Saturday, July 31, 2010

URA launches Tg Pagar white site for sale

Source : Today – 31 Jul 2010

The Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) has launched a white site at Peck Seah Street and Choon Guan Street for sale by public tender.

The 1.5 hectare land parcel is being put up for sale under the Confirmed List in the second half of the Government Land Sales Programme.

The 99-year leasehold site is zoned for commercial, hotel and residential use, and is strategically located next to the Tanjong Pagar MRT Station.

The URA said at least 60 per cent of the maximum permissible gross floor area (GFA) has to be set aside for office use.

At least 10 per cent of the maximum permissible GFA is for hotel rooms and hotel-related uses. The remaining GFA can be used for any combination of commercial, hotel and residential purposes.

The maximum height of the new development is 280 metres above mean sea level and this means it will have panoramic views of the city skyline across the Central Business District to the Marina Bay area and the Chinatown Historical District.

CBRE Research executive director Li Hiaw Ho said that the site could “yield approximately 846,000 square foot of office space”.

“The predominantly office development is set to tower over the other developments in the vicinity. This would change the urban landscape of the Tanjong Pagar micro-market and hasten the pace of rejuvenation in this area,” added Mr Li.

He also said that “the successful tenderer for this site would be tempted to utilise the remaining 30 per cent of maximum GFA for residential use. The concept of inner-city living has been growing in popularity in the last five years”.

Meanwhile, head of research and consultancy at Chesterton Suntec International, Mr Colin Tan, said: “The only problem is building over an existing MRT track. Developer needs to be very careful and speed of construction may be slower. Development costs maybe higher as well.”

The tender will close at noon on Nov 16. Selection of the successful tenderer will be based on the tendered land price only.


They paid $130,000 COV for Yishun flat 14 years ago


Source : AsiaOne – 31 Jul 2010

With the current property market and HDB prices at its peak, potential second-hand flat buyers should not dive in recklessly when purchasing a flat, but will have to be mindful of the potential pitfalls, warns real estate agents.

Citing an example of a family who paid S$645,000 for their executive maisonette in Yishun 14 years ago, Mr Mohamed Ismail, CEO of PropNex real estate agency, says the family has yet to make a profit on their purchase.

That is because they paid a cash-over-valuation (COV) amount of $130,000 then, during the property boom in 1996.

While prices of HDB flats are currently at its highest historically, the median price of a similar unit in Yishun now is still only $460,000.

Cash-over-Valuation is the difference between the bank’s valuation and the actual price paid.

According to the latest data released by the Housing Development Board (HDB), resale prices for HDB flats rose for the eighth straight quarter between April and last month.

The median cash over valuation (COV) hit a record $30,000, which is a 20 per cent jump over the $25,000 median COV amount in the first quarter of this year.

Almost all, or 96 per cent, of resale cases transacted above valuation.

Singaporeans seem undeterred by the jump in prices, as resale transactions rose by about 7 per cent this quarter, from 8,484 cases.

The example of the family in Yishun serves as a warning to others hoping to purchase a HDB flat now, when prices of flats and COV prices are at their peak, says Mr Iswan.

“It is a vicious cycle,” says Mr Iswan.

With the property market at its peak, sellers making a tidy profit from selling their unit would be willing to purchase a flat, despite a high COV.

Conversely, the seller would want to sell their unit at the highest price possible, to ensure that they will be able to afford another housing option.

Highest COVs for flats in Quenstown, Bukit Merah and Bishan

Flats in central Singapore are still fetching the highest prices, according to the latest statistics released by the Housing Development Board (HDB).

The resale price index for flats in the second quarter of this reached 161.3 points, with a percentage increase of 4.1 per cent from the previous quarter.

Units in Queenstown, Bukit Merah and Bishan fetched the highest amounts, with four-room flats in Queenstown and Bukit Merah transacting at a median price of $550,000 and $500,000 respectively.

The median price transacted for a similar unit in Bishan was $452,500.

As for executive units, a Queenstown unit fetched the highest amount, with a median price of $781,500, and Bishan was second at $685,500.

Mr Chris Koh, Corporate Director and Senior President of local realtor Dennis Wee Group advises potential buyers when choosing a flat, to focus on important factors such as the location, as well as the amenities that can be found in the neighbourhood.

“After all,” he says, “these are what will affect the price of your flat.”


Friday, July 30, 2010

More making the move to suburbia

Source : Today – 30 Jul 2010

Property investors with a lower budget but with a longer term perspective towards property purchases may look at the choices available in suburban areas instead of prime locations.

Analysts reckon that prices in upcoming suburban areas are still within reach and units there have upside potential as well, making them good investment opportunities.

Among the new coming areas that potential buyers can consider include Serangoon, Jurong Lake District and Punggol Waterfront Town, market experts said.

Mr Colin Tan, Chesterton Suntec International research and consultancy director, said: “Investors should identify areas with future potential and enter early to secure a pricing more reasonable than some of the developed areas. In the long term, say about five years, the price may rise 20 to 30 per cent.”

Mr Tan noted that since the opening of the Integrated Resorts, property prices in suburban areas have also increased sharply from between $400 and $450 per square foot to about $800 psf.

Experts said some developments within the suburban areas have become popular mainly because of their proximity to the new and less heavily-used Circle Line.

In addition, they observed that more expatriates are settling away from the prime areas as well, creating more rental opportunities for unit owners. “Expatriates are increasingly moving into suburban areas to save on the housing allowances. Meanwhile, a greater proportion of foreign and permanent resident Chinese and Indian buyers are also doing so because of their preference,” said Ms Chua Chor Hoon, senior director of research at property consultancy DTZ.

Among the new upcoming areas that are expected to see a vibrant community when fully developed are Kallang Riverside and Jurong Lakeside District.

When completed, Kallang Riverside will see a new Sports Hub, an additional 400,000 square metres of commercial space, 3,000 hotel rooms and more.

Meanwhile, the Jurong Lakeside district will be developed into a major regional centre, featuring a commercial hub and leisure destinations for locals and tourists.

“The overall development in these areas can give an uplift to prices in the region, ” Ms Chua added.

But industry experts noted that to keep the selling price palatable, developers may build smaller units.

In addition, Mr Tan cautioned: “Because these new sites need at least three to four years to develop fully, investors should be careful about timing the market and be prepared to hold the units.”

Meanwhile, for those with deeper pockets, industry watchers still recommend the prime area properties.

“For investment, it is good to buy into prime areas with good resale and rental value. In these areas, prices have not climbed to its peak and there is more upside, therefore, there is less price resistance,” said Ms Chua.


Three HUDC estates in Hougang, Potong Pasir designated for privatisation

Source : Channel NewsAsia – 30 Jul 2010

The government has identified three HUDC estates for privatisation.

The estates are located at Hougang North Neighbourhood 3, Hougang North Neighbourhood 7, and Potong Pasir.

The Ministry of National Development (MND) said the three estates comprise a total of 797 of apartments and maisonettes.

Real estate agents said the news could affect prices of these properties, which may rise 5 to 7 per cent.

“With privatisation, everyone will be happy (because) the price will be higher if we intend to sell,’ said Steven Tan. The HUDC estate at Hougang Avenue 7 which he’s been living in has been put up for privatisation.

Property agents said prices could inch up overnight.

Recently transacted prices in the three estates range from S$620,000 to S$735,000.

“I won’t be surprise some will say if I were to sell you the unit, then I am giving up my opportunity to cash in more if this development go en bloc. We’ve heard of developments where once it is privatised, the prices there sometimes rocket by S$100,000,” said Chris Koh, director of Dennis Wee Group.

Industry players said the en bloc potential for these HUDC estates is good because they are located in mature estates with more developed infrastructure and amenities.

The privatisation process could take up to two-and-a-half years.

But it will need support from three quarters of the residents.

Helen Lee, Protem Committee Member of Hougang Avenue 7 HUDC estate said: “The last time we did a survey in early 2009, more than 80 per cent of the residents were actually in favour of the privatisation. I think it shouldn’t be a problem getting the 75 per cent vote.”

The residents of each estate will have to form a protem committee comprising resident representatives to act on their behalf.

One stumbling block could be the privatisation cost, which include legal and survey cost, as well as cost of land transfer.

The Ministry of National Development (MND) will cap the cost of privatisation at $30,000 per flat for the three newly-designated estates at Hougang and Potong Pasir.

The MND said this is a concession to enable HUDC lessees to fulfil their aspirations to enhance their assets.

The concession will also apply to the Serangoon North HUDC estate, which is in the process of obtaining support for privatisation.

The capping of privatisation cost at $30,000 is only valid for three years, starting from 2 August 2010.

Thereafter, MND said the cost of privatisation will be adjusted to take into consideration the prevailing redevelopment potential of the land.

Observers said privatisation means flat owners will no longer be bound by some public housing rules like sub-letting, and they can sell or rent their homes to anyone.


Three HUDC estates in Hougang, Potong Pasir designated for privatisation

Source : Channel NewsAsia – 30 Jul 2010

The government has identified three HUDC estates for privatisation.

The estates are located at Hougang North Neighbourhood 3, Hougang North Neighbourhood 7, and Potong Pasir.

The Ministry of National Development (MND) said the three estates comprise a total of 797 of apartments and maisonettes.

Real estate agents said the news could affect prices of these properties, which may rise 5 to 7 per cent.

“With privatisation, everyone will be happy (because) the price will be higher if we intend to sell,’ said Steven Tan. The HUDC estate at Hougang Avenue 7 which he’s been living in has been put up for privatisation.

Property agents said prices could inch up overnight.

Recently transacted prices in the three estates range from S$620,000 to S$735,000.

“I won’t be surprise some will say if I were to sell you the unit, then I am giving up my opportunity to cash in more if this development go en bloc. We’ve heard of developments where once it is privatised, the prices there sometimes rocket by S$100,000,” said Chris Koh, director of Dennis Wee Group.

Industry players said the en bloc potential for these HUDC estates is good because they are located in mature estates with more developed infrastructure and amenities.

The privatisation process could take up to two-and-a-half years.

But it will need support from three quarters of the residents.

Helen Lee, Protem Committee Member of Hougang Avenue 7 HUDC estate said: “The last time we did a survey in early 2009, more than 80 per cent of the residents were actually in favour of the privatisation. I think it shouldn’t be a problem getting the 75 per cent vote.”

The residents of each estate will have to form a protem committee comprising resident representatives to act on their behalf.

One stumbling block could be the privatisation cost, which include legal and survey cost, as well as cost of land transfer.

The Ministry of National Development (MND) will cap the cost of privatisation at $30,000 per flat for the three newly-designated estates at Hougang and Potong Pasir.

The MND said this is a concession to enable HUDC lessees to fulfil their aspirations to enhance their assets.

The concession will also apply to the Serangoon North HUDC estate, which is in the process of obtaining support for privatisation.

The capping of privatisation cost at $30,000 is only valid for three years, starting from 2 August 2010.

Thereafter, MND said the cost of privatisation will be adjusted to take into consideration the prevailing redevelopment potential of the land.

Observers said privatisation means flat owners will no longer be bound by some public housing rules like sub-letting, and they can sell or rent their homes to anyone.


Time to relook plot ratios

Source : Today – 30 Jul 2010

In a place as small as Singapore, with one of the highest population densities in the world, space must be and is at a premium.

However, some of our building policies appear to be wasteful of that precious resource, land.

Residential plot ratios here must be among the least generous among the major cities of the world. In most parts of the island, plot ratios are between 1.4 and 2.8 times the area of the site, meaning you can have a gross floor area of between 1.4 and 2.8 times the size of the land area. So, if you have a 1,000 sq ft plot of land, you can have a built-up floor area of between 1,400 sq ft and 2,800 sq ft.

The higher the plot ratio, the more gross floor area the developer is able to build up to, thereby maximising his profits.

Plot ratios are used to control the height/form of a particular development.

In general, each plot of land is assigned a particular plot ratio. Developers and architects are not to exceed this plot ratio in their design or a development charge may be imposed.

According to Urban Redevelopment Authority guidelines, a site with a 1.4 plot ratio may be allowed to be developed up to a maximum of five storeys. One with 1.6 plot ratio up to 12 storeys, 2.1 up to 24 storeys and those with a plot ratio of 2.8 up to 36 storeys.

However, Hong Kong, which has a slightly higher population density, has plot ratios of between eight and 10 on Hong Kong Island, 7.5 on Kowloon and New Kowloon, eight in Tsuen Wan, Kwai Chung and Tsing Yi and between three and 6.5 in the rest of the Special Administrative Region.

There are, of course, exceptions in places designated for low-rise buildings like the Peak. In other words, developers in Hong Kong enjoy gross floor areas of more than three times the allowable space here.

I am not advocating densities anywhere near those of Hong Kong’s – that kind of crowding could drive most of us here mad. But surely the authorities here can be more generous?

As everyone knows, people like to live in or around certain popular districts, especially in areas near the Central Business District and near MRT stations. So, why not have higher plot ratios in these popular areas?

To me, it does not make sense for a site in Geylang to have the same plot ratio as one in Cairnhill, Newton or the Orchard areas. Surely with more people wanting to live in the latter areas, the authorities could provide for higher plot ratios in these areas.

Quite often, decisions on plot ratios here appear to be quite arbitrary. They are supposed to be made on the basis of what the infrastructure in the area can support. But, alas, in reality that does not seem to be the case.

Take, for example, the area bounded by Cairnhill Road, Peck Hay Road, Clemenceau Avenue and Scotts Road, a private residential plot there has a ratio of 2.8 while adjacent state lands have plot ratios of 4.2.

Across the road, near Newton Circus, the plot of land next to the Sheraton Hotel and on which a new condominium complex developed by CapitaLand Holdings has risen also enjoys a plot ratio of 4.2, whereas all other developments in that area carry a plot ratio of 2.8.

Don’t they all depend on the same infrastructure of roads and other amenities?

And why restrict the height at these places to 36 storeys, especially when more and more people these days are losing their fear of heights and actually enjoy high-rise living? Why also prevent more people from enjoying the view?

For sure, some hurdles are coming down. For instance, the Icon at Tanjong Pagar – a mixed development – has a plot ratio of 8.4, with the residential apartments going up to 46 storeys. Apartments at The Sail at Marina Bay rise up to 70 storeys at one tower and 63 storeys in the other tower. But these appear ad hoc.

I know that one of the reasons for the current low plot ratios is to allow for future redevelopment of these sites but why can’t residents enjoy the benefits now, especially in the better and more sought after locations?

The Government can also benefit from higher development charges in these areas.

So, let us not waste one of our precious assets with plot ratio restrictions.


Index, index on the wall, will you reflect the ground?

Business Times – 30 Jul 2010

THE Real Estate Developers’ Association of Singapore has made a bold move by launching its Real Estate Sentiment Index (RESI).

The industry has taken a risk going public with the sentiment index, which it developed jointly with the National University of Singapore’s Department of Real Estate.

As expected, brickbats have surfaced, with sceptics questioning the credibility of developers – the key respondents in the survey for the index – as they have a natural vested bias towards generating positive sentiment, which is good for their business of selling homes.

Looking at the evidence so far, RESI for Q1 and Q2 this year, respondents seem to have been fairly honest on the whole.

The index is based on a quarterly structured questionnaire survey conducted among senior execs of Redas member-firms – mostly developers. About 70 respondents – largely the same – took part in the Q1 and Q2 surveys.

RESI comprises three indices – a current index, which measures perceptions over the past six months; a future index tracking expectations for the next six months; and a composite index, the average of the two other indices. The indices range from 0 to 10, with a score of above 5 showing improving market conditions and of below 5 indicating deteriorating conditions.

The composite index fell from 6.8 in Q1 to 5.9 in Q2, which seems to tally with ground experience. Sentiment in the local property market was hit in the second quarter by Europe’s sovereign debt crisis.

However, the true test for RESI and Redas will come with time. Some sceptics are wondering if the index will ever fall significantly below 5 when things become really bad again.

Will developers responding to the survey be honest and indicate how dire the situation on the ground is, knowing they risk causing a further downward spiral in sentiment if they do so? Some respondents may come to a consensus about how they’ll vote, as they may feel pressured to try and preserve sentiment. So the index could be subject to manipulation, goes the argument.

There may also be a reverse situation where instead of wanting to paint a rosy picture, some respondents may wish to paint a bleak one when that suits them – for example, when developers try to lobby government to moderate its land sales programme.

Frankly, anything’s possible. Of course, developers know they will be laughed at if the final index paints a rosy picture when everyone knows things are pretty grim. The pressure of preserving their own credibility will serve as a check on developers’ responses veering too far from their true views.

A set of 70 respondents seems small but is actually a decent size for the Singapore property industry. Each respondent represents one company. About 60 per cent of the respondents are from property developers; the rest include property consultants, engineers, quantity surveyors and other professionals.

What’s to be welcomed about RESI is that it is forward looking since respondents are polled for future sentiment – complementing the vast body of ‘backward-looking’ real estate data available from Urban Redevelopment Authority, property consultants and other organisations such as the NUS’s Institute of Real Estate Studies, which produces the Singapore Residential Price Index.

RESI will provide another piece of information that stakeholders and players in the property market can take into account in making their decisions. No one’s expecting home buyers to read just the RESI and dash off to a developer’s showflat. Those who believe developers can’t be trusted to express honest views on the market can always choose to ignore RESI.

Time will tell if RESI will prove sustainable.

The stakes are high for Redas. The best incentive that developers have for ensuring RESI’s authenticity and reliability as a gauge of their sentiment is a need to preserve their own integrity and that of their industry body. By going public with the newly minted sentiment index, Redas president Simon Cheong and CEO Steven Choo have raised the ballgame for the 51-year old organisation to a whole new level.


Deciding between freehold and leasehold

Why are freehold properties preferred to leasehold properties? Given that the current median life span in Singapore stands at 81.4 years, a 99-year leasehold property, whose ownership reverts to the State after this period, offers a more than adequate home for any one generation.

But setting aside owner-occupation, if you expect your property to be an investment for wealth preservation or a legacy for future generations, then a freehold home, which allows you to hold the property in perpetuity, makes more economic sense.

This argument holds even for 999-year leasehold properties, which effectively function like freehold properties, although technically and legally they are in effect still leasehold properties.

Against this backdrop, the preference for freehold property over leasehold property is simple economics – if supply is limited and demand increases, prices go up. We studied resale prices of freehold versus leasehold properties and found that the difference was between 10 and 15 per cent.

There are many factors that can affect resale prices over time. Location, proximity and unit types are among the variables.

Admittedly, it is quite difficult to find freehold land and leasehold developments in close proximity. Nonetheless, there are still some locations that fit our selection criteria. Also, in arriving at our 10- to 15-per-cent figure, we categorised transactions by floor area, to eliminate discounts of larger units.

But this differential between freehold and leasehold properties is also affected by market conditions. During a downturn, both freehold and leasehold properties slide in tandem with the broader market.

At times, the price differences narrow. This then becomes a window of opportunity to buy that coveted freehold property.

Interestingly, when the broader market recovers, freehold properties, in particular those with significant en-bloc potential were observed to appreciate faster than leasehold properties. In some cases, the price premium reached more than 25 per cent.

But before you splurge on that dream freehold property, there are a few points to note. The first is that despite the property being freehold – age matters. Older developments command lower prices and also have a slower rate of capital appreciation. This is because of a variety of factors. Among them: The greater cost of maintenance and a general preference among Singaporeans for newer properties with fancy fixtures and fittings.

But when it comes to buying property, whether for consumption or investment, it is important to understand your budget, needs and holding horizon. For example, when the market sees a short-term spike, the tenure of the property does not really matter especially if you’re looking for a quick gain and price momentum is all that matters. In the longer run, however, freehold properties are less risky in terms of returns and volatility.

This is not to say that leasehold properties are always poor cousins to freehold.

In fact, we noted that some new leasehold properties have seen their prices rise faster than new freehold properties. And if rental yields are what you are concerned with, leasehold properties are able to give a better return compared to their freehold counterparts, all things being equal. After all, why would a tenant care if the property was leasehold or freehold?

But again, even for leasehold properties – age is a factor. Once the tenure of a leasehold property goes below 30 years, its value declines sharply as prospective buyers will not be able to withdraw funds from their Central Provident Fund account or secure a loan for the property purchase.

By: Mr Png Poh Soon, senior manager and Miss Jing Tang, analyst at Knight Frank’s consultancy and research department.

Kwek Leng Beng: ‘I would allot 50 per cent of my portfolio to property’


Source : Today – 30 Jul 2010

Real estate has made a lot of Singaporeans millionaires, property never goes down to zero value, unlike stocks and shares, says CDL executive chairman Kwek Leng Beng

KWEK Leng Beng, 69, is the executive chairman of the Singapore wing of the Hong Leong Group of Companies, a global conglomerate worth over $30 billion employing 50,000 staff. Mr Kwek is also the executive chairman of leading property developer City Developments Limited, and chairman and managing director of Hong Leong Finance, Singapore’s largest finance company. He is also chairman of London-listed Millennium and Copthorne, the hotel arm of Hong Leong Group.

Mr Kwek, who holds a law degree from London, ranks No 9 on the Forbes 2010 Singapore rich list with a net worth of US$1.4 billion ($1.9 billion). He is married with two sons.

In an exclusive interview with Today’s editor-at-large Conrad Raj and senior writer Ansley Ng, Mr Kwek speaks about the property market.

Today: What do you think of the state of the residential market in Singapore now?

Mr Kwek: I think the market is not so bad. In fact it is pretty good, it is healthy. If you analyse the private sector, in the middle section of the property market, we are only 1.4 per cent above the 1996 peak. Compared to the 2008 peak, we are 3.7 per cent higher.

But everybody talks about property prices going very, very high, which is not correct if you look at the statistics. With inflation, after the worldwide stimulus package, the strengthening of our currency, and our gross domestic product now forecast to grow 13 to 15 per cent this year, the 3.7 per cent increase over two years is actually very small.

If you look at the volume of new home sales, volume has increased by quite a bit. For the first half of this year, it was about 8,000 units, while in 2008 it was about 4,200 units.

If you want to say that this is the beginning of a bubble, in that narrow sense, it is correct because we have never seen that kind of volume before. The volume will build up and the price will increase. But that also means there is stronger demand for property.

I think the take-up rate for property is healthy because of the low interest rates, and the big jump in the GDP in the last two quarters.

But we are very fortunate. The price increase is minimal. As long as GDP increases, I don’t think the Government will be unduly concerned if prices continue to increase.

So, is owning property a good thing?

Real estate, as studies show, has made a lot of Singaporeans millionaires. Why? 80-odd per cent own real estate. Many own condominium units. Property never goes down to zero value in most cases, unlike stocks and shares.

Property prices go in cycles. But if you study the charts, after every five to seven years, prices return to the next high. Why? Because we have a good government, we are forward looking, we are a small island, and interest rates are low.

If you put money in a bank, you get about 0.25 per cent per annum. So, why put all your money in a bank? You should diversify your portfolio and put some in real estate.

Your money in the bank, say, one year at 0.25 per cent. After four years, it is 1 per cent. If within four years, Singapore properties cannot increase by more than 1 per cent, then Singapore is not the right place for you to invest in anything at all.

But I would say the current sentiment is not as hot as before because of the recent measures introduced by the Government to prevent the start of a bubble.

In terms of prices, we have not really seen them escalating. For example, at the high end, prices range from $1,800 to $2,200 per square foot. I believe we are still 15 to 20 per cent below the peak. Do you remember, at the peak, prices were done at $5,000 psf? Today, how many properties are done at $4,500 psf? It doesn’t mean it won’t go up to $4,500 psf or beyond. We just don’t know when.

How are the problems in Greece and Hungary affecting us?

Yes, this could be a problem, but to me, if the world can deal with a global financial meltdown, this is only regional and it can be dealt with.

Is bidding at Government Land Sales still as fierce?

You notice that during the bidding at Government land sales, the local developers don’t bid as fiercely as before. It’s only the foreign companies, mainly the Chinese, whose developers and construction companies are coming to Singapore because the Chinese market hasn’t been doing as well. They think there is a lot of money to be made in this part of the world. They bid higher because they’ve got their target audience in China. They think they can get a lot of Chinese to buy here.

How long do you think the present upturn will last?

Provided you have the right pricing and location. If priced wrongly, especially if the location is not so good, I don’t think the properties can move. Or the response may not be so quick.

This buoyancy will last if the global economy recovers quickly. Every fund manager is looking at this part of the world – the Asia-Pacific region. They think the West is going to take a longer time to recover. Many wealth management and private banking operations are coming to Singapore.

A lot of funds, including private equity funds, raise plenty of money but have nothing to invest in. They only want to sell. With this kind of scenario and with inflation starting to be a concern, what better hedge is there other than property?

How do properties in Hong Kong and Shanghai compare with those in Singapore?

You look at Hong Kong. In the worst of times, the largest fall in property prices was about 60 per cent, compared with about 38 per cent in Singapore. But today, Hong Kong has surpassed Singapore in terms of prices.

Even in Shanghai, where I was last week, at the very high end, a developer was proposing to sell at 200,000 yuan per square metre or about $4,000 psf. It had 36 units and there were more than 300 people wanting to buy.

Do you see a lot of foreign money coming in?

They are coming but I think not as much as before the recent financial meltdown. Malaysians are here and the Chinese are coming, but not as many as before. Maybe this is the beginning. When markets crash in your hometown, you realise, maybe the overseas markets are better. We have other foreigners – Indonesians, Australians and British, but not as many as I have seen during the boom of 2008.

How long do you think the low interest rate regime will last? We used to pay 10 to 12 per cent on our mortgages, and now it is only about 2 per cent.

Governments know that you cannot allow interest rates to go up too high because you will kill the economic recovery. You cannot have double-digit interest rates on a sustained basis. It is not possible. Singapore is one of the cheapest in quality housing and there is no shortage of housing loans. Here in Asia, we think we must have a roof over our heads no matter what. Many are millionaires not because their wealth is from stocks and shares, but because they are backed by property.

What have developers been doing to ensure there is no bubble?

What they are trying to do is to price it right to let their inventory move, and at the same time they have to prevent their prices escalating. What they want is to continue to sell, so that they can have good quarterly results, in line with forecasts.

They also know what the Government’s intentions are. The Government will continue to offer land for sale. The developers may not be able to succeed in all their bids, but as long as there are land plots for sale in the pipeline, it’s okay. But you must remember, it will take about three to four years to complete projects. What you want is to lock in your cash flow.

This time round, developers are not over-geared, so they are not burdened by high interest payments. Of course, if they can, they will raise selling prices. But they’ve also got to be frightened because there is a lot of competition.

With foreign developers coming here, will local developers lose out in having an adequate land supply?

Foreign developers who come here, like those from China, haven’t got the experience yet. The local developer may have better quality, better design and better understanding of the market.

But if these foreign developers are targeting Chinese customers, they might have an advantage over the local developer. But I don’t think they will continue to keep bidding high prices for land. They can try in a couple of sites, but if they don’t make money, they will be very reluctant to put in bids for, say, 10 sites at one go. But when they make money and become more confident, they might tender higher in future bids.

Land supply, which depends on the Government, is always adequate. The Government can also always increase plot ratios of land parcels.

You say property is a good hedge and a good investment. What sort of yields are people getting?

The yield for residential properties can be as low as 2.5 to 3.5 per cent. But rentals are starting to go up. In the best of times, you can get 5-per-cent yield; in the worst of times, you get 2 per cent. Even then, it’s better than bank rates.

One of the things I am trying to do is to convince private bankers to sell real estate. They are always trying to sell bonds, equities and the like, but they never sell real estate. For example, in places like London – in the Belgravia area, Knightsbridge, Chelsea and Kensington, you have the Chinese, Hong Kongers, Singaporeans and Arabs who are investors. Prices in these areas have not come down in the recent recession.

Likewise, foreigners will want to come to Singapore. We are the hub of everything.

When it comes to portfolio investments, what sort of balance are you looking at? How much would you allot to property?

I would allot 50 per cent to property. Everybody says property is not liquid. Yes, it’s true. Shares are more liquid. But it’s more a question of pricing. Suppose your condo is worth $1 million and you need money urgently. You can sell it at $800,000. Do you not think anyone will buy? There will be buyers, especially when there is no shortage of housing loans in Singapore.

And if you can borrow from the bank, why shouldn’t the bank lend to you? The highest decline in property prices was 38 per cent. If the bank lends you 35 to 40 per cent, how can the bank lose? They know the value of property here will not collapse like a pack of cards.

On the other hand, if a bank lends money for shares in a company that goes bust, the shares become worthless. For property, as long as the bank holds on, restructures the loan, allows the customer to repay, it is almost always certain that property prices will recover.

How do you define affordability? How much of your income should be used to pay off the mortgage?

Maybe about 30 per cent of your disposable monthly income will be very comfortable. If you have a problem, go to your banker to restructure your loan. They will restructure. After all, they want to be stay in the business. The bank will be frightened if you don’t pay them a single cent.

Compared to Bombay, Delhi, Shanghai and Hong Kong, are prices here cheaper?

I think relatively cheap, in view of the infrastructure on our small island.

For example, in Sentosa (below), at the peak, properties were selling at $3,300 psf. Now oceanfront properties are going for $3,000 to $3,100 psf, and some are even selling at $2,500 psf. But there is no more land on Sentosa to be developed for sale. So, if you add in construction costs, I think developers will soon be selling at more than $3,000 psf.

A Chinese national recently bought a Sentosa bungalow for $36 million from the seller who bought it only one year ago for $20 million. In Sentosa, there are only about 2,000 residential units. With the integrated resorts, demand will continue to be strong there.

The integrated resorts have brought in many types of people. Some find Singapore a pleasant place to live in and may decide to buy a property here, to invest as a second home. Some who come here regularly might not want to stay in a hotel at the casino; or they may have other restrictions. Some bankers, for instance, are not allowed to stay in casino hotels.

For the broader market, there is a possibility of some of those waiting for HDB upgrading to decide to buy private condominiums instead. Some of them will think: “I cannot wait. Why don’t I just upgrade myself, since housing loan rates are so low?”


Real Estate Sentiment Index shows property market likely to worsen

Source : Straits Times – 30 Jul 2010

A NEW index tracking the property market shows that developers and other industry players remain positive but believe conditions will cool down from the bullish levels seen in recent months.

More developers also believe the slowing global economy and an increased supply of new development land may hit market sentiment over the next six months.

The Real Estate Sentiment Index, which was launched at a seminar yesterday, also points to rising interest rates and an excessive supply of new property launches as market risks. The index has been jointly developed by the Real Estate Developers Association of Singapore (Redas) and the department of real estate at the National University of Singapore (NUS). It is based on data collected in a quarterly survey of Redas members to get a snapshot of market sentiment. The poll started in the first quarter.

The reading for the second quarter stood at 5.9, down from 6.8 in the first quarter. This shows that while industry players are still positive, they expect market conditions to worsen.

With empirical data, it is always about the past, said Dr Yu Shi Ming, head of NUS’ department of real estate.

‘With the index, we hope that as soon as a policy is announced, we can get a sense of how the industry feels,’ he said.

Redas chief executive Steven Choo said that apart from its members, policymakers, banks and other firms may find it useful.

There have been about 70 respondents for the survey each quarter – about 60 per cent are developers and the rest consultants and other industry figures.

About 51 per cent of developers polled for the second quarter expect prices of new launches to rise, compared with 85 per cent in the first quarter. About 68 per cent expect more new units to be launched over the next six months, compared with 83 per cent in the first quarter.

About half of the developers polled feel the level of interest for public and private development land will remain unchanged in the near term. Developers are most concerned with rising land prices, followed by the cost of building materials and labour.

At Redas’ seminar yesterday, Rider Levett Bucknall’s managing partner, Mr Winston Hauw, said: ‘It’s good to tender this year as there’s more uncertainty next year. We think prices will go up slightly next year.’


What booms will eventually bust

By Colin Tan, head of research and consultancy at Chesterton Suntec International.

When the property market is on a roll, it is easy to forget that property prices move in cycles – that is, prices can and will eventually correct. I know of no mature economy which has seen an uninterrupted and sustained upward cycle. Cycles are part and parcel of the function of the modern economy.

In the early days, the evidence suggested that the Singapore private housing market had a cycle – from boom to bust – of about six to seven years.

For a healthy and growing economy like Singapore’s, these cycles oscillate around an upward sloping long-term trend line – that is, each boom and bust is higher than the previous high and low points.

However, with the onset of globalisation and the opening up of the Singapore economy to the world, our cycles appear to be growing alarmingly shorter and more pronounced after each boom and bust.

The more pronounced and shorter the cycles, the more speculators and investors it will attract because there is big money to be made in double-quick time.

The official price index showed that our most recent down-cycle lasted only four quarters. Our current up-cycle has just completed its fourth quarter. The sharp rebound that began in the second half of last year was peppered with two sets of cooling measures, which some say, helped to extend the life of the current up-cycle.

How much longer will this extension last?

The private housing market these days behaves more and more like the stock market, given the predominance of investors over owner occupiers. Shoebox apartments are akin to penny stocks or warrants, more to speculate with than to live in.

It is quite clear that there is now a “buzz” about the Singapore economy which Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said was missing before. Foreign visitors tell me they feel it too, an excitement about the city which they did not experience on their previous trips.

This explains why our properties look extremely attractive to outsiders. Even foreign insiders, Permanent Residents who have lived in Singapore for more than 10 to 15 years and who have not invested in Singapore property in a big way before, are not hesitating to spend lots of cash – and I mean cash – for properties which catch their fancy.

Yes, the homes these people are looking at are all good, solid properties. But even for such properties, there is a fair price. Not one which is only fair 10 years down the road. What good is property as a hedge against inflation when you are already grossly overpaying for it?

But I cannot blame them. If not them, others are more than willing to cough up the cash.

Notwithstanding my red flags, I will also admit that the market will only correct when it is ready to do so. Before that, no amount of logical reasoning can convince the market to behave otherwise. Like a fever, it needs to run its course.

Some have commented that even if prices were to correct, they will never return to the levels five years ago. Normally, I would agree. But these are not normal times. Interest rates have been abnormally low for the longest sustained period ever. I would not be surprised even if prices were to descend to below those previous levels.

The market is surely building itself up to possibly the greatest crescendo in Singapore’s short property history. We are setting records – buying and supplying more than we have ever done before in the past twelve months.

Most investors tell me they are long-term players and they have the resources to hold onto their properties. What do they actually mean?

It was not so long ago that the Government was trying just to get every Singaporean household to own their homes.

Have we progressed so far and so fast that many households are now able to buy their second or third properties? Do these investors mean they can fully pay for all their properties to maturity?

Or do they mean they can comfortably service their loans for up to two or three years under current conditions. What happens when these conditions change? Are they taking low interest rates as a given?


Thursday, July 29, 2010

HDB launches two more BTO flats at Bukit Panjang and Jurong West

Source : Channel NewsAsia – 29 Jul 2010

The Housing and Development Board is launching two new Build To Order (BTO) projects Thursday at Senja Gateway in Bukit Panjang and Corporation Tiara in Jurong West.

A total of 1,016 flats will be offered.

This comprises 254 units of Studio Apartments, 484 units of four-room and 278 units of five-room flats.

HDB says 95 per cent of the public supply of four- and five-room flats will be set aside for first-timers.

With Thursday’s launch, HDB would have offered a total of 9,844 new BTO flats for the first seven months of this year, exceeding the supply of 9,000 BTO flats offered for the whole of 2009.

If demand from first-timer households is sustained, HDB says it is prepared to offer up to 16,000 BTO flats in 2010.

In comparison, the total annual take-up of HDB flats offered in the last ten years ranged from 7,000 in 2006 to 16,100 in 2000, and there were balance flats almost every year.

HDB adds that the upcoming projects for the rest of 2010 will enjoy a good geographical spread, covering areas such as Punggol, Sengkang, Woodlands and Yishun.

HDB adds that its new flats are priced with a generous subsidy below their market value.

The selling prices for the flats at Senja Gateway range from $67,000 to $95,000 for a Studio Apartment, $242,000 to $306,000 for a four-room flat and $308,000 to $398,000 for a five-room flat.

At Corporation Tiara the prices range from $242,000 to $325,000 for a four-room flat and $304,000 to $389,000 for a five-room flat.

Applications for the new flats can be submitted online from Thursday till the August 11.

HDB says it will continue to ensure that there is an adequate supply of new flats to meet housing demand.

Next month, flat buyers can look forward to the launch of about 1,400 flats in Yishun.


Construction costs may rise up to 6% next year due to new regulations

Source : Channel NewsAsia – 29 Jul 2010

Construction costs in Singapore may increase by up to six per cent next year when new government regulations to restrict foreign workers kick in.

According to the new Real Estate Sentiment Index, rising land prices and construction costs are some of the top concerns among developers.

New rules that will kick in this month include an increase in foreign worker levy.

There’ll also be a reduction of man-year entitlement which will restrict the number of foreign workers the main contractor can hire.

On top of that, new noise limits for construction sites will also come into effect in September.

Experts said these changes may also prolong the duration of projects and drive up overall costs.

Industry players are also concerned about volatility in commodity prices and rising cost of crude oil.

Winston Hauw, managing partner, Rider Levett Bucknall, said: “For this particular year, we think there’ll be an increase in the order of three per cent.

“For next year, we expect it to be a little higher, probably in the range of five to six per cent. Construction demand is the key driver in terms of tender price escalation.”

Mr Hauw added that tender prices are moving in tandem with demand volume and may increase by an average of three per cent on year in 2010.

The new quarterly Real Estate Sentiment Index shows that 90 per cent of respondents expressed a moderate to high level of concern about rising land prices while 76 per cent cited the increase in building material costs and labour costs as their chief concerns.

Dr Steven Choo, CEO, Redas, said: “The implications of such an index is that it will provide the market with an idea of how the real estate development players perceive the market so it will benefit the investors.

“It can guide them in their decisions. It can also have implications for policy directions in terms of how the market can be regulated or should be facilitated and of course for the developers themselves, we would like to know what it is that our industry is thinking.”

The new index is jointly developed by the Real Estate Developer’s Association of Singapore and the Department of Real Estate at NUS.

REDAS said the survey also showed that sentiment among developers are still positive but they are expecting market conditions to be less favourable going forward.

For example, the Composite Sentiment Index which measures both current and future sentiment stood at 5.9 out of 10 in the second quarter. That’s down from 6.8 in the first quarter.

The survey also found that in the primary residential market, respondents feel that the price and number of units to be launched are expected to increase riding on current positive sentiments.

For now, Redas said the index will be available to its members through e-bulletins.

For the first and second quarters, they polled some 70 of Redas’ members including developers and industry watchers.


Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Four flats repossessed by HDB

Source : AsiaOne – 28 Jul 2010

The Housing Board took compulsory acquisition (CA) action against four flat owners for unauthorised subletting in the first five months of this year.

It had stepped up efforts against unauthorized subletting, with a total of 2,600 checks conducted on HDB flats in that period.

Another six cases of unauthorized subletting were made to pay a penalty.

Click here to find out more!
In all four of the instances when the flats were compulsorily acquired, the flat owners did not occupy the flats they bought and sublet without HDB’s approval.

One flat owner, Mr G, was locked out of his own home when he allowed a moneylender to illegally sublet his flat and use the rent collected as repayment. He asked HDB for help in regaining entry to his flat, and later divulged that he had used his flat as collateral for his loan and needed to pay back the moneylender. He then allowed the moneylender to sublet his flat to pay for his loan.

The HDB, which helped him regain entry to his flat, took CA action against him as he did not occupy his flat and did not evict the subtenants desppite reminders from HDB.

In the second case, Miss R sublet the flat without HDB’s approval a year after she purchased the flat despite not meeting the minimum occupation period.

The Housing Board informed her that she had to evict her subtenants and occupy her flat. However, while she let the tenants go, she still did not stay at her flat, which prompted the CA action.

In the third instance, Madam P jointly purchased a flat with her husband but stayed overseas all this while. She illegally sublet the flat without meeting the minimum occupation period as well. Her subtenants confirmed that the utilities bills were paid by them, and when her marriage broke down, her foreigner ex-husband divulged that the flat was never intended as their matrimonial home.

When she returned to Singapore, she chose to stay with her family instead of her own flat. In light of the fact that her flat was illegally sublet and was never meant for her occupation, HDB repossessed her flat.

In the fourth case, Mdm C illegally sublet the flat to a religious group, also without meeting the minimum occupation period, leading to the CA action.

Of the 2,600 cases the HDB, investigation is still ongoing for around 300 cases, with 59 suspected to have infringed on subletting rules.


HDB investigates 300 cases for unauthorised subletting

Source : Channel NewsAsia – 28 Jul 2010

The Housing and Development Board (HDB) is investigating 300 cases for unauthorised subletting with four owners losing their units and six fined for illegal subletting so far.

This comes after HDB stepped up enforcement against unauthorised subletting and conducted 2,600 checks on HDB flats in the first five months of this year.

Of the 300 cases, 59 cases are suspected to have infringed the subletting rules.

Meanwhile, the four flat owners who lost their units did not occupy the flats they bought and sublet without HDB’s approval.

Of the 2,600 checks, 1860 were identified from HDB’s routine inspections while the remaining 740 were based on feedback by the public.

The checks were a four-fold increase compared with the 690 inspections carried out from August to December 2009.

Cases where flat owners lock up one room and sublet the rest of the flat without physically staying in the unit will be treated as unauthorised subletting if home owners do not meet the minimum occupation period and did not seek HDB’s approval to sublet their flats.

Flat owners are reminded to seek HDB’s approval if they intend to sublet their flats.

They must also register subtenants if they sublet rooms.


Tuesday, July 27, 2010

BCA mulls law to get owners to “green” existing buildings

Source : Channel NewsAsia – 27 Jul 2010

The Building and Construction Authority (BCA) is mulling a possible law to get property owners make their existing buildings more environmentally-friendly.

The rule will cover all existing buildings, with the main focus on commercial and office buildings and hotels. This could come in two to three years to help Singapore meet its goal of “greening” 80 percent of its buildings by 2030.

So far, only 8 percent of some 210 million square metres of existing floor area have been “greened”.

To promote sustainable development, the BCA launched the Green Mark Scheme in 2005. Over 450 buildings in Singapore are now part of the scheme, and all new buildings have to meet minimum Green Mark standards.

To get existing buildings to follow suit, a S$100 million “Green Mark Incentive Scheme For Existing Buildings” was launched in April last year to encourage building owners to undertake the necessary retrofits to upgrade their buildings.

Separately, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) will also grant additional floor area to encourage the private sector to develop buildings that attain higher tier Green Mark ratings.

Dr John Keung, CEO of BCA, said: “We haven’t gone very far yet but we are looking at whether there are interested developers, good consultants, designers to re-design the buildings to retrofit the buildings.”

BCA said the costs of constructing green buildings have come down.

The premium for a Green Mark Platinum building was around 2-5 percent of total investment previously. Now it’s about 1 to 2 percent. This has also cut the payback period of the investment.

BCA is also expected to update its Green Building Masterplan next month.

BCA said it is in talks with industry players and so far, some developers and landlords of hotels are keen on the idea of greening existing buildings, because of the savings that can be reaped from being energy efficient.

Separately, the Singapore Contractors Association wants to raise environmental awareness among its members through a new two-day workshop.

The association hopes to take the programme overseas in five years.

Andrew Khng, president of Singapore Contractors Association, said: “What the Association has done is it has come up with an initiative to promote a certification scheme – called SEC SCAL Eco certification scheme – for members and this is to look at reducing carbon footprint for members.”

The outlook is bright for the construction sector.

The first half of the year saw about S$11 billion of projects awarded.

BCA said another S$10b to S$16b in contracts are due out in the second half.

Construction demand for 2011 and 2012 has been projected to be between S$18b and S$25b each year.


S’pore real estate firms axe thousands of agents ahead of new MND regulations

Source : Channel NewsAsia – 27 Jul 2010

Real estate firms in Singapore have axed thousands of agents, ahead of the regulatory framework to be implemented by the National Development Ministry.

The framework seeks to professionalise the industry, with the introduction of a new statutory board, known as the Council for Estate Agencies, and enhanced regulatory guidelines.

Channel NewsAsia understands that a Bill for the framework could be introduced in Parliament as early as October.

When contacted, the Ministry would only say that a Bill will be introduced in the second half of this year, with the Council operational by year-end.

Director of Dennis Wee Group, Chris Koh said: “It’s going to be difficult for agents with a full-time job while moonlighting as an agent. Because the moment the employer goes into this public registry, the employer will know that you are an agent, and you stand to lose your existing full-time job.”

Earlier this month, Dennis Wee Group’s (DWG) housing agents were called back to their office to update their personal information and be briefed on the requirements of the new regulatory framework. The information collected was then submitted to the National Development Ministry, to be part of a new central registry of all agents.

1,500 of 5,000 agents were axed as a result of the exercise – mostly inactive or part-time staff.

Under the new guidelines, agents will also be required to pass a mandatory industry examination. Only those who already have industry certification will be exempted.

Rather than wait for the new examination, DWG has asked all its agents to get themselves certified with either the Certified Estate Agent Course or the Common Examination for Salespersons.

Another firm, PropNex, terminated 1,200 agents at the start of this year, either because they were inactive or unwilling to take up personal indemnity insurance.

The insurance covers any financial liabilities arising from housing transactions.

Agents associated with money-lending were also released.

CEO of PropNex, Mohd Ismail said: “Any PropNex agent who has a money-lending licence will not be allowed to practice. He or she will have to make a decision, because we do see a conflict of interest. We have terminated an agent who has been very active, however, he wanted to maintain both and that was not acceptable to us.”

ERA, which has about 3,000 active agents, says it removes about 100 inactive agents from its database every month.

Associate director of ERA Asia Pacific, Eugene Lim said the company has also been conducting training to prepare their agents for the Common Examination for Salespersons.

To date, more than 2,500 ERA agents have taken this exam, with some having to do retakes for the paper.

HSR, which represents some 7,000 agents, says it regularly checks its database for inactive agents who are then put on a passive list and sent reminders to go for retraining.

There are an estimated 30,000 housing agents in Singapore.

The National Development Ministry has also been in consultation with various real estate firms to standardise documents used in the trade.

These include documents governing an agent’s exclusive right to sell a property.

Currently, each agency has its own terms and conditions, which can be confusing for consumers.


Monday, July 26, 2010

Righting an ‘imbalance’

Source : Today – 26 Jul 2010

Red-hot HDB resale market will take a year to stabilise: Mah

Along with strong economic fundamentals, the red-hot HDB resale market is a result of an imbalance in demand and supply, and it will take a year or so for prices to stabilise, National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan said yesterday.

In the interim, the Housing and Development Board will roll out 18,000 to 19,000 flats this year.

“I hope with HDB pushing out a record number of flats this year, this imbalance will be redressed over the medium term,” Mr Mah said on the sidelines of HDB’s final community celebration for its 50th anniversary.

Some 9,000 build-to-order (BTO) units have been launched in the first half of the year, and another 7,000 flats will go on sale over the coming months. There will also be executive condominiums, Design, Build and Sell Scheme flats and some Sale of Balance flats, totalling about 2,000 to 3,000 units.

“If you’re a first-time buyer, there’s more than enough flats for you. But if you’re a second-timer, you have to compete in the market with the first-timers and others, and this equilibrium in the prices will be reached at a point in time in the medium term as we push out this supply,” said Mr Mah.

Property experts told MediaCorp that the European debt crisis, the possibility of a double-dip recession and a possible rise in interest rates may also impact price stability.

“The factors that suddenly come together to push up prices, if it’s not due to demographics – permanent residents and investor buying – can disappear just as quickly as (they) came,” Chesterton Suntec International research and consultancy director Colin Tan said.

Demand is also hard to predict. Mr Mah said the indication is that there will be “some slowdown” in the economy later this year.

Ngee Ann Polytechnic real estate lecturer Nicholas Mak said that “discretionary buyers” – those who can wait or have other housing options – are choosing to buy now “because they fear prices will rise”. He added: “If enough of them go into the market, it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.”

Agreeing, Mr Tan cautioned about a possible downside to a sharp rise in supply in just one year.

“If the demographics don’t support this, there’ll be a huge boom-and-bust cycle,” he said.

For now, Mr Mah recognised that the concern is over the Cash-Over-Valuation (COV) quantum. The latest median figure is $30,000.

But he stressed this had to be decided by the market.

“It’s in the interest of buyers to have low COVs, but it’s in the interest of sellers who own the flats to have high COVs.

“So, between these two groups, we must let them fight it out. The Government is not able to settle or fix COVs to say that it should be this or this figure,” he said.

“The Government prefers not to interfere. But we can interfere in the supply. This is something we can control.

“And I say again, we’re going to push out enough flats for first-timers. That’s the promise we’ve made, and that’s the promise we intend to keep.”


Pastoral View condo teams up with adjoining site for en bloc sale

Source : Channel NewsAsia – 26 Jul 2010

A condominium near Novena MRT is teaming up with an adjoining site for an en bloc sale.

The 50-unit development Pastoral View is being offered for joint sale with an adjoining land parcel at Bassein Road.

Property consultant Credo Real Estate says the sellers are looking at a price of between S$130 million and S$150 million.

Credo adds that by combining the two sites, developers will find the enlarged land parcel more attractive as they are able to enjoy economies of scale.

The combined site has a land area of 51,395 square feet.

It has a gross plot ratio of 2.8 and an allowable height of up to 36 storeys, making up a total gross floor area of about 144,000 square feet.

Credo says upon redevelopment, the site may accommodate a high-rise tower of 140 apartments with an average size of 1,000 square feet.

It adds that the asking price translates to a land rate of
S$904-S$1,043 per square foot per plot ratio, after factoring in a development charge of about S$157,000.

More than 80 percent of the owners at Pastoral View have already signed a collective sale agreement to sell their properties together.

The tender for the site closes on 23 August at 2.30pm.


Broad-based growth in Q2 property prices

Source : AsiaOne – 26 Jul 2010

Momentum of recovery in private residential rents also picked up

PRIVATE home prices generally rose at a slightly slower pace in Q2 than they did in Q1, but latest official numbers show a broad-based growth in property prices – with stronger quarter-on-quarter gains for office, shop and industrial properties, as well as HDB resale flat prices in Q2 than in the first quarter.

The momentum of recovery in private residential rents also picked up in the second quarter, supported by an acceleration in hiring of expats as Singapore’s economy continues to expand.

‘Sentiment among developers and market watchers probably moderated from the end of first quarter as a result of the eurozone’s economic problems, but the recent spectacular official GDP growth forecast for Singapore has probably helped to restore some confidence,’ said Real Estate Developers Association of Singapore CEO Steven Choo.

The Urban Redevelopment Authority’s (URA) benchmark overall price index for private homes rose 5.3 per cent in the second quarter over the preceding quarter, close to the 5.6 per cent per cent hike in Q1.

The price index for office space increased 4.6 per cent quarter on quarter in Q2, a bigger gain than the 1.8 per cent quarter-on-quarter rise in Q1.

Likewise, the shop price index went up 3.9 per cent in Q2, following a 1.8 per cent pick-up in the first three months. URA’s flatted factory and warehouse price indices rose 5.4 and 9.4 per cent in Q2. In Q1, each of these increased 1.5 per cent.

In the private housing market, prices of detached houses rose 6.8 per cent in Q2, slower than the 9.6 per cent increase in Q1. Semi-D and terrace houses appreciated 6 per cent and 5.6 per cent respectively in Q2 – compared with increases of 7.5 and 7.4 per cent in the first three months.

Non-landed home prices in Core Central Region (which includes the prime districts, Marina Bay and Sentosa Cove) climbed 5.4 per cent in Q2, higher than the 4.4 per cent growth in Q1. Likewise, the price index for Outside Central Region (where suburban condos are located) rose 5.7 per cent in Q2 after increasing 4.3 per cent in Q1.

However, in Rest of Central Region the pace of price gain slowed from 7.9 per cent in the first quarter to 4.6 per cent in Q2.

In the primary market, developers sold a total of 4,033 private homes in Q2, down 7.9 per cent from Q1. In the secondary market, strong buying momentum was also seen in the resale market, with 4,682 private homes changing hands in Q2, although this was 5.6 per cent lower than the first three months of the year. However, subsale volumes eased 27.4 per cent, from 996 deals in Q1 to 723 in Q2.

‘Resales were strong in Q2 because prices are more reasonable for older, completed properties than new project launches. On the other hand, subsales (which are secondary-market deals involving projects that have yet to receive Certificate of Statutory Completion) come in waves. Those who bought homes from developers in the past few months are probably waiting for prices to rise further before they offload their units,’ suggests a market watcher.

In the leasing market, URA’s All Residential rental index rose 5.9 per cent in Q2 over the preceding quarter, compared with a 4.7 per cent quarter-on-quarter gain in Q1. The index has appreciated 10.9 per cent since end-2009.

Rents accelerated for both landed and non-landed private homes. Terrace houses led the landed segment, with rents rising 6.6 per cent in Q2, followed by semi-detached houses (up 5.6 per cent) and detached (up 4.6 per cent). For non-landed homes, rents in Core Central Region appreciated the most, by 6.4 per cent, followed by Outside Central Region (up 6.1 per cent) and Rest of Central Region (5.1 per cent).

However, the latest All Residential rental index is about 11.1 per cent below its peak in Q2 2008.

Jones Lang LaSalles’ head of residential Jacqueline Wong said the latest official figures confirm feedback from the ground. Monthly rentals of four-bedroom apartments in high-end developments such as Grange Residences, Draycott 8 and Ardmore Park are hitting $16,000-$18,000 on average – an improvement from $14,000-$15,000 in the second half of last year.

‘But we still haven’t achieved the peak levels of $18,000-$22,000 seen in the late 2007 to mid-2008 period,’ Ms Wong added. ‘We’re seeing rehiring of expats again but housing allowances are not as generous as before.’

Ms Wong is predicting flattish rents until the end of this year, citing new competition with the impending completion of The Orchard Residences and The Marq on Paterson Hill.

URA numbers show 4,379 private homes received Temporary Occupation Permit (TOP) in Q2, compared with 1,407 units in Q1. The surge in new completions pushed up the islandwide vacancy rate for private homes to 5.4 per cent at end-Q2, from 4.6 per cent at end-Q1. But this could ease again as owners or tenants move into the new homes.

Major residential projects completed in April-June 2010 include One Amber, Marina Bay Residences, Dakota Residences and The Arte.

With a further 4,958 units expected to receive TOP by year end, the full-year tally will be 10,744, slightly above last year’s 10,488 units.


Sunday, July 25, 2010

HDB commits another S$550m for upgrading in Tampines, Pasir Ris & Hougang

Source : Channel NewsAsia – 25 Jul 2010

The Housing and Development Board (HDB) has committed another S$550 million to upgrade the living environment for another 54,000 homes in three middle-aged towns – Pasir Ris, Tampines and Hougang.

Launching the HDB’s 50th anniversary celebrations at Tampines Town on Sunday, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean said the government has already spent S$540 million in these three towns to the benefit of some 67,000 homes.

He stressed that as long as Singapore has the financial resources, the government will continue to upgrade and rejuvenate the housing estates.

And to keep up with the transformation of residential areas, supporting facilities like commercial and social areas will also be upgraded.

Mr Teo said Loyang Point in Pasir Ris will be upgraded at year’s end, with 40 new shops being added.

He said: “The result of all these efforts will be a better living environment for everyone, and towns that we can proudly call our own. Our HDB flats are not just flats, they are homes that root us to our community. People are at the very centre of every HDB development.

“While the physical transformation of the public housing landscape has been impressive, the kampong spirit must also be preserved and nurtured.”

Mr Teo, who’s also MP for Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC, said it has been an experience to work with the HDB, grassroots and community leaders in improving neighbourhoods, and help new residents settle into their new homes.


HDB to build more new flats for first-timers: Mah Bow Tan

Source : Channel NewsAsia – 25 Jul 2010

National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan said more new HDB flats will be built for first-time applicants, so as to relieve the pressure on the resale market.

He said this at a grassroots event celebrating the HDB’s 50th Anniversary on Sunday.

It is the last leg of a series of events HDB has been conducting in the heartlands.

The “Storeys of Our Homes” exhibition celebrates 50 years of public housing.

And with HDB resale flat prices hitting new highs recently, causing cash-over valuation (COV) to go up, Mr Mah made the promise to push out enough flats for first-time home buyers.

His advice for them is to go for new flats, where there is no COV.

“What HDB is going to do is to build more new flats for first-timers, so this will help take care of the first-timer market, and that will help to reduce some pressure on the resale flat market. So over time, the resale flat market will stabilise. I think at this point in time, there is still an imbalance,” said Mr Mah.

Mr Mah expects HDB to offer a record number of some 18,000 new flats this year.

Of these, 16,000 will be from the Build-To-Order (BTO) exercise.

And he said 95 per cent of the new flats will be for first-timers, while the remaining 5 per cent of new flats will be for second-timers.

“It is the second-timers, upgraders and downgraders who have to go into the secondary resale flat market,” Mr Mah said.

He continued: “If you are a first-timer buyer, there’s more than enough flats for you. But if you are a second-timer, obviously you have to compete in the market with the first-timers and others.

“This equilibrium in the prices will be reached at some point in time in the medium term as we push out this supply. So I would expect in another year or so, it should be able to stabilise everything.”

Mr Mah added demand for flats depends on the economy.

Singapore’s economic growth was strong in the first half of the year, but it may slow down in the second half.

However, he said three years is the “norm” waiting time for new flats.

Those who do not want to wait have other options, such as resale flats. But he added this is one reason resale flats are more expensive, as the “cost difference reflects the time difference”.