on it,’ says the public accounting executive.

Mr Tsai and Mrs Kung – along with thousands of others – had bought into what PropNex chief executive officer Mohamed Ismail terms ‘the myth that prices would only keep going up’.
‘Prior to that we had little experience of prices being crushed. Queueing up for two, three days was common, and queue spots were changing hands for $15,000 to $30,000,’ he says. Some property analysts draw parallels with the upbeat market we have today, but are keen to point out differences between the last property crash and today’s situation.

DTZ’s head of South-east Asia research Chua Chor Hoon says: ‘The market right now is reminiscent of 1996 in atmosphere with the queues, the packed showrooms and good take-up rates for popular projects.

‘But the level of speculation now has not reached the feverish state seen in 1996 and it’s still too early to tell whether it will turn out the same way.”

Dr Chua Yang Liang, head of Southeast Asia research at Jones Lang LaSalle, agrees: ‘It seems that there is a market euphoria that is quite similar to that in 1996…but the market fundamentals are quite different.’

What may cut the danger of another crash is the fact that properties in many areas are still worth less than at the time of their launch, while others have made only relatively small gains. Prices still have a lot of catching up to do, just to make up for inflation over the years.

Recent transaction data from the Urban Redevelopment Authority website shows that suburban properties launched in 1996 lost more value over the past 13 years than those in prime districts, some of which have actually risen in value.

Prices at Seasons Park, where Mrs Kung lives, have fallen from $610-$670 per sq ft (psf) at launch to around $520 psf now. And Hougang Green units now fetch around $520 psf, down from their average launch price of $560 psf.

At Ardmore Park in Orchard, however, the 2,885 sq ft apartments, launched at an average of $1,850 psf in 1996, have been selling for $1,976-$2,513 psf since August last year.

‘The average price of resale leasehold suburban properties in the second quarter of this year was about a quarter below that in the second quarter of 1996; whereas the average price of resale freehold properties in prime districts in the second quarter of this year was about 5 to 10 per cent above that in the second quarter of 1996,’ Ms Chua points out.

Ms Tay Huey Ying, director for research and consultancy at Colliers International, explains: ‘Prime district prices recovered in the property boom of 2007 but the mass market recovery came later and was short-lived due to the United States sub-prime mortgage crisis.’

Current launches in suburban areas, such as Optima in Tanah Merah and Centro Residences in Ang Mo Kio, have sold for about $810 psf and around $1,170 psf respectively, on average. These are record prices in their districts.

Asked whether such new launches are overvalued, Dr Chua says: ‘It’s hard to tell now. There are no signs pointing to a major correction…but I don’t think the current rate of price increase is sustainable if it is not supported by economic growth.’

NOT MAKING THE SAME MISTAKE AGAIN
‘I’ve dreamed of owning private property again and going back to a semi-D. But next time, I’m not going to think twice – I’m going to think three or four times.’ - Mr Zachary Tsai (not his real name), whose investment in a second house ended with him losing both properties when he hit a series of rough patches

Ex-Parkway boss in $48m Hilltops deal


Source : Business Times – 22 Aug 2009


A GROUP led by former Parkway Holdings boss Tony Tan is understood to have picked up 18 apartments in the sub-sale market at Hilltops condo at Cairnhill Circle for a total of $48.2 million or an average price of about $2,560 per square foot (psf).



BT could not ascertain the loss suffered by the seller, who is believed to be a Hong Kong investor that bought the units in late 2007.



But according to back-of-the-envelope calculations by some analysts, the loss is estimated at 30-35 per cent.



The freehold project reportedly achieved an average price of just over $3,900 psf for the first 28 units, according to a news report in late 2007.



Government statistics show the project’s developer, SC Global subsidiary Taraville, sold 24 units in October 2007 at a median price of $3,711 psf.



According to the latest Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) statistics at the end of last month, 31 units in the project had been sold by the developer.



This is the same number of units that SC Global had released in the 241-unit condo by the same date. The project, comprising two 20-storey towers and a 14-storey block, is expected to be completed next year.



Savills is understood to have brokered the latest sub-sale deal involving the 18 units, which comprise mostly two and three-bedders.



The apartments were bought by companies whose shareholders include Mr Tan and Hasetrale Holdings, which is controlled by Mr Tan, his uncle Tan Chin Nam and a string of other Malaysians.



Hasetrale is also a shareholder in Napier Properties, developer of the 8 Napier condo on the former Eng Lok Mansion site.



Despite the loss suffered by the Hong Kong party in the sub-sale of 18 Hilltops apartments, market watchers described the $2,560 psf average price as attractive for the seller.



Keppel Land is understood to have sold a handful of units at The Promont nearby at prices ranging from just below $1,900 psf to $2,060 psf recently. The Promont is a 17-storey apartment development with just 15 apartments.



Earlier this month, BT reported that a property fund had bought the remaining 21 units at Sui Generis condo in Balmoral Crescent for $65 million or about $1,260 psf on average from the freehold project’s developers.



However, the price is understood to have been agreed much earlier in the year, when sentiment was still weak.



The latest URA statistics on developers’ home sales show an improvement in sales of high-end projects in July.



City Developments sold 79 units at Volari in Balmoral Road at a median price of $2,059 psf.



Four units each were sold at Nassim Park Residences ($3,273 psf median price) and The Orchard Residences ($2,815 psf median price).



Ho Bee found buyers for nine units at The Orange Grove at a median price of $2,334 psf.

No change to property sales tax framework

Source : Business Times – 22 Aug 2009


MOF drops proposed change aimed at giving certainty after public consultation exercise


THE government has decided not to change the current income tax framework with regard to individuals who sell their properties, a move that was welcomed by industry players including the Real Estate Developers’ Association of Singapore (Redas).



Under a proposal put up for public consultation, the Ministry of Finance (MOF) had suggested that individuals who sold their properties would be certain that the gains they made would not be subject to income tax if they had not sold any other properties in the preceding four years.



But this was seen by the market as an anti-speculation measure, as it means that those who sell more than one property within four years will not be exempt.



‘We remain believers of the idea that the government may be sending out a signal through this proposal to cool property transactions, especially in the high-end,’ said CIMB analyst Donald Chua in a note last month.



Keen to quell rumours about an anti-speculation drive, MOF then clarified that the proposal is unlikely to lead to more individuals being taxed. Rather, it offers greater clarity on whether gains will be taxed as it proposes a condition that would guarantee no tax: an individual who sells a property on or after Jan 1, 2010 will not be taxed on the gains if he has not sold any other property in the previous four years.



Currently, property sellers do not pay tax on gains unless the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) sees them as traders and treats the gains as income. IRAS makes its decision on a case-by-case basis, considering factors such as why the properties were sold, how long the sellers owned them and how frequently the sellers transacted properties in the past.



MOF decided not to implement the change following the recent public consultation exercise.



The proposal was put up for feedback under the Income Tax Act public consultation exercise from June 22 to July 14. A total of 64 comments were received on the proposed relaxation of income tax treatment for individuals who sell their properties, and of these, 60 comments were not in support of the proposed change.



Among other things, feedback said that the proposed change could bias property purchase decisions towards investing in one bigger property, rather than numerous smaller properties. This is because certainty of non-taxation would be provided for disposal of one property within any four years, regardless of the property’s value.



Concern was also raised that the proposed change could create inadvertent uncertainty for individuals who sell more than one property within any four years – even though there was no change to the current income tax treatment for such cases.



‘The Ministry of Finance sees merits in these points raised in the public feedback to the proposed change,’ MOF said in a statement. It has therefore decided that it is, on balance, best to retain the current framework of income tax treatment for individuals who sell their properties.



Industry players welcomed MOF’s decision.



‘We welcome the Ministry of Finance’s decision not to change the current income tax framework for individuals who sell their properties,’ said a Redas spokeswoman. ‘Redas appreciates the government’s consultative approach and understanding of the industry’s concern on the matter.’



‘We welcome the positive news that the Ministry of Finance has listened to public feedback,’ said Owi Kek Hean, head of tax services at KPMG in Singapore. ‘The decision not to change the current income tax framework for individuals who sell their properties clearly demonstrates how the government takes differing views on-board in its formulation and changes proposed to Singapore tax policy.’



MOF also said that it has accepted for implementation 85 out of the 113 suggestions received on the draft Income Tax (Amendment) Bill 2009. The draft contains proposed legislation to put into effect the income tax changes announced in Budget 2009, as well as other changes arising from the periodic review of the income tax system.

Ex-Parkway boss in $48m Hilltops deal

Source : Business Times – 22 Aug 2009

A GROUP led by former Parkway Holdings boss Tony Tan is understood to have picked up 18 apartments in the sub-sale market at Hilltops condo at Cairnhill Circle for a total of $48.2 million or an average price of about $2,560 per square foot (psf).

BT could not ascertain the loss suffered by the seller, who is believed to be a Hong Kong investor that bought the units in late 2007.

But according to back-of-the-envelope calculations by some analysts, the loss is estimated at 30-35 per cent.

The freehold project reportedly achieved an average price of just over $3,900 psf for the first 28 units, according to a news report in late 2007.

Government statistics show the project’s developer, SC Global subsidiary Taraville, sold 24 units in October 2007 at a median price of $3,711 psf.

According to the latest Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) statistics at the end of last month, 31 units in the project had been sold by the developer.

This is the same number of units that SC Global had released in the 241-unit condo by the same date. The project, comprising two 20-storey towers and a 14-storey block, is expected to be completed next year.

Savills is understood to have brokered the latest sub-sale deal involving the 18 units, which comprise mostly two and three-bedders.

The apartments were bought by companies whose shareholders include Mr Tan and Hasetrale Holdings, which is controlled by Mr Tan, his uncle Tan Chin Nam and a string of other Malaysians.

Hasetrale is also a shareholder in Napier Properties, developer of the 8 Napier condo on the former Eng Lok Mansion site.

Despite the loss suffered by the Hong Kong party in the sub-sale of 18 Hilltops apartments, market watchers described the $2,560 psf average price as attractive for the seller.

Keppel Land is understood to have sold a handful of units at The Promont nearby at prices ranging from just below $1,900 psf to $2,060 psf recently. The Promont is a 17-storey apartment development with just 15 apartments.

Earlier this month, BT reported that a property fund had bought the remaining 21 units at Sui Generis condo in Balmoral Crescent for $65 million or about $1,260 psf on average from the freehold project’s developers.

However, the price is understood to have been agreed much earlier in the year, when sentiment was still weak.

The latest URA statistics on developers’ home sales show an improvement in sales of high-end projects in July.

City Developments sold 79 units at Volari in Balmoral Road at a median price of $2,059 psf.

Four units each were sold at Nassim Park Residences ($3,273 psf median price) and The Orchard Residences ($2,815 psf median price).

Ho Bee found buyers for nine units at The Orange Grove at a median price of $2,334 psf.


Boom or bubble?

Property prices appear to be on the rise again, but is the rebound sustainable?

ON A Monday night in the last week of July, commuters taking the train home to the eastern part of Singapore may have witnessed a small commotion at the Tanah Merah MRT station.

It was about 10pm, and a group of about 40 people who had formed a queue beside the station since late afternoon was being told to go home.

Apparently, they were queuing to be first in line when a new condominium – Optima@Tanah Merah – opened its doors for bookings. Except that it was not being launched the morning after, but on Friday morning. They were prepared to stand in line for three whole days to get first dibs.

Representatives from the developer TID, a tie-up between Hong Leong Group and Japan’s Mitsui Fudosan, implored the crowd to go home.

‘The queue will not be recognised. We will not sell anything until Friday morning,’ they said.

The crowd dispersed. But their desperation quickly became the talk of the town, and the clearest symbol yet of how unexpectedly hot the local property market has become.

Elsewhere around the world, many property markets are locked into a downward spiral. But the story is startlingly different in Singapore.

Last month, developers like TID sold a whopping 2,767 units of new private homes, smashing the record of 1,825 units set only in June.

These are numbers that have never been seen in Singapore – not even during the stratospheric heights of the 2007 property boom. In just two months this year, developers have sold 328 more homes than in the whole of last year.

In the midst of this buying frenzy, developers have begun raising their prices. Some have even dared to launch new units at record-high per sq ft (psf) prices.

Indeed, the classic signs of a boom are in place: weekend crowds at showflats, blank cheques handed to agents to secure prime units, and flyers flooding the mailbox of every home.

But this boom is different from the last one because of one very important reason: The 2006-07 boom coincided with a period of rapid economic expansion. Today, house prices are rising in the wake of Singapore’s deepest-ever recession, and at a time when the entire global economy is only just starting to recover from the shock of a financial crisis.

This has sparked a debate over whether the property boom is hopelessly out of sync with economic fundamentals.

The Government seems worried, and National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan has already suggested that an element of speculation may be involved in the current boom.

Politically, market watchers say the stakes are higher this time around for the Government, because it is the more accessible suburban projects rather than the posh condominiums that are breaking the records.

With the prospect of ordinary folk potentially getting burnt in a price crash, the million-dollar question is whether the current rebound in the market is a genuine recovery.

Or is it just another unsustainable bubble pumped up by hype?

The answer varies, depending on whom you talk to, of course.

Veteran property developer Kwek Leng Beng, chairman of real estate giant City Developments, thinks the market is not getting too frothy.

‘It should not be viewed as over-exuberant or extraordinary, bearing in mind that developers had put on hold many of their launches in 2008,’ he said at a recent press conference.

In other words, people could have wanted to buy new homes last year, but there was no supply in view of 2008’s lacklustre conditions.

Now that there are more launches in 2009, this pent-up demand for homes is being satisfied all at once, accounting partly for the record sales volume in recent months.

Prices are not unreasonably high, Mr Kwek added, noting that the low- and mid-tier markets have yet to recover since their peaks in 1996.

CBRE Research data shows that me-dian prices of new non-landed homes reached $690 psf in the second quarter, compared with $749 psf at the 1996 peak, though the level surged to $800 psf last month.

Analysts also say that the demand is real, driven by buyers awash with liquidity.

People still have money saved from the bonuses of the boom years, and some may have profited from the stock market rally in April and May.

But investment options are few and far between, with savings interest rates near zero and the stock market now losing some steam.

‘After the Lehman Brothers structured products failure, property is also increasingly viewed as a safe investment alternative as its value will not drop to zero,’ says Ms Chua Chor Hoon, head of South-east Asia research at property consultancy DTZ.

At the same time, labour market resilience is helping. The job market gloom and doom prevalent at the start of the year has been replaced by guarded optimism as government stimulus spending has halted a large upswing in the number of jobless people.

‘No matter how much cash you have, if you think you’re going to lose your job in the next six months, you’re not going to invest in property,’ says Citigroup economist Kit Wei Zheng.

But with the economy looking up and the spectre of job losses fading, many feel there is no better time than now or place to park their money than in bricks and mortar.

After all, some see a bet on the property market as a bet on the long-term growth of Singapore as a global city.

Mr Leong Sze Hian, president of the Society of Financial Service Professionals, points out that 79,000 permanent residents and 21,000 citizens were added to the population last year.

And more will be added in the future as Singapore heads towards its target population of 6.5 million.

The buzz generated by the completion of the integrated resorts could hasten foreigner arrivals, say optimists.

Finally, some analysts note that this buying power in the market is being supported by younger home buyers who are coming up against a tight supply of Housing Board flats. This has the effect of hiking HDB prices and narrowing the price gap between public and private homes.

With home loan rates also near historic lows, cheap funding is another key factor driving the demand – combining with the other factors to make private property a very attractive and affordable proposition.

It is primarily because of these factors that most experts agree there is some real demand that justifies the higher prices and sales volumes in the market.

They say the current market should be seen against the backdrop of a market that was stuck in the doldrums only four or five months ago.

With buyers reluctant to commit, some developers had to slash prices by as much as 30 to 35 per cent early this year to generate interest in their projects.

Still, despite the resale and sub-sale markets moving ahead, experts say there remain a lot more over-optimistic sellers than there are buyers.

A collective sale frenzy, like the one that gripped the property market in 2006 and 2007, is also nowhere in sight.

‘What we are seeing is recovery phase activity,’ says Associate Professor Sing Tien Foo from the National University of Singapore’s real estate department. ‘It takes a while for a bubble to build up.’

DTZ’s Ms Chua notes: ‘A bubble means that prices are rising way too fast relative to GDP (gross domestic product) growth. So far, we have seen only one quarter of rising prices in the property market.’

But while many experts don’t see a bubble yet, it doesn’t mean that one won’t form, and what happens next will be very important.

Property consultant Nicholas Mak expects home prices to reach a plateau, with the lows seen earlier this year unlikely to be repeated.

‘Right now, prices may continue to run for a few months before stabilising. Ultimately, the market has to return to market fundamentals,’ he says.

The problem is that prices may not take that rational trajectory if buyers get carried away. Property consultants and developers have warned that demand is coming from those who missed out on the 2007 high-end boom.

Eyebrows have already been raised at the sort of prices buyers have been willing to pay for suburban properties.

Units at Centro Residences, which is next to Ang Mo Kio MRT station, sold for between $1,117 psf and $1,228 psf last month, a record for suburban homes in Singapore.

‘When there is fear or belief that prices are going to keep rising, and many speculators jump in in the hope of making capital gains over the next few years, prices could be driven up beyond fundamental levels like in 1996 and 2000,’ says Ms Chua.

‘The future’s a sure bet but what’s happening right now is beyond our wildest dreams. No one would have predicted the July sales figure,’ says Cushman & Wakefield managing director Donald Han.

‘We’ve seen price increases of 15 per cent on average since April. It seems too short, too fast a time… At some stage, prices should stabilise.’

One property expert, who declines to be named, thinks that for this to happen, buyers must do a serious reality check: ‘Every round of recovery, we see people getting carried away by the herd instinct. There’s a total disconnect with reality. It’s momentary madness.’

That is why economists and analysts recommend that home buyers sober up by reminding themselves of some hard economic truths before signing on the dotted line.

One such truth is that how the economy fares over the coming months will be a key indicator of the future of property prices. And on that, the jury is still out.

Although the economy surged 20.7 per cent between April and June compared to the first quarter, Trade and Industry Minister Lim Hng Kiang says it is too early to cheer.

Key markets like the United States and Europe have pulled out of recession but growth is likely to be anaemic for the next few years.

CIMB-GK economist Song Seng Wun says: ‘The global slowdown does seem to have stabilised, but a recovery could still be far away.

‘And while Asian growth may be holding steady, it may not be as strong as we are used to, as developed economies are not seeing the strong recovery.’

HSR Property Group executive director Eric Cheng points to another cold, hard truth: ample property supply.

There are still 62,350 uncompleted homes in the pipeline, according to Urban Redevelopment Authority data. Slightly less than half have been sold.

In particular, major developers are still holding back their large luxury launches because the foreign funds and investors who bought into the posh homes in districts 9, 10 and 11 have not returned in significant numbers.

‘The key is whether the price growth at this recovery stage can be sustained. It remains unclear who will pick up the prime homes,’ says Prof Sing.

Many buyers also seem to have ignored the fact that residential rents are still falling.

‘But Singapore has never been a yield-driven market like mature markets like Australia and the UK,’ concedes Credo Real Estate managing director Karamjit Singh. ‘The two key drivers here are owner-occupier demand and sentiment.’

Looking ahead, property commentators forecast a variety of outcomes for the months to come – from another slump to continued buoyancy.

Credo’s Mr Singh is looking at the recovery lasting up to 12 months before prices start to moderate as more launch-ready projects come onstream.

More bearish analysts like RBS’ Fera Wirawan say a mass market bubble has already formed. In an Aug 13 report, she predicted that the bubble will burst, sending residential prices plummeting by 10 to 20 per cent over the next 12 months.

Then, there is the wild card factor of the Government.

‘If queues continue to form and people continue to flip, then we may see some (government) intervention,’ says Mr Song.

Property experts say this could mean the re-introduction of outright land sales to boost supply, or the abolishment of the interest absorption scheme that allows buyers to defer paying the bulk of the purchase price until the development is completed.

But they also believe the Government will exercise extreme caution. Mr Song believes policymakers won’t want to prick the bubble too early as that may deflate the economy.

But he adds: ‘But if you let it simmer and build up, it will also be troublesome when it bursts.’

One expert, who does not wish to be identified, warns that if a crash were to come, ‘it may take us all by surprise’, just as the recovery did.

The best thing to do, advises Mr Song, is to exercise the same type of ‘extreme caution’ over the coming 12 months.

He says: ‘My take is that this recovery’s not going to be simple. Global growth is not going to rebound to the previous pace. We can show a couple of quarters of sharp rebound, but it is likely to slow after that…

‘Any bubble could well deflate on its own.’

Source : Straits Times – 22 Aug 2009

More homes in the pipeline

More than 40,000 units are due to come onto the market over the next few years

PROPERTY supply is not a problem, according to National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan. He believes that there are plenty of homes in the supply pipeline for Singaporeans, pointing out at a recent event that more than 40,000 units are due to come onto the market over the next three or four years.
The latest market data certainly supports his view. Figures from Savills Research and Consultancy point to a healthy stream of launches.

It says 5,753 units will become available in the second half of this year and 5,576 units next year. In 2011, 13,418 will be launched; 13,751 in 2012; and 11,058 in 2013.

Of those becoming available between this year and 2012, the bulk – 52 per cent – will be in prime districts 9, 10, 11 and 15, which analysts suggest is a direct consequence of the en bloc buying sprees in these districts in 2005 and 2006.
The rest will largely come from city-fringe developments at Sentosa and the new Marina Bay.


2009

OF THE 5,753 units becoming available in the second half of the year, most are mid-tier and mass-market units. They number 2,292 and 2,083 respectively.

These include 556 units in Casa Merah at Tanah Merah, 610 units in The Centris at Boon Lay and 338 units in Carabelle on the west coast.

But more than 90 per cent – 5,284 units – have already been sold, so Savills anticipates no oversupply situation this year.


2010

ANALYSTS have mixed views about the supply situation next year. The 5,576 units available next year will be concentrated in prime areas, with 3,304 units up for grabs.

They include 428 units at Marina Bay Residences and 231 units at The Trillium along Kim Seng Road. Savills estimates about 75 per cent of the uncompleted units have been sold, leaving little room for oversupply.

Instead, the concern is insufficient supply given the drastic fall in supply numbers.
In the first quarter of last year, 17,545 units were projected for completion in 2010. The number tumbled to 8,538 in last year’s third quarter and continued downwards to 5,394 from the second quarter of this year, according to the Urban Redevelopment Authority.

But Ms Tay Huey Ying, director for research and advisory at Colliers International, feels the supply trend is in line with expected economic conditions, making a supply shortage an unlikely scenario.

‘While the worst may be over for Singapore’s economy, growth will remain slow for a few more quarters. Moreover, the major economies of the United States and European Union remain weak,’ she says.
‘Hence, Singapore’s expatriate population is largely expected to see only moderate growth in 2010.’

DTZ senior director and head of Southeast Asia research, Ms Chua Chor Hoon, adds that with the economy apparently on the mend, rent declines will begin to moderate and could bottom out in the first half of next year.


2011

2011 will bring an explosion in supply, particularly in the prime districts. Some 13,418 units are slated to be completed during the year, Savills figures indicate. About half, or 6,512 units, will be situated in the prime districts and 4,224 in the mid-tier districts.

Among the developments in the prime districts, Martin Place Residences in River Valley, for example, will offer 302 units. Scotts Square in Orchard will have 338 units and One Shenton in the Central Business District another 341 units.
About half of the 13,418 units have been sold, while the remainder are unsold or have yet to be launched.
The demand for uncompleted units between 2000 and 2008 has hovered at an average of 7,230 units per year.

With a high of almost twice this number becoming available in 2011, market watchers fear oversupply.
But some factors may help mitigate this.

Developers are likely to pace construction and launches in line with market needs; the Government’s move to suspend the sale of confirmed sites helps sustain demand; and, if the economy returns to growth in 2011, accompanying growth in the expatriate population will support demand for new homes.
One upside to any glut – if you are a tenant – is that new supply will keep rental increases down, says DTZ’s Ms Chua.


2012

THE 13,751 units to be completed in 2012 will further boost supply.
Some 6,414 units will be located in the prime districts and 4,774 from the mid-tier market. The rest will be for the mass market.

Mid-tier offerings include Soleil at Sinaran in Novena with 417 units, Rosewood Suites in Woodlands with 200 units, and The Arte@Thomson with 336 units.

Of these, 30 per cent of units planned and under construction have been sold.
These numbers are, however, subject to change with developers adjusting project timings to market conditions, says Ms Chua.

And Collier’s Ms Tay thinks a return of collective sale market fever could be a factor that moderates the net new supply coming on stream in 2011 and 2012.


2013

HOW the supply situation in 2013 will pan out is too far ahead to determine right now.

Source : Straits Times – 22 Aug 2009

Friday, August 21, 2009

Hong Kong’s 50-yr rule has marred skyline


Source : Straits Times – 21 Aug 2009

COLLECTIVE property sales opponents like Mr Dennis Butler (’En bloc sales: Adopt HK’s 50-year limit’, last Saturday) and Mr Augustine Cheah (’The difference’, last Saturday) have quickly latched on to Ms Tan Hui Yee’s piece, ‘En bloc debate, HK style’ (Aug 10) and hailed it as a ‘well-argued commentary’.

Few people in Singapore know that all Hong Kong properties are on a 50-year leasehold term, beginning from the handover date July 1, 1998, except the land on which St John’s Cathedral stands in Central, which is the only freehold land in Hong Kong.

That may be one reason why the Hong Kong administration proposed a condition to lower the 90 per cent consent threshold to 80 per cent – that the building be at least 50 years old. For example, if a 30-year-old building was demolished after a collective sale, the remaining lease on the land would be below 20 years.

From Hong Kong’s international airport, you take a ride through the scenic beauty of the New Territories. Then you pass through downtown Kowloon and Hong Kong Island on the way to Central, and your opinion changes as you see many dirty and derelict buildings along the way. Many note that Hong Kong is a city of great contrast: modern skyscrapers exist side by side with rundown buildings.

With Mr Butler’s suggestion of a 50-year age limit before a collective sale can take place, the Hong Kong scenario could well be part of our skyline in time to come.

Still, I believe buildings under 20 years old, in particular those under 10 years old, should be barred from collective sales unless there are structural problems.

Mr Butler and Mr Cheah latch on to a comment from a Hong Kong letter writer: ‘Making a profit for developers is not a public purpose.’ I do not dispute the sentiment but I am surprised they left out those who also make money: home owners who sell out, voluntarily or not.

There have been more than 100 collective sales in Singapore over the years, with 80 to 90 per cent consenters and 10 to 20 per cent objectors in each sale. Thus the proportion of proponents to opponents is four to one or higher. I hope the authorities will take note of this point if they see fit to fiddle with the collective sales rules yet again.

Ace Matthews


Rights of all owners adequately protected


Source : Straits Times – 21 Aug 2009

I REFER to last Saturday’s letters by Mr Dennis Butler (’En bloc sales: Adopt HK’s 50-year limit’) and Mr Augustine Cheah (’The difference’).

In 1999, the Land Titles (Strata) Act was amended to allow collective property sales by majority consent. One of the key considerations in this amendment was to facilitate urban renewal and avoid situations where a small minority of owners can hold up the sale of the development where the use of the land could be optimised.

We have taken steps under the Act to ensure the rights of all owners are adequately protected and provide recourse for those who feel aggrieved for any reason. For example, all collective sales applications have to be considered by the Strata Titles Board. Minority owners who object to the sale can raise their objections to the board, and the board is required to consider these objections before it decides on the outcome of the sales application.

In 2004 and 2007, we refined and updated the Act to provide more safeguards to owners in a collective sale process. For example, owners will have a mandatory five-day cooling-off period after signing a collective sales agreement to reconsider their consent.

Mr Butler has suggested that only developments that are more than 50 years old should be considered for collective sale redevelopment. It would be too rigid to set such an age limit. There could be other factors that warrant redevelopment like its state of disrepair. It is better to leave it to the owners in each development to determine the viability and timing of collective sales.

The current policy has resulted in a better use of our limited land to create more quality housing units for Singaporeans.

For example, the 390-unit Goldenhill Park Condominium sits on the site formerly occupied by the 95-unit Goldenhill Condominium; and the 100-unit The Ansley used to be occupied by the 44-unit Mandalay Court. These former developments were less than 50 years old at the time of the collective sale and redevelopment – Goldenhill Condominium was 15 years old and Mandalay Court was 31 years old. Collective sales also offer a viable alternative for owners to seek new accommodation with new and better facilities.

We thank Mr Butler and Mr Cheah for their feedback. The Ministry of Law will continue to monitor the impact of collective sales rules, and would review the law as and when appropriate.

Chong Wan Yieng (Ms)
Head (Corporate Communications)
Ministry of Law


Concourse Skyline: New condo to get walkway to MRT station

Source : Straits Times – 21 Aug 2009

HOW’S this for a condominium’s selling point: Near MRT station. Complete with all-weather walkway.

The new Concourse Skyline in Beach Road could be the first private housing project to have an overhead bridge linking it to Singapore’s mass transit system.

Other condo projects are likely to follow, in what could be an emerging trend.

Once it is completed, residents of the 99-year lease Concourse Skyline, being built on a demolished wing of the Concourse complex, will need to walk only about 200m to the Circle Line’s rebuilt (and relocated) Nicoll Highway station due to open next year.

The 360-unit condo, developed by listed property group Hong Fok at an estimated $200 million, is expected to be ready by 2013.

Concourse Skyline’s unique addition arose from rather unusual circumstances. The original Nicoll Highway station, which was much nearer to the Concourse, would have had an underground link to the former Concourse wing. But when the uncompleted station collapsed, killing four workers in a 2004 construction accident, plans for the underground link were scrapped.

A dispute then ensued between the Land Transport Authority and Hong Fok. Neither party would comment on this, but The Straits Times understands it partly involved the condo developer wanting direct access to the new station. The issue was settled last year, resulting in the overhead residential link.


Why not an underground connection?

‘The new Concourse development is no longer a commercial space, and the new MRT station is much farther away,’ explained Hong Fok director S.E. Cheong.

The project will be carried out in three stages, the first being the overhead bridge spanning Nicoll Highway. It was completed recently.

Construction of the second stage that links the overhead bridge to the MRT station, complete with lifts and escalators, is under way.

Once the Concourse Skyway nears completion, the final segment joining the condo to the bridge will be built by Hong Fok. Access to this segment will be through a secured doorway, passable only to residents.

Hong Fok had already included the linkway in publicity materials for the condo. The project was launched last year just as the impact of the world financial crisis hit Singapore. Units were then priced at between $1,500 and $1,800 per sq ft. Mr Cheong said yesterday 140 units have been sold.

City Developments’ massive $2.5 billion South Beach project – also in Beach Road and targeted to be up by 2016 – will also have mass transit links. A spokesman said the 3.5ha commercial-and-residential project will have underground links to both Circle Line and Downtown Line stations, as well as to CityLink Mall that connects to the City Hall station and Raffles City Shopping Centre.